SG staff....

Brk · Post by **Brk** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 4:58 pm

Please stop PM'ing me.

Thanks!

Brent · Post by **Brent** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:04 pm

Brk · Post by **Brk** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:05 pm

Brent wrote:

Except I've done nothing wrong.

ghost · Post by **ghost** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:06 pm

brembo · Post by **brembo** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:20 pm

Burke wrote:Except I've done nothing wrong.

Ya know how many ex-cons I've run into that say the same thing? About 95% of them.

Brk · Post by **Brk** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:21 pm

brembo wrote:Ya know how many ex-cons I've run into that say the same thing? About 95% of them.

Maybe you should hang out in classier places.

Zilog B · Post by **Zilog B** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:24 pm

Burke wrote:Maybe you should hang out in classier places.

Hey, you can't ask the man to skip family reunions can ya?

Cypher · Post by **Cypher** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:29 pm

All of these PM's... and allegations... are... drivingmemad. /burke

Brk · Post by **Brk** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:50 pm

Cypher_138 wrote:All of these PM's... and allegations... are... drivingmemad. /burke

And that guy just won a Golden Globe!

Brent · Post by **Brent** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:52 pm

i see a new avatar potential

brembo · Post by **brembo** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:53 pm

Burke wrote:Maybe you should hang out in classier places.

Not my choice, just happens that alot of the properties that I survey are in questionable neighborhoods. I'm required by law to inform folks that I'll poking around thier property, meet oodles of interesting people that way. Hear some good stories too.

Sava700 · Post by **Sava700** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 6:04 pm

Brent wrote:i see a new avatar potential

NOOO.. I've sat here several times for I think 10mins at a time watchin the one you have now! LOL

Brent · Post by **Brent** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 6:05 pm

Sava700 wrote:NOOO.. I've sat here several times for I think 10mins at a time watchin the one you have now! LOL

too late

wee96 · Post by **wee96** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 6:15 pm

Brent wrote:too late

Sorry but the chest was MUCH more pleasent to look at...

Brent · Post by **Brent** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 6:24 pm

wee96 wrote:Sorry but the chest was MUCH more pleasent to look at...

heh

Cypher · Post by **Cypher** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 6:26 pm

Lookin sharp there Brent.

Brent · Post by **Brent** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 6:31 pm

wee96 wrote:Sorry but the chest was MUCH more pleasent to look at...

here is the full version of it, i had to chop it down some cause the file size was too big, damn the 15K avatar limit

Cypher · Post by **Cypher** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 6:39 pm

But she needs tassels.
That way it covers the areoles and provides hours of amusement for all.

wee96 · Post by **wee96** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 7:04 pm

Cypher_138 wrote:
But she needs tassels.
That way it covers the areoles and provides hours of amusement for all.

Meggie · Post by **Meggie** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 7:45 pm

Cypher_138 wrote:But she needs tassels.
That way it covers the areoles and provides hours of amusement for all.

areoles is such a funny word.

Dan · Post by **Dan** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 7:55 pm

Cypher · Post by **Cypher** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 7:58 pm

Meggie wrote:areoles is such a funny word.

cyberskye · Post by **cyberskye** » Wed Jan 19, 2005 9:33 pm

God loves that avatar

ghost · Post by **ghost** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 5:36 pm

Brent wrote:

I will be doing this tomorrow night.

CableDude · Post by **CableDude** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 6:45 pm

ghost wrote:I will be doing this tomorrow night.

You the man dawg.

Post by **Philip** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 10:04 pm

SG Staff must be able to communicate with you when necessary through email and/or PMs. It's a requirement of your registration.

ScottE · Post by **ScottE** » Tue Jan 25, 2005 4:41 pm

Meggie wrote:areoles is such a funny word.

It's areolas

Areoles is a part of a cactus.

Brk · Post by **Brk** » Tue Jan 25, 2005 8:09 pm

Philip wrote:SG Staff must be able to communicate with you when necessary through email and/or PMs. It's a requirement of your registration.

And if it's NOT necessary?

Post by **Philip** » Tue Jan 25, 2005 8:30 pm

Necessity is at the discretion of staff members... If you have a problem with the validity of a particular communication you can take it up to me or Ken.

Joint Chiefs of Staff · Thu Jan 27, 2005 6:47 am

I would like to get PM's and e-mails from the SG staff. I feel deprived quite frankly.