Question about NOD32

General Network security, firewalls, port filtering/forwarding, wireless security, anti-spyware, as well as spam control and privacy discussions.
Post Reply
CableDude
SG VIP
Posts: 26801
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2001 12:00 pm

Question about NOD32

Post by CableDude »

Everytime it updates, does it always come up with a "ok" box after the update is installed?

:)
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

Did you flip on the silent mode?
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
User avatar
hayc59
Posts: 2355
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: LSD melts in your mind, not in your hand.

Post by hayc59 »

CableDude, yes and like stoned Cat says it probably
silent mode :thumb:
ãrê ¥Øu êxpêriêncêD
mmione
Posts: 1814
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 4:21 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by mmione »

As good as people think NOD32 is.. it's not :) There is a file on a site with 610 viruses/trojans. NOD32 finds 586 with deep heuristics on and scan all extensions on. Kaspersky finds 603, and extendia AVK finds 610. I would find the link but I'm banned from the forum it's posted on :)
.
CableDude
SG VIP
Posts: 26801
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2001 12:00 pm

Post by CableDude »

YeOldeStonecat wrote:Did you flip on the silent mode?

Pretty sure I did not. I'll have to check on Monday. I did set it to schedule an update at noon today but forgot to watch it. :irate:
CableDude wrote:Everytime it updates, does it always come up with a "ok" box after the update is installed?

:)
BTW, this occured after the first install. It immediately updated on it's own.
CableDude
SG VIP
Posts: 26801
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2001 12:00 pm

Post by CableDude »

mmione wrote:As good as people think NOD32 is.. it's not :) There is a file on a site with 610 viruses/trojans. NOD32 finds 586 with deep heuristics on and scan all extensions on. Kaspersky finds 603, and extendia AVK finds 610. I would find the link but I'm banned from the forum it's posted on :)

No AV is perfect. ;)
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

mmione wrote:As good as people think NOD32 is.. it's not :) There is a file on a site with 610 viruses/trojans. NOD32 finds 586 with deep heuristics on and scan all extensions on. Kaspersky finds 603, and extendia AVK finds 610. I would find the link but I'm banned from the forum it's posted on :)
I'm lovin it...started using it on quite a few smaller clients.

All virus review sites are different...I do like Virusbulletin..., and NOD32 has the highest and longest running score of all over there.

Also including trojans in the test...that leave an awefully lot wide open to interpretation...as one AV company may call a lot of spyware trojans where another simply considers them mild spyware or adware, and ignores them...leaving them to the petty ad/spyware removal programs. There are trojans..and there are honest to goodness real trojans.

I also find NOD very mild on the system performance hit. I'm reading Extendia...the full dual engine one...brings systems down to their knees since it's running 2x scan engines.
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
User avatar
hayc59
Posts: 2355
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: LSD melts in your mind, not in your hand.

Post by hayc59 »

NOD32 is da BOMB!!
DA Best :thumb: :thumb:
ãrê ¥Øu êxpêriêncêD
mmione
Posts: 1814
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 4:21 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by mmione »

hayc59 wrote:NOD32 is da BOMB!!
DA Best :thumb: :thumb:
Nope. :)
.
User avatar
hayc59
Posts: 2355
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: LSD melts in your mind, not in your hand.

Post by hayc59 »

mmione wrote:Nope. :)
Yep :D :nod:
ãrê ¥Øu êxpêriêncêD
User avatar
Cypher
Posts: 2717
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2002 12:00 pm
Location: Returning video tapes

Post by Cypher »

I like Nod32 the best out of the other AV programs I've come across. It's the only one I'd put on my main system as of now. :D
But to each their own as they say . ;)
mmione
Posts: 1814
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 4:21 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by mmione »

Once I get that file you will not say that :) :nope:
.
CableDude
SG VIP
Posts: 26801
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2001 12:00 pm

Post by CableDude »

This thread wasn't to debate if NOD 32 is good or not.
User avatar
hayc59
Posts: 2355
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: LSD melts in your mind, not in your hand.

Post by hayc59 »

mmione, I love you dude!! :thumb: :thumb:
I also Have respect for your AV proggie
ãrê ¥Øu êxpêriêncêD
mmione
Posts: 1814
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 4:21 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by mmione »

Sorry Hayc, didn't mean to offend you. I love the avatar btw.
.
User avatar
hayc59
Posts: 2355
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: LSD melts in your mind, not in your hand.

Post by hayc59 »

mmione wrote:Sorry Hayc, didn't mean to offend you. I love the avatar btw.
you did not offend me at all!! and thanks
ãrê ¥Øu êxpêriêncêD
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

mmione wrote:There is a file on a site with 610 viruses/trojans. NOD32 finds 586 with deep heuristics on and scan all extensions on. Kaspersky finds 603, and extendia AVK finds 610. I would find the link but I'm banned from the forum it's posted on :)
That doesn't make sense though.."a file"....meaning a single file? I don't see how that can be possible, unless it's someones infected hard drive zipped up into a single compressed file or something.

What is this site that you got banned from? What did you do to get banned?
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

CableDude wrote: BTW, this occured after the first install. It immediately updated on it's own.
Yeah it's default setting it to check hourly I believe. No manual intervention required to have to manually keep up on the updates or check to see if updates are out. By the time they are, it's already downloaded them.

Did you turn off the notification?
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
mmione
Posts: 1814
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 4:21 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by mmione »

OK WARNING, THERE IS 610 VIRUSES IN THIS ZIP FILE, IGNORE THE TITLE.

http://fette-toolz.blackworld4u.de/virus/455VIREN.zip

DO NOT DOWNLOAD UNLESS YOU HAVE A UPDATED ANTI VIRUS SCANNER ON.

OK, Kaspersky 5.0 found 605 viruses in the zip file. extendia AVK found 610 I heard.

Good luck, just save the file to the hardrive, it doesnt auto extract, so just right click it our whatever and scan away :) I'm a little confused cause it says scanned files, 594, and viruses detected, 605. Heres a screen:

Image

Post screens :)
.
User avatar
hayc59
Posts: 2355
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: LSD melts in your mind, not in your hand.

Post by hayc59 »

oh my!!! Got balls!!??
lets do it..... :thumb:
ãrê ¥Øu êxpêriêncêD
User avatar
wareagle
Regular Member
Posts: 115
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 9:39 pm
Location: nc

Post by wareagle »

-----------------------------------------------------------------
//
// BitDefender report file
//
// Created on: 11/07/2004 22:10:31
//
//-----------------------------------------------------------------


Statistics

Scan path : D:\Downloads\455VIREN.zip
Folders : 0
Files : 605
Archives : 1
Packed files : 8
Identified viruses : 419
Infected files : 588
Warnings : 0
Suspect files : 0
Disinfected files : 0
Deleted files : 0
Copied files : 0
Moved files : 0
Renamed files : 0
I/O errors : 0
Scan time : 00:00:03
Scan speed (files/sec) : 201

Virus definitions : 86527
Scan plugins : 12
Archive plugins : 36
Unpack plugins : 3
Mail plugins : 6
System plugins :


Also ran AVK Scan but report shows one file scanned and one file infected. It list all the infected files but it ts almost impossible to count them.

Mmione you have one of the best if not the best AV Scanner on the market.
CableDude
SG VIP
Posts: 26801
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2001 12:00 pm

Post by CableDude »

YeOldeStonecat wrote:Did you flip on the silent mode?
Ye,

Slient mode is not checked. I was unable to watch it update today (it did update) . I think it (the dialog box) was just because of a manual update.

TY. :thumb:
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

Does someone with AVG want to take on scanning this file?

Allowing for a count variance of "1" because it will depend on how people scan a zipped file, some may count the zip file itself as 1x infection, but rather scan the contents....

At work, we scanned with file with

Symantec Corp Edition 8.0, 594 scanned, 587 infected
Symantec Corp Edition 8.1, same
Panda 594 scanned 588 infected
Sophos 594 scanned 587 infected
RAV didn’t find anything infected
F-Secure 594 scanned 587 infected
PC-Cillin 593 scanned 587 infected
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
User avatar
mnosteele52
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Chesapeake, VA

Post by mnosteele52 »

YeOldeStonecat wrote:Does someone with AVG want to take on scanning this file?
Here you go YOSC, AVG 7.0 Pro

601 files
559 infected

I'm wondering who is correct in the number of files it contains.

:)
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

mnosteele52 wrote:Here you go YOSC, AVG 7.0 Pro

601 files
559 infected

I'm wondering who is correct in the number of files it contains.

:)
Same here....open up the zipped file in Windows Explorer, or Winzip, or Enzip, or whatever you wish to unzip with, even when set to show all files, I only see 593 files inside of that zipped file.

I could see where some files perhaps might be infected with several diff viruses....that may account for some variance in the total infection count.
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
User avatar
mnosteele52
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Chesapeake, VA

Post by mnosteele52 »

Old thread but I was curious.

Kaspersky Personal Pro 4.5 fully updated with the extended database.

Files - 594
Known Viruses - 415
Virus Bodies - 587

:)
User avatar
Epyon
Regular Member
Posts: 345
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2001 4:42 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post by Epyon »

NaV 2002 - Latest Definition
Image
EP45-UD3R | E8500 | ZALMAN 9700 NT | 8800GT OC | G.SKILL 8GB DDR2 1066 | Antec 900 | Barracuda 1TB | Win7 Ult x64
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

mnosteele52 wrote:Old thread but I was curious.

Kaspersky Personal Pro 4.5 fully updated with the extended database.

Files - 594
Known Viruses - 415
Virus Bodies - 587

:)
Hmm......me thinks there's something a bit odd about this zipped file, and the contents, and how the files are infected. (possibly a file with one or more buggers in it). Just some odd counts that we get with this one.

We should find some more "samples" of bug collections, to run tests on. Just for curiosity sake.
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
User avatar
mnosteele52
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Chesapeake, VA

Post by mnosteele52 »

YeOldeStonecat wrote:Hmm......me thinks there's something a bit odd about this zipped file, and the contents, and how the files are infected. (possibly a file with one or more buggers in it). Just some odd counts that we get with this one.

We should find some more "samples" of bug collections, to run tests on. Just for curiosity sake.
I completely agree YOSC, I have been using Kaspersky for about a week and a half now and all I can say is that NOTHING compares to it. It is more in depth and thorough than any other AV app I've seen, especially with the extended database. The extended database scans for malicious malware as well, as we said before - not spyware but malware. There are updates hourly for it and they guarantee to have a definition out within 3 hours of any newly discovered virus. Currently it scans for 102792 different viruses/malware, that's WAY more than anyone else.

Almost any review or test you read about Kaspersky gives it a 98% or higher effective rating, I haven't seen a singe negative review or comment about it anywhere.

You should really give it a try YOSC, I guarantee you will love it.

:thumb: :2cool:
User avatar
mnosteele52
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Chesapeake, VA

Post by mnosteele52 »

mnosteele52 wrote:I completely agree YOSC, I have been using Kaspersky for about a week and a half now and all I can say is that NOTHING compares to it. It is more in depth and thorough than any other AV app I've seen, especially with the extended database. The extended database scans for malicious malware as well, as we said before - not spyware but malware. There are updates hourly for it and they guarantee to have a definition out within 3 hours of any newly discovered virus. Currently it scans for 102792 different viruses/malware, that's WAY more than anyone else.

Almost any review or test you read about Kaspersky gives it a 98% or higher effective rating, I haven't seen a singe negative review or comment about it anywhere.

You should really give it a try YOSC, I guarantee you will love it.

:thumb: :2cool:
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

I don't know where to find resources for more "collections of bugs" that we can all get our hands on and hit with the various AV apps the lot of us comprise...but it would be a fun little project here. I'll see what I can dig up, anyone else here wanna make a game of this?

Basically get a collection of viruses such as the one in this thread...just a bunch of other various ones. Also fiddle with sending e-mails with viruses. Setup "test machines" that we don't care if they get infected, receive the e-mails, etc.
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

mnosteele52 wrote: You should really give it a try YOSC, I guarantee you will love it.

:thumb: :2cool:
I've run across is on a couple of stand alone machines I've fiddled with...

Agreed it has a fantastic detection rate, a bit pokey in scan times though. NOD32 is still hands down my fave for stand alone machines. Tiny footprint, little CPU performance impact, and scan times faster than a raped ape. And the little bit I've seen of their networked version, with the management console, it looks sweet. We're about ready to replace an old McAfee networked version at a jet engine repair facility soon with NOD32 networked version. Will be my first hands on with a large network using it, I've only had a chance to fiddle with their mirror server at home on 4 PCs. But from the bit that I've seen...it looks like it potentially is even better than Symantecs CE management console.

Microsoft just renewed their site license with NOD32 a month ago!
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
mmione
Posts: 1814
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 4:21 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by mmione »

I told you it was good :) Hold on there is a link to another one somewhere.
.
User avatar
chpalmer
Advanced Member
Posts: 558
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2002 3:52 pm
Location: Kitsap co Wa

Post by chpalmer »

Trend Housecall showed 7 scanned items with 587 infected files.
Never take any crap off an inanimate object!!

Never send email to this address: spam@euclidian.com. This is a spam trap and everyone sending any email to this address will be blacklisted.
Post Reply