The Ramblin' Wreck is rolling 21-0...man, I can remember way back when, Clemson was a top 10 team almost every year but they look very bad so far.
Go Jackets!!!!!!
Ga. Tech vs. Clemson tonight
LOL ya gotta be kidding... as you can see a very sucky Clemson is starting to make a come back cause GT can't hold onto a good lead as usual.Roody wrote:Georgia Tech looks very, very good so far. I almost picked them to win the ACC and I wouldn't be surprised if they did.
GT is good but 15th? naw.... but I'm pulling for them to win so VATech can spank them at home and get a nice step up
Yes I almost picked them to win the ACC where a bunch of teams are grouped together. That said I did not pick them even though right now they are 2-0 which ultimately no matter how they do it is better then not being 2-0.Sava700 wrote:LOL ya gotta be kidding... as you can see a very sucky Clemson is starting to make a come back cause GT can't hold onto a good lead as usual.
GT is good but 15th? naw.... but I'm pulling for them to win so VATech can spank them at home and get a nice step up
some times that 2-0 doesn't mean squat depending on who those two teams were they beat... I'd rather be 1-1 getting beat by a good team and beating a decent team than beating two sucky teamsRoody wrote:Yes I almost picked them to win the ACC where a bunch of teams are grouped together. That said I did not pick them even though right now they are 2-0 which ultimately no matter how they do it is better then not being 2-0.
That's just insane talk Sava. You are in a much better situation being undefeated then you would be with a loss. In all my years of watching sports teams and their fans you are the first I ever heard who stated they would rather have a loss then a win which regardless of how you spun it is exactly what you just did. I can tell you one thing.Sava700 wrote:some times that 2-0 doesn't mean squat depending on who those two teams were they beat... I'd rather be 1-1 getting beat by a good team and beating a decent team than beating two sucky teams
You got some bizarre ideas on the world of sports. We aren't talking about 1 non-bcs and 1 bcs team. We are talking about 2 BCS teams and in every scenario the undefeated team is in a much better situation.
Roody wrote:That's just insane talk Sava. You are in a much better situation being undefeated then you would be with a loss. In all my years of watching sports teams and their fans you are the first I ever heard who stated they would rather have a loss then a win which regardless of how you spun it is exactly what you just did. I can tell you one thing.
You got some bizarre ideas on the world of sports. We aren't talking about 1 non-bcs and 1 bcs team. We are talking about 2 BCS teams and in every scenario the undefeated team is in a much better situation.
hmm... how about an example... Florida with a 1 loss vs Boise St being undefeated... you do the math.
Which part of me saying we aren't talking about 1 non-bcs team vs. 1 bcs team is confusing?Sava700 wrote:hmm... how about an example... Florida with a 1 loss vs Boise St being undefeated... you do the math.
Use some common sense Sava. If BSU had been a BCS team then they would have played for the title. We know this to be a fact due to the contract BCS conferences have with the title game. Non-BCS teams don't have that kind of contract so once again your idea is insane. Give me an example of where being a undefeated BCS team is worse then being a 1 loss BCS team.
I was only referencing a team against another team... but doesn't matterRoody wrote:Which part of me saying we aren't talking about 1 non-bcs team vs. 1 bcs team is confusing?
Use some common sense Sava. If BSU had been a BCS team then they would have played for the title. We know this to be a fact due to the contract BCS conferences have with the title game. Non-BCS teams don't have that kind of contract so once again your idea is insane. Give me an example of where being a undefeated BCS team is worse then being a 1 loss BCS team.
