The Broadband Guide
SG
search advanced
 search
FAQs Categories:

Is RG-6 coax cable better than RG-59 ?

In most TV cabling applications, RG-6 is better than RG-59.

Coaxial cables use RG (radio-guide) ratings to distinguish between the different cable standards. The numbers are randomly assigned without a specific order. RG-59 is an older standard that was designed for lower frequencies, RG-6 is a newer standard designed to incur lower loss over higher frequencies.

RG-6 cable
RG-6 is generally a much better choice for anything over 50MHz, such as, Cable TV, Satellite, Broadband internet, FM and VHF/UHF HDTV antennas. RG-6 was designed to be more effective with higher Gigahertz frequencies, and incurs less singal loss compared to RG-59.

Typical RG-6 Signal Loss per 100 ft:
50 MHz: 1.5 dB
100 MHz: 2.0 dB
400 MHz: 4.3 dB
900 MHz: 6.8 dB
1000 MHz: 7.0 dB

RG-59 cable
RG-59 is generally better for frequencies lower than 50 MHz, like CCTV systems. It is an older standard cable that was used for TV connections, however, it has a smaller conductor than RG-6, and its shielding is not well suited to keep higher Gigahertz frequencies inside the conductor very well.

Typical RG-59 Signal Loss per 100 ft:
50 MHz: 2.4 dB
100 MHz: 3.4 dB
400 MHz: 7.0 dB
900 MHz: 11.1 dB
1000 MHz: 12.0 dB

Notes:
For all intents and purposes RG-6 and RG-6/U are the same.
Outdoor rated cables have a "PE" jacket instead PVC to make them more resistant to cold weather, moisture, chemicals, abrasion, etc. They also have a special gel-like substance in the jacket to block moisture from corroding the conductor.


  Post your review/comments
    rate:
   avg:
News Glossary of Terms FAQs Cool Links SpeedGuide Teams SG Premium Services SG Gear Store
Registry Tweaks Broadband Tools Downloads/Patches Broadband Hardware SG Ports Database Security Default Passwords User Stories
Broadband Security Editorials General User Articles Quick Reference
Broadband Forums General Discussions
Advertising Awards Link to us Server Statistics Helping SG About