Sexual Relations between siblings/cousins/step-siblings etc...

Brent · Post by **Brent** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:21 pm

Your thoughts?

CableDude · Post by **CableDude** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:24 pm

RoscoPColtrane · Post by **RoscoPColtrane** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:29 pm

sounds pretty friggin gross to me! why bring this up?

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:30 pm

RoscoPColtrane wrote:sounds pretty friggin gross to me! why bring this up?

Cuz his new 'girlfriend' is his cousin ?

CableDude · Post by **CableDude** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:30 pm

Cabledude wrote:

.

Bastid · Post by **Bastid** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:31 pm

blood=bad
step=weird territory

CableDude · Post by **CableDude** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:32 pm

Pics of my sister!

chimdogger · Post by **chimdogger** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:33 pm

Take it from a man that has family from West Virginia... Dont mess with bloodlines. You get ****ed up kids with 13 toes and the love of sheep balls.

Zilog B · Post by **Zilog B** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:33 pm

Cabledude wrote:Pics of my sister!

[IMG]http://img512.imageshack.us/img512/8029/elishacuthbert112tq.th.jpg[/IG]

If hitting that were wrong, I wouldn't want to be right.

chimdogger · Post by **chimdogger** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:35 pm

Cabledude wrote:Pics of my sister!

Holy ****. That is your Sis? How did you not cop a feel?

Oh wait she is blond...

Bastid · Post by **Bastid** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:36 pm

Zilog B wrote:If hitting that were wrong, I wouldn't want to be right.

Brent · Post by **Brent** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:36 pm

Bastid wrote:step=weird territory

weird territory maybe, but technically you aren't blood related, so ok?

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:39 pm

Cabledude wrote:Pics of my sister!

Liar

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:40 pm

Brent.....ask yourself.......Who would Jesus do ?

Rivas · Post by **Rivas** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:40 pm

its wrong

Rivas · Post by **Rivas** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:40 pm

Izzo wrote:Brent.....ask yourself.......Who would Jesus do ?

Zilog B · Post by **Zilog B** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:52 pm

Izzo wrote:Brent.....ask yourself.......Who would Jesus do ?

WWJD.... It would make a great bumper sticker

CableDude · Post by **CableDude** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:53 pm

Izzo wrote:Liar

Pic of my wife

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:56 pm

Zilog B wrote:WWJD.... It would make a great bumper sticker

I think you may be on something here

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:05 pm

Believe it or not, most states allow marriages between first cousins and I believe all do, between 2ond cousins....

The thought is, the genetic differences are great enough that there shouldn't be any problems.

In a very small community that hasn't had any mingling of their gene pool, is another story.

Other than that.......it's a Brent type of thread, no? Possibly a Freudian slip?

cybotron r_9 · Post by **cybotron r_9** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:10 pm

Cabledude wrote:Pic of my wife

OMG I Love her so...........did she have a boob job recently? cause her totoys seem to have gotten larger.

Bastid · Post by **Bastid** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:11 pm

Brent wrote:weird territory maybe, but technically you aren't blood related, so ok?

depends on the situation i suppose... if you were raised with this person as being your sibling, then imo, no. because it raises mental and moral questions...
if one of your parents just got with the parent of this step, then i think all is fair... but is still considered weird territory...

Blisster · Post by **Blisster** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:20 pm

I made out with a cousin once.

brembo · Post by **brembo** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:23 pm

Just makin sure my name didn't pop up in here.

Zilog B · Post by **Zilog B** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:23 pm

Blisster wrote:I made out with a cousin once.

Did his parents find out?

Post by **YeOldeStonecat** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:41 pm

Chlorination of the gene pool is considered a good thing.

Or are us northerners a minority in this belief?

RoscoPColtrane · Post by **RoscoPColtrane** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:49 pm

Zilog B wrote:Did his parents find out?

lmao!!

Shagster · Post by **Shagster** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 10:20 pm

Brent...Continually make rough contact between your head and your desk until you forget why you started this thread.

Brent · Post by **Brent** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 10:29 pm

I don't think any rules or laws should exist forbidding the union of sibling/cousin couples at all.

brembo · Post by **brembo** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 10:48 pm

Brent wrote:I don't think any rules or laws should exist forbidding the union of sibling/cousin couples at all.

What? And why?

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 10:54 pm

Brent wrote:I don't think any rules or laws should exist forbidding the union of sibling couples at all.

Throw your bible out the window then...

Paft · Post by **Paft** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 10:56 pm

Brent wrote:I don't think any rules or laws should exist forbidding the union of sibling/cousin couples at all.

Interesting standpoint, Brent. Care to expand on that belief?

Brent · Post by **Brent** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 10:59 pm

Sometimes there really is true love between siblings, or cousins, or whatever, why should our legal system say that should be illegal? doesn't make sense

this also goes for age, shouldn't be any laws on marriage or sex concerning age

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:02 pm

Brent...again, in most states, 1st cousins CAN marry.

Brent · Post by **Brent** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:02 pm

downhill wrote:Brent...again, in most states, 1st cousins CAN marry.

I believe in Texas it is outlawed as of this year. It's a growing trend. Our civil liberties are going away.

Paft · Post by **Paft** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:07 pm

Brent wrote:Sometimes there really is true love between siblings, or cousins, or whatever, why should our legal system say that should be illegal? doesn't make sense

this also goes for age, shouldn't be any laws on marriage or sex concerning age

You're correct that sometimes there is really true love between siblings/cousins/etc. But does that really mean that they should be allowed to marry? Justify your stance legally, Brent.. why should there not be a law in place to prevent marriage between relatives? Everything related to love could be done without marriage, such as homosexual couples or polyamorus circles have been forced to do for centuries in this country.

As for age: What system would you put in place to keep younger people from being manipulated or coerced into sex? How would you differentiate between uninformed non-consent, and rape? How would you define 'consentual' and 'unconsentual' sex, in cases of younger people?

When you make these statements.. justify them.

brembo · Post by **brembo** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:11 pm

Brent wrote:I believe in Texas it is outlawed as of this year. It's a growing trend. Our civil liberties are going away.

It was really never a civil liberty in the first place. I want my civil liberty of "stabbing people in the face" back...oh wait, never was one.

Breeding within one generation is asking for all sorts of genetic weirdness, get far back enough in the sticks around here and you can find the folks that have that lovin feeling for close relatives and the offspring is....different.

Think of it like DUI/DWI laws. MOST people have enough grey matter to know that driving around in a 5000 pound auto while drunk is a bad idea, and don't do so. It's that small percentage of people that just don't care or don't think thru the consequences that create the need for laws. Bit of a stretch true, but creating kids with severe mental deficiences, bizarre genetic mutations etc is a burden on society.

Sava700 · Post by **Sava700** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:14 pm

Cabledude wrote:Pics of my sister!

mehh if this was my step sister ohhh yeah i wouldn't think twice!

Brent · Post by **Brent** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:16 pm

Paft wrote:You're correct that sometimes there is really true love between siblings/cousins/etc. But does that really mean that they should be allowed to marry? Justify your stance legally, Brent.. why should there not be a law in place to prevent marriage between relatives? Everything related to love could be done without marriage, such as homosexual couples or polyamorus circles have been forced to do for centuries in this country.

As for age: What system would you put in place to keep younger people from being manipulated or coerced into sex? How would you differentiate between uninformed non-consent, and rape? How would you define 'consentual' and 'unconsentual' sex, in cases of younger people?

When you make these statements.. justify them.

lol

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:20 pm

Brent wrote:lol

So this exercise isn't about gathering info or discussing a subject but waiting for someone to take your bait and then ridicule them?

I do believe that falls within the guidelines of asking the members to not troll....