It's on!!! Let's rock!!!

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 6:22 pm

Go Seahawks!!!!!!

Lefty · Post by **Lefty** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 6:40 pm

Pit is starting out looking foolish. 2 false starts

CableDude · Post by **CableDude** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:08 pm

Where are the cheerleaders!?

Lefty · Post by **Lefty** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:13 pm

That last Bud commercial had MD fapping (sheep streaker)

MadDoctor · Post by **MadDoctor** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:23 pm

Lefty wrote:That last Bud commercial had MD fapping (sheep streaker)

w00t!!!!!!!

Zerohero · Post by **Zerohero** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:47 pm

Am I The Only One That Saw That Bs Touchdown!!!???

9mmprincess · Post by **9mmprincess** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:51 pm

what kkind of BULL**** call was that?

Zerohero · Post by **Zerohero** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:52 pm

9mmprincess wrote:what kkind of BULL**** call was that?

The guy was clearly not in the enzone yet they call a TD, sorry guys, but that was BS call number 2 for the home town.

Joe · Post by **Joe** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:52 pm

horrible call on the 'alleged' push off.. Same thing for Bens bogus touchdown.. bad calls this early.. dang

Dan · Post by **Dan** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:53 pm

I love the Bud Light "magic refrigerator" commercial. LOL

and Madoc is gonna love the "streaking sheep" commercial !!!!!!!!!!!

Zerohero · Post by **Zerohero** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:53 pm

Go Seattle!

TinyTim · Post by **TinyTim** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:59 pm

Zerohero wrote:Am I The Only One That Saw That Bs Touchdown!!!???

I guess it pays to hand a fat envelope to the refs before the game.

That was comlete crap as the ball was tucked...maybe just maybe did it reach the edge, but no way did it break it!

Lefty · Post by **Lefty** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:02 pm

switched momentum. at first pit looked confused, now s-hawks blew it at the end of the half.

Lefty · Post by **Lefty** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:03 pm

I thought the Ben TD was weak.

Mactron · Post by **Mactron** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:04 pm

Push the ball over the line, and a TD !?? What ever.

Go Seahawks!!!!!!

64bit · Post by **64bit** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:06 pm

eesh what a crappy half of football. Seattle should be running away with this game....

Joe · Post by **Joe** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:07 pm

Even those broadcasters agree that was a bogus td call.

Kyle · Post by **Kyle** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:21 pm

Geriatric rock and roll... Amazing...

Lefty · Post by **Lefty** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:27 pm

Kyle wrote:Geriatric rock and roll... Amazing...

They came out in 1962, the year I was born. I'm not old per say but would be for a rocker. and that doesn't include the years that got them there.

Duzmor · Post by **Duzmor** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:30 pm

I remember when it Came Out in 1962-

"I think it was 1962"

Duz

Zerohero · Post by **Zerohero** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:34 pm

WTF SEATLE !!? They just let the guy walk down the field easy

Scott · Post by **Scott** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:38 pm

Zerohero wrote:WTF SEATLE !!? They just let the guy walk down the field easy

Yeah, they just "let" him. Had nothing to do with talent or speed.

Zerohero · Post by **Zerohero** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:42 pm

Scott wrote:Yeah, they just "let" him. Had nothing to do with talent or speed.

Well after #28 missed his tackle YES they "let" him walk down the lane.

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:56 pm

Score?

Zerohero · Post by **Zerohero** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:56 pm

Interception play was awsome. You gotta agree to that though

If I offended anyone, sorry I get really into the super bowl.

Zerohero · Post by **Zerohero** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:56 pm

YARDofSTUF wrote:Score?

10 - 14 now, thanks to a interception play.

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:57 pm

Joe wrote:Even those broadcasters agree that was a bogus td call.

A possible sign that the aliens are involved!

CableDude · Post by **CableDude** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:58 pm

Kyle wrote:Geriatric rock and roll... Amazing...

Mick Jagger

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:58 pm

Zerohero wrote:10 - 14 now, thanks to a interception play.

Thats it? bah.

Zerohero · Post by **Zerohero** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:24 pm

Seatle just threw a interseption pass

Joe · Post by **Joe** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:25 pm

Yet even more bad reffing... Holding on that pass play? And now they call hassellback for a block below the waist??? WTF!!! OMG REFS GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS! Horrible reffing going on here... judas!

Zerohero · Post by **Zerohero** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:35 pm

FUMBLE... it's over pack your bags guys.

Bouncer · Post by **Bouncer** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 10:07 pm

WOW!

What a game! I'm not a huge fan of either team, but what a back and forth! And Congratulations to the PITTSBURGH STEELERS!!!

Humboldt · Post by **Humboldt** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 10:11 pm

eh, can't say I feel the same way. Not one of the better ones to watch IMO. Neither side had any momentum. The suspense was good but not the action.

64bit · Post by **64bit** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:21 pm

Humboldt wrote:eh, can't say I feel the same way. Not one of the better ones to watch IMO. Neither side had any momentum. The suspense was good but not the action.

Feel the same way. Im suprised they were even able to hand out a MVP tropy. No one really distinguished themselves on either side.

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:39 pm

Agrees with Bouncer...What a game! Congrats to the Steelers! What a rollercoaster of a ride!

Seattle almost brought their A game. Some of them just forgot that they can't hold....Otherwise I think it would have gone the other way if they could have held the penalties down.

Starmax · Post by **Starmax** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:30 am

Zerohero wrote:Am I The Only One That Saw That Bs Touchdown!!!???

you saw that too huh?

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:34 am

Dunno if it was or wasn't. The ball only has to break the plane of the goal line. The problem is...the camera angle was up above and slightly behind. We don't have a way of telling and quit possibly, neither did the review...

Starmax · Post by **Starmax** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:36 am

downhill wrote:Dunno if it was or wasn't. The ball only has to break the plane of the goal line. The problem is...the camera angle was up above and slightly behind. We don't have a way of telling and quit possibly, neither did the review...

very true..

Sava700 · Post by **Sava700** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:42 am

I don't like either team but it was obvious from the beginning that Stealers were going to win... won my 20$ for the week