f@h dual core questions

SG Distributed Computing Teams discussion, S.E.T.I., Folding@Home, as well as other types of cloud/distributed computing, AI, machine learning, cryptocurrency mining.
Post Reply
User avatar
Humboldt
Posts: 28220
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Northern CA

f@h dual core questions

Post by Humboldt »

I know you can set up dual core processors to run 2 different instances of f@h.

Just upgraded from a single core 1.8 GHz to a dual 3.0 GHz.

What's the difference between setting up 2 instances of the regular client, or running the SMP client?

Thanks
User avatar
Humboldt
Posts: 28220
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Northern CA

Post by Humboldt »

Stanford does say about the SMP client :
We strongly suggest people run this client on 4-core boxes. While it will run on 2-core boxes, we have noticed some potential problems (we are looking into these issues now).
Thanks
User avatar
YARDofSTUF
Posts: 70006
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 12:00 am
Location: USA

Post by YARDofSTUF »

I haven't run any F@H stuff for a while but the SMP client has always been problematic on dual core/Hyperthreaded CPUs.

EDIT: Not sure if you have a Dual core or a Single core with Hyperthreading, but if its the Single core then except the hyperthreaded core to be much slower at folding than your real core.

If you have a dual core CPU w/ hyperthreading you should have 4 separate boxes in the task manager performance section if I remember right.
User avatar
Humboldt
Posts: 28220
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Northern CA

Post by Humboldt »

YARDofSTUF wrote:I haven't run any F@H stuff for a while but the SMP client has always been problematic on dual core/Hyperthreaded CPUs.

EDIT: Not sure if you have a Dual core or a Single core with Hyperthreading, but if its the Single core then except the hyperthreaded core to be much slower at folding than your real core.

If you have a dual core CPU w/ hyperthreading you should have 4 separate boxes in the task manager performance section if I remember right.
How can I tell, sort of pulling the fan and heat sink off to look at the processor?
User avatar
YARDofSTUF
Posts: 70006
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 12:00 am
Location: USA

Post by YARDofSTUF »

http://www.piriform.com/speccy

What does speccy say for your "Cores", "Threads", and the "Specification" info?

(Yay 2 speccy posts in 2 days!)
User avatar
Humboldt
Posts: 28220
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Northern CA

Post by Humboldt »

YARDofSTUF wrote:http://www.piriform.com/speccy

What does speccy say for your "Cores", "Threads", and the "Specification" info?

(Yay 2 speccy posts in 2 days!)
Huh, so I was wrong, it's a single core w/ HT.

Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz
Prescott

Speccy look good, thanks for the tip...easier tho read than Belarc
User avatar
Humboldt
Posts: 28220
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Northern CA

Post by Humboldt »

Lots of cool features, although it does read one of my internal hdds running at over 100C.
User avatar
YARDofSTUF
Posts: 70006
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 12:00 am
Location: USA

Post by YARDofSTUF »

Hah, 100C has to be wrong. Maybe try flipping to F and back to C.

So a 3ghz w/HT, you should definitely run the single core client, you can run 2 instances. The 2nd one will be much slower though.
User avatar
Humboldt
Posts: 28220
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Northern CA

Post by Humboldt »

got it, thanks
Post Reply