Trying to improve ping but no success so far

Get help and discuss anything related to tweaking your internet connection, as well as the different tools and registry patches on the site. TCP Optimizer settings and Analyzer results should be posted here.
Post Reply
Limite
New Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 11:22 am

Trying to improve ping but no success so far

Post by Limite »

Hi, I've been trying to improve my ping times lately but haven't had much success so far. I've only been able to get shave off ~1 ms in general with the config below, which is good but maybe there's more that can be done about it.

My network speed is usually ~3.75Mbit [down] / ~0.60Mbit(max) - ~0.30Mbit(min) [up] depending on the day, hour, server, etc..
my config is
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 05.31.2011 14:57
IP address: 85.55.xxx.xx
Client OS: Windows XP

TCP options string: 020405500103030001010402
MSS: 1360
MTU: 1400
TCP Window: 32640 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 0 bits
Unscaled RWIN : 65280
Recommended RWINs: 65280, 130560, 261120, 522240, 1044480
BDP limit (200ms): 1306kbps (163KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 522kbps (65KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 46
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
In addition to trying several configs, I've also done several tracerts and found a hop (the second) which is always present and adds a lot of latency but I don't know to who it belongs to, I thought it was a server that belonged to my ISP but the IP's of the servers from my isp usually start with 62...

Code: Select all

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert google.com

Tracing route to google.com [209.85.227.104]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.0.1       router
[color="#ff0000"] [B] 2    40 ms    39 ms    39 ms  172.31.255.254   ??????[/B][/color]
  3    39 ms    40 ms    39 ms  62.36.169.142     ISP
  4    43 ms    43 ms    44 ms  62.36.202.238     ISP
  5    50 ms    45 ms    48 ms  62.36.187.77       ISP
  6    45 ms    45 ms    55 ms  81.52.179.201     etc..
  7    90 ms    60 ms    61 ms  xe-4-0-1-0.auvtr3.Aubervilliers.opentransit.net
[193.251.132.177]
  8    86 ms    86 ms    85 ms  google-3.GW.opentransit.net [193.251.254.98]
  9    66 ms    66 ms   103 ms  209.85.250.142
 10    66 ms    66 ms    70 ms  216.239.43.233
 11    74 ms    75 ms    71 ms  216.239.49.45
 12    74 ms    87 ms    68 ms  209.85.243.89
 13    72 ms    67 ms    66 ms  wy-in-f104.1e100.net [209.85.227.104]

Trace complete.
User avatar
trogers
SG VIP
Posts: 12323
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: Bangkok, Thailand

Post by trogers »

Log into your router to check if connection is interleaved DSL.

If so, ping times at hop 2 are correct. Only non-interleaved signals give ping times below 20ms at the modem.
"Contentment is not the fulfillment of what you want, but is the realisation of how much you already have" - anon
Limite
New Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 11:22 am

Post by Limite »

Yes, the channel mode is set to interleaved which is the only mode my ISP supports right now unfortunately. So I guess the only solution is to get another ISP that offers other channel modes, right? :(
User avatar
trogers
SG VIP
Posts: 12323
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: Bangkok, Thailand

Post by trogers »

Limite wrote:Yes, the channel mode is set to interleaved which is the only mode my ISP supports right now unfortunately. So I guess the only solution is to get another ISP that offers other channel modes, right? :(

Interleaved signals are employed in areas where the phone lines are rather old, to reduce signal errors.

If the phone lines in your neighborhood is in such a state, other providers will probably also need to run their system on interleaved mode.
"Contentment is not the fulfillment of what you want, but is the realisation of how much you already have" - anon
Limite
New Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 11:22 am

Post by Limite »

trogers wrote:Interleaved signals are employed in areas where the phone lines are rather old, to reduce signal errors.

If the phone lines in your neighborhood is in such a state, other providers will probably also need to run their system on interleaved mode.

I live in a city where some providers offer a fastpath mode so I guess the phone lines are in good state. Maybe my current ISP doesn't want to use other channel modes to reduce cost or something.
Post Reply