|
|
|
|
User Reviews/Comments:
rate:
avg:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
wrong information, please look into this link and other studies done comparing MLC to SLC.
http://techreport.com/review/26523/the-ssd-endurance-experiment-casualties-on-the-way-to-a-petabyte/3
The information is correct. The article you quoted actually compares MLC to TLC, and it also confirms that by design TLC flash is more sensitive to wear because it has more cell states.
In addition, those tests only indicate how many times data can be written, but not how long the written data can be retained, so they give a useful, but by no means complete picture.
The article is accurate.
ADATA SP550 is a TLC drive, with an SLC cache (2-8GB). So it is kind of like a hybrid SSD/HDD drives where the initial writes are done to the cache (SLC layer), which are super fast, up to 500MB/s, but when you do a large transfer of, say, 20GB, once the cache is filled, it slows down to the TLC speeds which can be slower than HDD (SP550 120GB drive's sustained average write speed is 73MB/s on a 26.8GB transfer, which is abysmal). Check out tweaktown's review of the SP550. A lot of the SSD manufacturers are switching to cheaper TLC drives and by using a small SLC cache, they get to advertise "up to 500MB/s transfer speeds". The key being the "up to" part. It is very deceiving, really. Especially when a company like Crucial releases the next version of a super popular SSD but switches from MLC to TLC in the process, while still advertising the same speeds. In reality, the BX200 is much slower than the BX100 when sustained writes are taken into consideration. |