Gay Marriage Issue In San Fran.......

Prey521 · Post by **Prey521** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:15 pm

Was watching the news and they're talkin about this whole thing that the Mayor of SF is doing, allowing gays to go to city hall and get a marriage license, even though it is illegal in the state of California, and is therefore a null and void contract. My question is, why would the gay people even bother going to city hall and get the license of it is invalid in the first place? They're wasting their times IMO.

axtrader · Post by **axtrader** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:19 pm

So, where should we go sweetie?

Prey521 · Post by **Prey521** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:24 pm

Originally posted by axtrader
So, where should we go sweetie?

No spank you, I don't take it in the can!

axtrader · Post by **axtrader** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:27 pm

Originally posted by Prey521
No spank you, I don't take it in the can!

Speaking of spankings, is this you Prey?

Prey521 · Post by **Prey521** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:28 pm

Originally posted by axtrader
Speaking of spankings, is this you Prey?

[img][url]http://[/url]%20http://www.rcl.ch/News/News%20Reports%2 ... anking.jpg[/img]

AceFireball · Post by **AceFireball** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:32 pm

Mabey you two could make use of my icon
<

Meggie · Post by **Meggie** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:33 pm

its legal in massachusetts now isnt it?

Joint Chiefs of Staff · Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:39 pm

Originally posted by AceFireball
Mabey you two could make use of my icon
<

What is it?

AceFireball · Post by **AceFireball** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:42 pm

Originally posted by Joint Chiefs of Staff
What is it?

Guess....

Joint Chiefs of Staff · Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:43 pm

Originally posted by AceFireball
Guess....

no

+2

Prey521 · Post by **Prey521** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:47 pm

Originally posted by Meggie
its legal in massachusetts now isnt it?

Spicer · Post by **Spicer** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:48 pm

Originally posted by Prey521
My question is, why would the gay people even bother going to city hall and get the license of it is invalid in the first place? They're wasting their times IMO.

Making a statement....Getting Exposure....

"We don't care about your rules"...

Possible Reasoning.....

Spice

Spicer · Post by **Spicer** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:49 pm

Originally posted by Meggie
its legal in massachusetts now isnt it?

Feb 6/2004

Underscoring its original ruling last November, Massachusetts' highest court said Wednesday that only full marriage rights for gay couples, not civil unions, would conform to the state's constitution.

The ruling sets the stage for Massachusetts later this year to likely become the first state in the nation to allow same-sex marriages.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/02/04/gay.marriage/

Not Yet....They're trying awful hard though to get the legal aspect recognized........

Spice

ScottE · Post by **ScottE** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:52 pm

They've got some kind of Gay Registry or something over in East Cleveland I think.

Prey521 · Post by **Prey521** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:52 pm

Originally posted by ScottE
They've got some kind of Gay Registry or something over in East Cleveland I think.

Damnit, I don't want gay's in my registry, will RegClean get it out?

Zilog B · Post by **Zilog B** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:53 pm

Originally posted by Spicer
Making a statement....Getting Exposure....

"We don't care about your rules"...

Possible Reasoning..... Spice

Sorta reminds me of some lady that refused to set at the back of a bus because of the color of her skin....

hmmmmmm...

Blisster · Post by **Blisster** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:54 pm

The fact that they have a marriage licence and certificate, be it recognized by other cities couts or not, is a starting point in. It sets a precedent, and gives ground to those who chose to fight for thier right to get married, regardless of thier sexual orientation.
I just drove past city hall about an hour and a half ago, and there was a line around the block, about 500 or 600 people llined up waiting to get married (on Sunday no less).
Just because certain groups don't think it is "right" others should not be denied the right to publicly profess thier love and recieve the legal benefits that others do just because of thier sexual orientation, IMHO.

Its been quite a big thing here this week, and literally thousands of couples have come in and been married over the last 4 days.

Blisster · Post by **Blisster** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:54 pm

Originally posted by schlurpee
Sorta reminds me of some lady that refused to set at the back of a bus because of the color of her skin....

hmmmmmm...

Paft · Post by **Paft** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:57 pm

Originally posted by schlurpee
Sorta reminds me of some lady that refused to set at the back of a bus because of the color of her skin....

hmmmmmm...

Spicer · Post by **Spicer** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:57 pm

Originally posted by schlurpee
Sorta reminds me of some lady that refused to set at the back of a bus because of the color of her skin....

hmmmmmm...

Ya.....Based on the same principle I guess

Spice

Spicer · Post by **Spicer** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 9:12 pm

Get this straightened out...The sooner they'll stop runnin up here to Canada to Tie Their Knots....LOL!!

Spice

Cypher · Post by **Cypher** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 9:29 pm

Originally posted by Prey521
No spank you, I don't take it in the can!

Hope this ain't crossing the line here.

golfnintendoboy · Post by **golfnintendoboy** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 9:31 pm

Originally posted by Prey521
Damnit, I don't want gay's in my registry, will RegClean get it out?

lol probably not, they tend to be pretty persistent

ScottE · Post by **ScottE** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 9:31 pm

Butt Sex is wrong.

Cypher · Post by **Cypher** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 9:41 pm

QUOTE]Originally posted by John
wtf

a yellow man fondling a huge monkey penis? [/QUOTE]
Need I say more.

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 9:56 pm

Originally posted by Prey521
No spank you, I don't take it in the can!

Always thought Ax and you would make such a cute couple too.

RoundEye · Post by **RoundEye** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 10:29 pm

No matter what a person's race, religion or sexual orientation is, I think they should be able to enter into a life-time bond that confirms thier love for each other. It's not my place to impose my beliefs on another person, so long as what they do does not try to harm me or family, or take away some property of mine, more power to them. This whole issue of not letting people who love each other, confirm thier love is BS.

I've said this before and this guy thinks the same way I do.

The "gift" of marriage is FROM God, and God only. Therefore, we do NOT need the state's permission to marry. A "License" gives you the right to do something, that without it, you would be doing something illegal. Since when was marriage, a God-ordained institution, illegal? You have a "right" to get married, without a license (the state's permission).

And nobody seems to know why we had to get a marriage license in the first place, (I've tried to tell y'all this before)

Marriage licenses for all citizens is fairly new. It began in the 1800's, when citizens which wanted an interracial marriage had to petition to the government for permission. You see, back then blacks were not considered human! The Supreme Court ruled in 1860 that blacks were NOT human. They were viewed as animals (can you believe that!) However, marriages between two white people, or two black people, or two Chinese, did NOT need licenses. They still don't, but the government is happy to allow you (in your ignorance) to keep paying them revenue.

Also by law, you DO NOT have to get a marriage license, you can get married without a license, and if the state tries to force you to get one, you can sue the crap out of them. I know somebody who did this, and that's why I know this little bit of info about Marriage licenses.

Paft · Post by **Paft** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 11:00 pm

Originally posted by ScottE
Butt Sex is wrong.

Hetero sex is wrong.

.

ScottE · Post by **ScottE** » Sun Feb 15, 2004 11:02 pm

Originally posted by Paft
Hetero sex is wrong. .

I was talking about butt sex in general be it between man and woman, man and man, or god forbid man and beast, but whatever.

Paft · Post by **Paft** » Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:13 am

Originally posted by ScottE
I was talking about butt sex in general be it between man and woman, man and man, or god forbid man and beast, but whatever.

It was sarcasm to make a point.

Don't take offense.

nepenthe · Post by **nepenthe** » Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:21 am

Originally posted by ScottE
Butt Sex is wrong.

Still, you did get an "A" in English. (j/k)

Brent · Post by **Brent** » Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:10 pm

mr. peepee goes into mrs. vagina = a baby

thats the only way it works

mr. peepee into mr. buttox does not = a baby

Zilog B · Post by **Zilog B** » Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:12 pm

Originally posted by Brent
mr. peepee goes into mrs. vagina = a baby

thats the only way it works

mr. peepee into mr. buttox does not = a baby

LOL

Prey521 · Post by **Prey521** » Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:48 pm

Originally posted by Brent
mr. peepee goes into mrs. vagina = a baby

thats the only way it works

mr. peepee into mr. buttox does not = a baby

WhoNut · Post by **WhoNut** » Mon Feb 16, 2004 1:26 pm

Originally posted by Brent
mr. peepee goes into mrs. vagina = a baby

thats the only way it works

mr. peepee into mr. buttox does not = a baby

Does this lesson have a second verse regarding oral sex?

I sure as hell hope my wife doesn't find out that it's wrong too...

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Mon Feb 16, 2004 1:30 pm

Originally posted by WhoNut
Does this lesson have a second verse regarding oral sex?

I sure as hell hope my wife doesn't find out that it's wrong too...

Or how about all the single members.......who keep a bottle of lotion "handy"......Is that not against the biblical laws of man also?

Brent · Post by **Brent** » Mon Feb 16, 2004 1:35 pm

Originally posted by downhill
Or how about all the single members.......who keep a bottle of lotion "handy"......Is that not against the biblical laws of man also?

ah but see, I didn't mention the bible in this thread

i simply said man and women can create a baby, a man and a man cannot, or a women and a women cannot

our civilization, our world, is populated by the sexual intercourse of a man and a women

even if you don't believe in the bible, one can see how nature designed this process to happen so that humans will live on for as long as we are makin babys

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Mon Feb 16, 2004 1:39 pm

Brent, agreed!

In saying that...I don't the population is on the decline. It looks to me, that most people have this figured out just fine.

My first post was not a judgement but only an observation to add to WhoNuts.

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Mon Feb 16, 2004 1:43 pm

Originally posted by Prey521
Damnit, I don't want gay's in my registry, will RegClean get it out?

I think you'll need to do a low level format!

MadDoctor · Post by **MadDoctor** » Mon Feb 16, 2004 1:47 pm

mr. peepee goes into mrs. vagina = wonderful feeling
mr. peepee goes into other things = wonderful feeling

It's not always about having a baby.

SG Broadband Community

Gay Marriage Issue In San Fran.......

Gay Marriage Issue In San Fran.......

Re: Gay Marriage Issue In San Fran.......

Re: Re: Gay Marriage Issue In San Fran.......

Re: Re: Re: Gay Marriage Issue In San Fran.......

Re: Re: Re: Gay Marriage Issue In San Fran.......

Re: Re: Re: Gay Marriage Issue In San Fran.......

The Sooner Ya'll....