About the AMD Petition

Jin · Post by **Jin** » Wed Sep 05, 2001 11:44 pm

I was just looking at some of the signatures and I saw one that said Intel's anal buttcheek. If you don't believe me then goto it and look at signature number 301.

gmcd33 · Post by **gmcd33** » Wed Sep 05, 2001 11:49 pm

Damn, I meant to post anal butt crack.

Oh well

keeper · Post by **keeper** » Thu Sep 06, 2001 12:32 pm

Years ago I got a 366 Mhz Compaq w/ AMD processor. was a good price.

Ran a diagnostic & learned it was actually a 250 Mhz, but 'rated' at 366 Mhz.

Stayed away from AMD ever since. AMD has long since lost their Credibility.

AMD will NEVER get the chance to burn me again.

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Thu Sep 06, 2001 12:35 pm

Originally posted by keeper
Years ago I got a 366 Mhz Compaq w/ AMD processor. was a good price.

Ran a diagnostic & learned it was actually a 250 Mhz, but 'rated' at 366 Mhz.

Stayed away from AMD ever since. AMD has long since lost their Credibility.

AMD will NEVER get the chance to burn me again.

sure that wasnt compaq doing it?

Brent · Post by **Brent** » Thu Sep 06, 2001 1:10 pm

I was t here during all that PR rating stuff

and I guess I was an informed individual cause I knew all about it back then and made my decisions accordingly....

That really proves you gotta research what you are buying so you know for certain what it is

Back then Intel WAS the chip to own, no question about it it was the best, and most expensive as well, but the fastest indeed....

AMD has come a long way though

i just really hope they realize their error of their ways if they go back to the PR rating, that will NOT be good for them....