Son Forced To Rape Mom

Prey521 · Post by **Prey521** » Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:29 pm

WTF? There's a special and painful place in hell for sick and evil people like this!

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,288512,00.html

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — Two teenagers were accused of gang raping a woman and forcing her 12-year-old son to join in the attack, then beating him and pouring cleaning solution into his eyes..........

The victims told police they were forced back into their home and beaten and sexually assaulted. According to authorities, the men raped, sodomized and beat the woman, then forced her son to participate in the assault at gunpoint, making him have sex with his mother in front of them.

Ugh, that's sickening!!

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:42 pm

Saw it on another board. Time to rape them all with hot pokers.

trogers · Post by **trogers** » Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:46 pm

Karma will rule that they be reincarnated to be women and be at the receiving end.

Jamie_R · Post by **Jamie_R** » Sat Jul 07, 2007 6:56 am

w t f

lonewolfz28 · Post by **lonewolfz28** » Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:35 am

Oldest one is 16.

Where's that "Are kids really worse these days" thread again?

The idea of someone even suggesting doing something like this in 1986 when I was 16 is unfathomable. Any friend of mine who even brought up the idea would've been looked at as if they were nuts.

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Sat Jul 07, 2007 9:22 am

Sava700 · Post by **Sava700** » Sat Jul 07, 2007 10:50 am

tarpoon75 · Post by **tarpoon75** » Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:52 am

WTF!?!?!!?!?!?

That is one of the most disturbing things I have ever read, that poor family is never going to be ok.

Leatherneck · Post by **Leatherneck** » Sat Jul 07, 2007 1:34 pm

lonewolfz28 wrote: Where's that "Are kids really worse these days" thread again?

Also saw the 11 year old girl who led the police on a car chase while she was drunk! I guess that is no worse than me playing with G.I. Joes and Matchboxes in the dirt when I was that age.

jeremyboycool · Post by **jeremyboycool** » Sat Jul 07, 2007 2:47 pm

lonewolfz28 wrote:Oldest one is 16.

Where's that "Are kids really worse these days" thread again?

The idea of someone even suggesting doing something like this in 1986 when I was 16 is unfathomable. Any friend of mine who even brought up the idea would've been looked at as if they were nuts.

1986 ?

jeremyboycool · Post by **jeremyboycool** » Sat Jul 07, 2007 3:25 pm

lonewolfz28

Stuff like this did happen in 1986.

lonewolfz28 · Post by **lonewolfz28** » Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:24 pm

jeremyboycool wrote:lonewolfz28

Stuff like this did happen in 1986.

Not where I grew up.

Of course, I didn't know what cocaine was when they asked me if I'd ever done it either.

RoundEye · Post by **RoundEye** » Sat Jul 07, 2007 6:17 pm

lonewolfz28 wrote:....Where's that "Are kids really worse these days" thread again? ....

ugg…….

This is going to be hard for me to explain properly, but I’ll give it a try, so please bare with me.

I guess I base my thoughts on scientific theory. What I think today is what I believe to be true. Now, until I’m shown valid proof that I’m wrong, I will continue to think that way.

What is known today as the gospel truth, will be shattered tomorrow. The atom could not be split and made any smaller until the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima.

Just because you were a good kid, does not mean the entire world was good back then either. Until we can rule out the rise in population, instant world wide media attention, and your wider view of the world around you as an adult, it’s really difficult to prove or disprove that “kids are worse these days”.

Now all that being said, yes by far this is an atrocious crime, but as pointed out in the other thread to me, is it really that kids are worse these days or an indication that we as adults have failed our children and are about to experience the downfall of our civilization?

I think a better question would have been “As a percentage, are more kids worse today then in past history in respect to our rise in population and modern world wide media attention?”. But a thread titled like that would have fallen flat on its face. It’s too deep well of a thought for our shallow pool of a mind.

In becoming a wordsmith, I have also been studying how to evoke human emotion through printed media. Such as Stephen King’s ability to instill fear and horror in his readers, my thoughts and ideas on that would probably blow your balls right out of their sack.

Now I ask, does my reply confuse you, piss you off or make you think I’m completely nuts?

Just keep in mind the decision you make is only an observation, in a theory you have about me, and that could change at any moment if you keep an open mind.

Leatherneck · Post by **Leatherneck** » Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:26 pm

Sure, Elvis was Evil for swaying hips and kids that smoked & rode motorcycles were rebels. Perception and time periods have a lot to do with it. Of course parents are in the mix along with other societal ills, but I still believe the selfish, prideful, disrespectful attitudes of kids these days "seems" more prevalent than ever.

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:28 pm

Interesting turn going on in this thread.

Rivas · Post by **Rivas** » Sun Jul 08, 2007 12:44 am

Joe · Post by **Joe** » Sun Jul 08, 2007 1:10 am

Not sure how even posting irrelevant and disgusting things like this is necessary. We should ask philip to add 'disturbing posts to date:" under everyones name.

Prey521 · Post by **Prey521** » Sun Jul 08, 2007 1:12 am

Joe wrote:Not sure how even posting irrelevant and disgusting things like this is necessary. We should ask philip to add 'disturbing posts to date:" under everyones name.

Huh?

jeremyboycool · Post by **jeremyboycool** » Sun Jul 08, 2007 1:50 am

Indy · Post by **Indy** » Sun Jul 08, 2007 2:44 am

Massa · Post by **Massa** » Sun Jul 08, 2007 5:15 am

RoundEye wrote:ugg…….

This is going to be hard for me to explain properly, but I’ll give it a try, so please bare with me.

I guess I base my thoughts on scientific theory. What I think today is what I believe to be true. Now, until I’m shown valid proof that I’m wrong, I will continue to think that way.

What is known today as the gospel truth, will be shattered tomorrow. The atom could not be split and made any smaller until the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima.

Just because you were a good kid, does not mean the entire world was good back then either. Until we can rule out the rise in population, instant world wide media attention, and your wider view of the world around you as an adult, it’s really difficult to prove or disprove that “kids are worse these days”.

Now all that being said, yes by far this is an atrocious crime, but as pointed out in the other thread to me, is it really that kids are worse these days or an indication that we as adults have failed our children and are about to experience the downfall of our civilization?

I think a better question would have been “As a percentage, are more kids worse today then in past history in respect to our rise in population and modern world wide media attention?”. But a thread titled like that would have fallen flat on its face. It’s too deep well of a thought for our shallow pool of a mind.

In becoming a wordsmith, I have also been studying how to evoke human emotion through printed media. Such as Stephen King’s ability to instill fear and horror in his readers, my thoughts and ideas on that would probably blow your balls right out of their sack.

Now I ask, does my reply confuse you, piss you off or make you think I’m completely nuts?

Just keep in mind the decision you make is only an observation, in a theory you have about me, and that could change at any moment if you keep an open mind.

This whole phenomenon is known as the Actor - Observer Bias and is well documented throughout the social sciences, and was actually originally cited when studying this exact supposition, which was proven to be baseless.

RoundEye · Post by **RoundEye** » Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:38 pm

Massa wrote:This whole phenomenon is known as the Actor - Observer Bias and is well documented throughout the social sciences, and was actually originally cited when studying this exact supposition, which was proven to be baseless.

I bow before thy great and powerful Massa and humble thy self to thou vast knowledge.

Help me understand the actor-observer bias some, in a hypothetical hurricane Katrina situation.

People observed looters in New Orleans though their TV and blamed it on their disposition as bad people.

Me being the actor in the situation, I defend it because “hey I had to eat, I was forced in to it!”.

Is my rough analogy right?

In my quest to become a better writer, other then the obvious mechanics of grammar, I want to understand the psychology of it. I want to master the ability to get inside somebody’s head and bungee jump from their primal nerves. To make their head rattle around in fear or shake from laughter. I think stirring emotions is my key to becoming a better writer.

In other words, I want to open up my readers skull and mind f**k them.

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:47 pm

I'd love to see a speedguide report soon, "Son forced to rape mom, everyone too busy with themselves to care"

9mmprincess · Post by **9mmprincess** » Sun Jul 08, 2007 7:08 pm

I wasn't going to post this, but everytime I come here and see this thread, it bothers me, because - how exactly do you FORCE a 12 yr old boy to rape someone? dont you need a hardon to actually commit rape? Not talking sexual assault here, they say actual rape, which I think of as you know.. intercourse. How is a terrified 12 yr old boy going to get an erection in that situation? I don't get it.

Massa · Post by **Massa** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:16 am

RoundEye wrote:I bow before thy great and powerful Massa and humble thy self to thou vast knowledge.

Help me understand the actor-observer bias some, in a hypothetical hurricane Katrina situation.

People observed looters in New Orleans though their TV and blamed it on their disposition as bad people.

Me being the actor in the situation, I defend it because “hey I had to eat, I was forced in to it!”.

Is my rough analogy right?

In my quest to become a better writer, other then the obvious mechanics of grammar, I want to understand the psychology of it. I want to master the ability to get inside somebody’s head and bungee jump from their primal nerves. To make their head rattle around in fear or shake from laughter. I think stirring emotions is my key to becoming a better writer.

In other words, I want to open up my readers skull and mind f**k them.

What I was referring to actually (sorry I wasn't clear) was the "kids these days are worse" phenomenon. In this sense we blame the nasty acts of kids these days on internal motivations, and them being generally "worse" people than we were at that age, when in fact it's just a bias most people show. We view our own bad behavior as externally motivated, the environment forced us to be bad, kids these days on the other hand are just bad eggs. Your analogy is correct, and it's an interesting way to consider how people evaluate what they see. Sorry for the late response for some reason I didn't subscribe to the thread.

RoundEye · Post by **RoundEye** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:11 pm

Massa wrote:....Sorry for the late response for some reason I didn't subscribe to the thread....

Not a problem, thanks for the reply. I think to become a better writer it's imperative that I get inside my readers heads, understanding thier perception of things is key to that.

Check out this thread on perception I made.