Hey Redskins fans...

WhoNut · Post by **WhoNut** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 9:49 am

Ready for your season to be over?

TonyT · Post by **TonyT** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:20 am

ouch!

Seattle is waterlogged...and just may sink.

ScottE · Post by **ScottE** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:24 am

TonyT wrote:ouch!

Seattle is waterlogged...and just may sink.

Maybe when California falls into the ocean it'll take Oregon and Washington with it?

Sava700 · Post by **Sava700** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:25 am

hmm i don't know what your talkin about.. Washington will easily win this game and continue on to win the superbowl.

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:31 am

Sava700 wrote:hmm i don't know what your talkin about.. Washington will easily win this game and continue on to win the superbowl.

If they can shut down the running game like the last meet and.......if Seattle's recievers keep dropping the ball, then yes, Washington stands a chance of beating them or at least, making it an interesting game.

Fat chance.

knightmare · Post by **knightmare** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:32 am

what is the spread on the game, my guess would be Seattle by 8?

Jamie_R · Post by **Jamie_R** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:36 am

I'm pulling for Washington because if they win, and my Panthers win, the NFC championship game will be in Charlotte ...

then the Redskins season will be over

WhoNut · Post by **WhoNut** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:40 am

Sava700 wrote:hmm i don't know what your talkin about.. Washington will easily win this game and continue on to win the superbowl.

It's a bit early in the day for crack isn't it?

WhoNut · Post by **WhoNut** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:43 am

TonyT wrote:ouch!

Seattle is waterlogged...and just may sink.

You're not kidding. Today is the 27th day in a row with rain. The record is 33!

Lefty · Post by **Lefty** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:48 am

knightmare wrote:what is the spread on the game, my guess would be Seattle by 8?

WASH 41 O/U
SEA -8.5
~~~~~~~~~~
NE 44 O/U
DEN -3
~~~~~~~~~~
PIT 47.5 O/U
INDY -9.5
~~~~~~~~~~
CAR 30.5 O/U
CHI -3

Didn't know I was a bookie did you:2cool:

WhoNut · Post by **WhoNut** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:27 pm

No 'skins fans on the board this morning?

I'm not surprised. They're probably sleeping off last nights Michelob binge. By the time they wake up and wash their mullets, it'll be half-time.

Jamie_R · Post by **Jamie_R** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 2:50 pm

WhoNut wrote:No 'skins fans on the board this morning?

I'm not surprised. They're probably sleeping off last nights Michelob binge. By the time they wake up and wash their mullets, it'll be half-time.

Sava700 · Post by **Sava700** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 3:25 pm

WhoNut wrote:It's a bit early in the day for crack isn't it?

naw thats for after the game when washington wins

Joe · Post by **Joe** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 3:58 pm

Ill be going for washington after this post... hmmph :2cool:

knightmare · Post by **knightmare** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:22 pm

Lefty wrote:WASH 41 O/U
SEA -8.5
~~~~~~~~~~
NE 44 O/U
DEN -3
~~~~~~~~~~
PIT 47.5 O/U
INDY -9.5
~~~~~~~~~~
CAR 30.5 O/U
CHI -3

Didn't know I was a bookie did you:2cool:

I didn't till i saw your parlay card sticking out in your front pocket..lol

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:45 pm

Well it was fugly but Seattle is in the NFC championship!!

Go Hawks!!!!!!

ScottE · Post by **ScottE** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:47 pm

I seriously fell asleep during that game.

WhoNut · Post by **WhoNut** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 8:48 pm

"Fugly?"

Nope, not at all. They lose the NFL MVP for the game and win 20-10... That's beauty!!

GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

WhoNut · Post by **WhoNut** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 8:49 pm

Joe wrote:Ill be going for washington after this post... hmmph :2cool:

Whaa?

Lefty · Post by **Lefty** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 8:51 pm

downhill wrote:Well it was fugly but Seattle is in the NFC championship!!

Go Hawks!!!!!!

not yet, these were div, if they win next week they are NFC champs. and go to the Bowl

Sava700 · Post by **Sava700** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 9:10 pm

WhoNut wrote:"Fugly?"

Nope, not at all. They lose the NFL MVP for the game and win 20-10... That's beauty!!

GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

losing the MVP isn't a good thing considering they will need that player for the next game.... Both teams played well.. a NFC team should win the super bowl no matter who.

RoscoPColtrane · Post by **RoscoPColtrane** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 9:21 pm

LOL are you serious? Any of the top 4 AFC could beat the TOP 1 NFC. I think seatle will represent the NFC in the s/b but it would take a serious flop of an afc team for them to win it!

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 9:43 pm

Lefty wrote:not yet, these were div, if they win next week they are NFC champs. and go to the Bowl

Next week, they play for the NFC championship, right? That is the gist of my post....

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 9:43 pm

RoscoPColtrane wrote:LOL are you serious? Any of the top 4 AFC could beat the TOP 1 NFC. I think seatle will represent the NFC in the s/b but it would take a serious flop of an afc team for them to win it!

They beat the Colts once already.....

RoscoPColtrane · Post by **RoscoPColtrane** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 9:51 pm

downhill wrote:They beat the Colts once already.....

True enough, look for another indy defeat tomorrow!!

GO STEELERS!!

Unholy · Post by **Unholy** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:05 pm

Go Bears!!!

Cali got nothing...

Rainbow · Post by **Rainbow** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:06 pm

Looks like New England is the next one to go home

RoscoPColtrane · Post by **RoscoPColtrane** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:24 pm

Rainbow wrote:Looks like New England is the next one to go home

C YA you worthless punks!!

GO STEELERS!!

Mad_Haggis · Post by **Mad_Haggis** » Sun Jan 15, 2006 3:42 am

Gibbs is good!

Jamie_R · Post by **Jamie_R** » Sun Jan 15, 2006 7:00 am

Rainbow wrote:Looks like New England is the next one to go home

YES !!!

I am so SICK of New England I can't stand it .... I don't wanna hear anything else about 'em, and I don't wanna see any more friggin' credit card commercials !!!!!

I did think it was funny at the beginning of the game how every time Brady got touched he wanted a flag, and every time a receiver didn't catch a pass they wanted a flag ...

mnosteele52 · Post by **mnosteele52** » Sun Jan 15, 2006 9:14 am

Well the Seahawks won because my Redskins' offense didn't show up again. I don't see the Seahawks going to the SuperBowl though, they just don't have a good enough team, I admit the Redskins really weren't good enough to go because of the offense, but I will always root for them, I have been a fan my entire life, a HUGE fan. The Seahawks are a good team, not a great team and had a pretty easy schedule this year. Never the less, congrats on the win, you guys did play a better game.

Bouncer · Post by **Bouncer** » Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:46 am

Dissapointing, but not entirely unexpected. The way I figure it, Redskins now have a truly solid defense and a pretty good offense. They have the running game covered between Betts and Portis. What they really need is to add another good WR to take some of the pressure off Randy Moss and to open up more opportunities, and they need a middle career QB to step in and take over for Brunell. He did well for a big part of the season, but he simply ran out of gas at the end. He needs to go back to being a back-up and bring in a QB who can throw and occaisionally scramble with some experience. I hate the Redskins having to put training wheels on their QB.

If they can put that together, I think they're good enough to go to the NFC championship next year.

Regards,
-Bouncer-

mnosteele52 · Post by **mnosteele52** » Sun Jan 15, 2006 11:30 am

Bouncer wrote:Dissapointing, but not entirely unexpected. The way I figure it, Redskins now have a truly solid defense and a pretty good offense. They have the running game covered between Betts and Portis. What they really need is to add another good WR to take some of the pressure off Randy Moss and to open up more opportunities, and they need a middle career QB to step in and take over for Brunell. He did well for a big part of the season, but he simply ran out of gas at the end. He needs to go back to being a back-up and bring in a QB who can throw and occaisionally scramble with some experience. I hate the Redskins having to put training wheels on their QB.

If they can put that together, I think they're good enough to go to the NFC championship next year.

Regards,
-Bouncer-

Exactly...... except it's Santana Moss.

I would like to see them go with Ramsey or Campbell, they are both young a might need "training wheels" for a bit but one of them will be the future QB for the Skins. And your 100% right about another good receiver, Cooley is a great short go to guy but we need another good one like Moss to take the pressure off of Moss, with a QB and a strong arm and another receiver we would go from a good team to a great team.

ScottE · Post by **ScottE** » Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:19 pm

[quote="mnosteele52"]Exactly...... except it's Santana Moss. ]

Your interior offensive line leaves a little something to be desired.

mnosteele52 · Post by **mnosteele52** » Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:30 pm

ScottE wrote:Your interior offensive line leaves a little something to be desired.

True, they need to beef it up a bit, but when they are all healthy they are pretty good. The won 6 straight games and a lot of them were playing with injuries. Plus the fact that Brunell isn't very mobile makes them look worse. I try and be honest when discussing the Redskins even though I'm a fan. With a QB that has a stronger arm and quicker release (as Brunell did early in the season) the O line does a fine job and a good passing game opens things up for Portis to run.

Bouncer · Post by **Bouncer** » Sun Jan 15, 2006 3:24 pm

ScottE wrote:Your interior offensive line leaves a little something to be desired.

Disagree. Brunell was rarely as hurried as many of his counterparts facing the Skins defense (by comparison). The problem was the recievers frequently couldn't break free because there weren't enough of them to force man to man. He had plenty of time to scan, scan, scan and THEN decide to run. There is always room for improvement, and you wish to have a line that can hold for days if need be. Thing is though, how many tipped balls did he have? How many hurry ups? How many sacks within five seconds?

The answer is, not many at all. He did get sacked, but almost always out of the pocket, while he was scrambling trying to make something out of nothing.

Oh, and mnosteele52, of course you're right. Dunno why I said Randy instead of Santana.

Regards,
-Bouncer-