Check my tracert results ?

vic451 · Post by **vic451** » Tue Feb 05, 2002 7:52 pm

Tracing route to speedguide.net [161.58.189.81]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 10 ms 10 ms 20 ms 10.*2.1*2.1
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 * * * Request timed out.
5 * * * Request timed out.
6 <10 ms 10 ms 10 ms 6*.*0.0.*0
7 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms sl-gw37-pen-7-1.sprintlink.net [144.223.44.9]
8 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms sl-bb20-pen-5-3.sprintlink.net [144.232.5.41]
9 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms sl-bb20-nyc-13-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.18.38]
10 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms sl-bb21-nyc-9-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.7.9]
11 10 ms 10 ms 20 ms p4-4-1-0.r00.nycmny01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.9.49]
12 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms p4-6-3-0.r00.nycmny06.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.4.50]
13 10 ms 20 ms 20 ms p4-4-0-0.r01.mclnva02.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.3.182]
14 10 ms 20 ms 10 ms p16-7-0-0.r00.stngva01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.3.158]
15 10 ms 20 ms 10 ms ge-4-1.c00.stngva01.us.ah.vwh.net [129.250.27.184]
16 10 ms 20 ms 20 ms 161.58.156.173
17 10 ms 20 ms 10 ms 161.58.189.81

Check out my hops 2-5 . This is a tracert to speedguide.net.

kjboughton · Post by **kjboughton** » Tue Feb 05, 2002 9:10 pm

Hot digitty-damn! That's what a traceroute is supposed to look like, I would love if mine looked like that. You are technically right when being concerned about hops 2-5: ALL computers connected outside of a LAN are REQUIRED to echo ICMP requests (respond to a ping). Although they do not the fact that they are passing packets along are evidence enough that everything is working fine. No problem here whatsoever.

-Kris

Indy · Post by **Indy** » Tue Feb 05, 2002 11:32 pm

Originally posted by vic451

Check out my hops 2-5 . This is a tracert to speedguide.net.

Looks good...

hops 2 - 5 are set up to not respond to udp requests...same for me on hops 2 and 3 here...

Tracing route to http://www.speedguide.net [161.58.189.81]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 14 ms 14 ms 14 ms 10.144.192.1
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 <10 ms 14 ms 14 ms 68.57.192.50
5 13 ms 14 ms 14 ms 12.125.142.105
6 13 ms 42 ms 14 ms gbr5-p80.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.5.218]
7 14 ms 14 ms 13 ms tbr2-p013501.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.11.57]
8 13 ms 14 ms 14 ms ggr1-p3100.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.11.210]
9 14 ms 14 ms 13 ms p4-0.att.chcgil01.us.bb.verio.net [192.205.32.70]
10 14 ms 13 ms 14 ms p16-5-0-0.r01.chcgil01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.2.220]
11 68 ms 55 ms 55 ms p16-2-0-0.r02.stngva01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.5.103]
12 55 ms 55 ms 55 ms ge-3-1.c00.stngva01.us.ah.vwh.net [129.250.27.216]
13 55 ms 55 ms 55 ms 161.58.156.173
14 55 ms 55 ms 55 ms 161.58.189.81

Trace complete.

BlackSword · Post by **BlackSword** » Wed Feb 06, 2002 8:40 am

Originally posted by vic451

Check out my hops 2-5 . This is a tracert to speedguide.net.

Seem very fishy that all your ping times are either 10 or 20. Very hard to believe.

Additionally going 17 Hops in 10ms,,, very hard to believe.

Then add to the fact you got a 20ms hit on your first HOP?

vic451 · Post by **vic451** » Wed Feb 06, 2002 9:24 am

See Yow and i are thinking alike . I thought that was weird to . Maybe i'm just paranoid . But, I see how my service is and i think that the tracert looks odd . It never even looked like that before the @home switch . They day they switched boom hops 2-5 blocked and the "good" pings . Too bad i have a bad connection with good pings

Post by **Philip** » Wed Feb 06, 2002 9:38 am

Here are a few traces from our server:

traceroute to 144.223.44.9 (144.223.44.9), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
1 161.58.178.129 (161.58.178.129) 0.386 ms 0.318 ms 0.302 ms
2 161.58.156.172 (161.58.156.172) 0.383 ms 0.351 ms 0.334 ms
3 ge-1-3-0.r00.stngva01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.27.190) 0.411 ms 0.420 ms 0.372 ms
4 p4-1-3-0.r01.asbnva01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.4.218) 1.409 ms 1.408 ms 1.449 ms
5 p4-0.sprint.asbnva01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.9.2) 1.420 ms 1.432 ms 1.311 ms
6 sl-bb27-rly-15-3.sprintlink.net (144.232.20.6) 3.120 ms 2.942 ms 2.877 ms
7 sl-bb25-pen-10-2.sprintlink.net (144.232.20.24) 6.631 ms 6.530 ms 6.900 ms
8 sl-gw37-pen-10-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.5.70) 6.944 ms * 6.780 ms

traceroute to ardentcomm.com (63.217.26.47), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
1 161.58.178.129 (161.58.178.129) 0.439 ms 0.312 ms 0.302 ms
2 161.58.156.172 (161.58.156.172) 0.367 ms 0.352 ms 0.322 ms
3 ge-1-3-0.r00.stngva01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.27.190) 0.451 ms 0.406 ms 0.400 ms
4 p16-1-0-0.r01.mclnva02.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.3.157) 1.232 ms 1.566 ms 1.261 ms
5 p4-0-0.r00.mclnva02.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.2.249) 1.215 ms 1.236 ms 1.146 ms
6 mae-east.cais.net (198.32.187.147) 2.675 ms 2.491 ms 2.452 ms
7 pos5-1.colo1.mcl.cais.net (63.216.0.38) 2.701 ms 2.516 ms 2.532 ms
8 ardentcomm.com (63.217.26.47) 2.866 ms 3.045 ms 3.026 ms

traceroute to candidhosting.com (64.159.90.13), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
1 161.58.178.129 (161.58.178.129) 0.370 ms 3.881 ms 0.300 ms
2 161.58.156.172 (161.58.156.172) 0.380 ms 0.335 ms 0.321 ms
3 ge-1-3-0.r02.stngva01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.27.215) 0.380 ms 0.380 ms 0.395 ms
4 p16-7-0-0.r02.mclnva02.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.5.47) 1.426 ms 2.125 ms 1.430 ms
5 p4-0.level3.mclnva02.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.9.54) 1.596 ms 1.526 ms 1.526 ms
6 ae0-54.mp2.Washington1.Level3.net (64.159.18.98) 2.143 ms 2.110 ms 2.067 ms
7 so-0-2-0.mp1.Tampa1.Level3.net (209.247.11.201) 44.089 ms 44.081 ms 44.109 ms
8 gige6-0.hsipaccess1.Tampa1.Level3.net (64.159.1.6) 44.379 ms 57.039 ms 44.351 ms
9 unknown.Level3.net (63.208.0.94) 31.226 ms 37.816 ms 35.811 ms
10 64.159.90.13 (64.159.90.13) 32.314 ms 30.882 ms 31.006 ms

vic451 · Post by **vic451** » Wed Feb 06, 2002 10:07 am

Wow , My tracert looks really odd . It seems like for one i have extra hops and for two all the ping times are basically the same . Plus the lost hops . Well all this plus more probably equals why i have to reload the pages so much and why my connection has weird latencies at times whil gaming .

Kip Patterson · Post by **Kip Patterson** » Wed Feb 06, 2002 10:40 am

The hops aren't "lost". The absence of pings is an intentional choice by the owner of the router. Has no impact upon your performance.

Kip

vic451 · Post by **vic451** » Wed Feb 06, 2002 11:21 am

thanks for the tip kip

BlackSword · Post by **BlackSword** » Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:24 pm

Originally posted by Kip Patterson
The hops aren't "lost". The absence of pings is an intentional choice by the owner of the router. Has no impact upon your performance.

Kip

correct,,,,

Vic451, My point was I don't belive your ping results from a speed point of view; but if they are true you have the best connection to the internet I have ever seen for a home connection that is. lol, not that I go around checking everyones home connection.

Putting it another way, I would take your connection.

vic451 · Post by **vic451** » Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:35 pm

I believe that i've figured out my weird results . My ip isn't on the traceroute at all that's comcasts new proxy . That D@mn proxy has screwed all the sites that detect my ip for identity , and i cannot renew my virus definitions .

earthmofo · Post by **earthmofo** » Sat Feb 09, 2002 12:13 am

You think yours are weird look at this with cox.net.

C:\tracert http://www.speedguide.net

Tracing route to http://www.speedguide.net [161.58.189.81]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 * * * Request timed out.
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 * * * Request timed out.
5 * * * Request timed out.
6 * * * Request timed out.
7 * * * Request timed out.
8 * * * Request timed out.
9 * * * Request timed out.
10 * * * Request timed out.
11 * * * Request timed out.
12 * * * Request timed out.
13 * * * Request timed out.
14 41 ms 39 ms 40 ms 161.58.189.81

Trace complete.

I have no connection or speed problems.

BaLa · Post by **BaLa** » Sat Feb 09, 2002 5:06 am

earthmofo; do you have the newest firmware on your router?

if you "downgrade" it to teh previous version it will fix your tracert probs

Kip Patterson · Post by **Kip Patterson** » Sat Feb 09, 2002 7:57 am

Yes, you are going through their proxy for browsing. Our server sees the proxy's IP, not yours.

But, the proxy is only used for browsing. Your trace route doesn't go through it.

I'm not sure what the deal is with the pings being in increments of 10ms, but I've seen it before. The numbers are probably correct, +/- 5 ms. No reason why you shouldn't see very low pings for that path.

Kip

earthmofo · Post by **earthmofo** » Sat Feb 09, 2002 4:46 pm

Originally posted by BaLa
earthmofo; do you have the newest firmware on your router?

if you "downgrade" it to teh previous version it will fix your tracert probs

I upgraded the Linksys firmware last week to 1.42.3. I will try and downgrade it. Thanks for the info.

earthmofo · Post by **earthmofo** » Sat Feb 09, 2002 4:57 pm

Just downgraded the Linksys firmware back to 1.40.2 and solved the tracett problem. BaLa, why does the new firmware affect the tracert like that???

C:\tracert http://www.speedguide.net

Tracing route to http://www.speedguide.net [161.58.189.81]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 14 ms 10 ms 10 ms 10.1.160.1
2 9 ms 9 ms 10 ms 68.9.8.41
3 21 ms 9 ms 10 ms 68.9.14.13
4 9 ms 9 ms 29 ms 68.1.0.48
5 26 ms 24 ms 21 ms 68.1.0.28
6 27 ms 27 ms 26 ms 12.124.234.77
7 26 ms 28 ms 27 ms gbr6-p80.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.123.9.62]
8 38 ms 36 ms 37 ms 12.122.11.173
9 28 ms 26 ms 26 ms ggr1-p340.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.11.234]
10 30 ms 68 ms 29 ms att-gw.dc.verio.net [192.205.32.210]
11 42 ms 39 ms 43 ms p4-6-1-0.r00.stngva01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.4.217]
12 42 ms 38 ms 38 ms ge-4-1.c00.stngva01.us.ah.vwh.net [129.250.27.184]
13 67 ms 37 ms 38 ms 161.58.156.173
14 46 ms 40 ms 38 ms 161.58.189.81

Trace complete.

Kip Patterson · Post by **Kip Patterson** » Sat Feb 09, 2002 6:08 pm

Because Linksys is like Cracker Jacks - a surprise in every package.

They just don't seem to do much of a job of testing their software before release.

Kip

vic451 · Post by **vic451** » Sat Feb 09, 2002 6:35 pm

Actually the 6th hop that i censored . I realized is actually the ip of the proxy as detected by a couple of different proxy detectors. So it still goes through the proxy no matter what.

ispark · Post by **ispark** » Sun Feb 10, 2002 12:52 pm

lol, here is mine to speedguide

for what it's worth.

Tracing route to http://www.speedguide.net [161.58.189.81]

over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 * * * Request timed out.

2 76 ms 80 ms 80 ms scscon-gwy.infoave.net [204.116.70.1]

3 76 ms 80 ms 80 ms atm1-0-9090303.r01.ncchrl.infoave.net [165.166.138.50]

4 82 ms 80 ms 80 ms atm8-0-7.gwy.ncchrl.infoave.net [165.166.126.148]

5 90 ms 84 ms 85 ms 12.124.58.61

6 87 ms 88 ms 89 ms gbr5-p80.attga.ip.att.net [12.123.21.74]

7 86 ms 84 ms 85 ms gbr4-p100.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.5.42]

8 98 ms 99 ms 101 ms gbr4-p30.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.2.226]

9 100 ms 100 ms 98 ms ggr1-p370.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.123.9.53]

10 98 ms 101 ms 98 ms att-gw.dc.verio.net [192.205.32.210]

11 116 ms 121 ms 114 ms p4-6-1-0.r00.stngva01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.4.217]

12 112 ms 114 ms 115 ms ge-4-1.c00.stngva01.us.ah.vwh.net [129.250.27.184]

13 117 ms 114 ms 116 ms 161.58.156.173

14 113 ms 115 ms 115 ms http://www.speedguide.net [161.58.189.81]

Trace complete.

I can only dream of the day I see speeds like you guys get.

SG Broadband Community

Check my tracert results ?

Check my tracert results ?

Re: Check my tracert results ?

Re: Check my tracert results ?