that's horrible as others have said. we have 3 cats, and a family of stray cats living under our house. the mom cat has 5 kittens, we feed them everyday and let them inside and stuff.
I dont know how you could take a cat or something small and defenseless like that and barbecue it...
I wish i was teh person who found those total peices of grabtastic **** i would of stuck the dude's face on the dang grill
Originally posted by Bouncer The interesting thing about taking a deliberately contrary position is that really, it attempts to force others to pay attention to you.
Just so, the way to deal with such trolling is to simply reply that "that's nice!" or "that's so cute!" something which ignores and dismisses the troll.
The troll will then of course try to spin up the argument claiming that you have no argument etc. Again, this tries to move the attention back to the troll and force everyone else to pay attention to their antics.
Like a mouse in a maze they will try and push the same button to get the peanut. In this case attention is the peanut.
So, take away the peanut. Let them know that only thoughtful posts from them will merit a response. This will get them to post more thoughtfully because in the end, they don't care about the argument itself.
They want the peanut.
They want your attention.
It is up to you to decide whether you will give them what they want on their terms. Or yours.
Originally posted by Jin Stop with the arguments already!!! If jz is here just to instigate then let him who cares what he says just ignore him. If you guys keep responding to his posts then he'll keep responding back and make you even more piss off. So just drop it.
Ignorance is a very hard concept to develop against people, but when it comes to facts everyone seems to have learned it.
Yeah that guy has psychological problems. Imo I would have sentenced him to 50 whip lashes. But a fine and jail time has never fixed mental problems.
Ah, but how many kills are clean kills? What if someone doesn't hit a deer in the head or heart? What if they're hit in the stomach, run off and die over the next hour in incredible pain?
I can understand why people would want to defend something they take great pride in, though. After all, killing a deer with a gun is quite the accomplishment.
"...yeah, usually when i go deer hunting i lure the deer into trusting my by feeding it 'Deer Treats' and playing with it a little, then i stuff it in a barbeque and laugh and drink beer while poking at it with a stick and making jokes with my friends while it burns to death. Then I ususally just leave it there and go to MacDonalds. After about 20 Big Mac's I go and see whayt kind of mischief I can stir up on web-boards by posting obviously contradictory and obtuse replies in general discusion forums.
can you guess my name?..."
Edward Abbey wrote:A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.
Originally posted by jz Ah, but how many kills are clean kills? What if someone doesn't hit a deer in the head or heart? What if they're hit in the stomach, run off and die over the next hour in incredible pain?
I can understand why people would want to defend something they take great pride in, though. After all, killing a deer with a gun is quite the accomplishment.
Define clean kill and then define dirty kill.
Head and heart shots are NOT the primary target on most big game animals.
I'm a bowhunter and conservationist.
David, I'm sorry to differ with you on this point, but food crops kill wildlife.
Originally posted by UOD
David, I'm sorry to differ with you on this point, but food crops kill wildlife.
Don't apologize, we can both feel guilty eating bread and broccoli , but you are opening a previously closed can of worms. (Note, I did not attacking hunting)