CD Burning software
CD Burning software
OMG, Roxio Easy CD 5 sucks almost as bad as Adaptec EZ v4.
What are you all using to burn CDRs? I mostly use Nero and CDRWin, but whats good for directly burning .MP3 files to an audio disc (decoding to WAV and burning on the fly?)
What are you all using to burn CDRs? I mostly use Nero and CDRWin, but whats good for directly burning .MP3 files to an audio disc (decoding to WAV and burning on the fly?)
Intel P4 2.8 800FSB / Asus P4P800SE / Corsair 1024MB PC3200 / Antec Sonata / TruePower 380w
Asus GeForce4 Ti4200 / Seagate 200GB SATA / WD 200GB IDE / LiteOn 4x DVD-RW / Windows XP Pro SP2
Asus GeForce4 Ti4200 / Seagate 200GB SATA / WD 200GB IDE / LiteOn 4x DVD-RW / Windows XP Pro SP2
- Joint Chiefs of Staff
- Posts: 42832
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: The Sandbox
Actually I've had no problems using Roxio v5.2 since the updates where released. Have you tried making sure your updates are 100%? I use cdrwin 4.0 and sometimes FireBurner for the good ol' bin/cues. I haven't had the opprotunity to explore and use Nero. People do swear by it though.
I use VOB CD & DVD for burning and overburning avi's. A lovely burning program.
I use VOB CD & DVD for burning and overburning avi's. A lovely burning program.
>>Cult Master of International Affairs<<
If your looking for accuracy, there isn't any software that can burn on the fly and have a perfect reproduction. All of them have slight errors. You might not be able to hear them but they are still there.
For mp3 to cd's, I use Winamp to convert to wav then burn them.
The latest version of Winamp's codec is as accurate as it gets. There are others that are just as accurate but not in burning programs.
For mp3 to cd's, I use Winamp to convert to wav then burn them.
The latest version of Winamp's codec is as accurate as it gets. There are others that are just as accurate but not in burning programs.
- RoundEye
- Posts: 18219
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2000 12:00 am
- Location: In a dry but moldy New Orleans, Louisiana
I with you on that I like NTI CD Maker Pro the most too.Originally posted by glc1
I hate Nero (too many undocumented options, cumbersome interface) and Easy CD Creator 5.
I like NTI CD-Maker 2000 Pro.
I might try Nero Express.
Sliding down the banister of life ..........................
Observe everything...focus on nothing..
I have been using NTI here lately, bought it at CompUSA on sale for 20 bucks. Anyways, it works sweet, just as easy as Roxio/Easy CD but without all the bugs and such. I did have to update it though, but NTI had a free update and flawless install of the update, no complaints here.
I also have Nero, but have noticed problems when burning audio cd's, so I no longer use it for my audio stuff.
I also have Nero, but have noticed problems when burning audio cd's, so I no longer use it for my audio stuff.
- Gaming-Module
- Posts: 7987
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Michigan
CORNBREAD!Originally posted by Cornbread
I have been using NTI here lately, bought it at CompUSA on sale for 20 bucks. Anyways, it works sweet, just as easy as Roxio/Easy CD but without all the bugs and such. I did have to update it though, but NTI had a free update and flawless install of the update, no complaints here.
I also have Nero, but have noticed problems when burning audio cd's, so I no longer use it for my audio stuff.
That's not really a glitch. A lot of problems require admin privileges to function.Originally posted by twwabw
![]()
GREAT program, isn't it? I like it a lot. Only glitch, in Win2K / XP, user must be member of admin group for it to run. This is a pain in the a*s in a domain environment. I try to lock the machines down tight, but I have to allow users to be local admins on the workstation it's installed on. NTI support says it's a "slight problem", and they're "looking into it".
![]()
I've never needed anything but CloneCD to copy certain discs.Originally posted by C.M. Weaver
In my opinion for anyone who does a lot of burning of all kinds of CD's or images you should have these in your library:
- CloneCD
- Nero
- Padus DiscJuggler
- FireBurner
Also, get WinISO to help construct you own ISO images or add/delete from existing images.
Gotta disagree with you there. It's a REAL problem, and the reason it doesn't function is it is not ASPI compliant. And since it's not, it needs access to dynamic registry changes with 2K / XP, which are only possible with admin priveledges. I don't know of too many desktop applications that require this kind of access.Originally posted by glc1
That's not really a glitch. A lot of problems require admin privileges to function.
It defeats trying to set up a reasonable security policy on user's PC's, and that's my real issue with it. The thought of a typical user needing admin rights to burn a CD seems a little ridiculous.
The only other mainstream app I've run into that has issues like this is AutoCAD. It requires all users to be at minimum, members of the power users group, for the same reason (registry). It too is a huge pain in the a*s, but there's a registry edit you can do to allow them full control over app, but nothin else.
Observe everything...focus on nothing..
Originally posted by twwabw
I think I'm missing your point.... why shouldn't a user have a CD burner?
Too much chance for misuse that the company would be responsible for.
We have a few users with Burners due to document storage required by the EPA. But as a general rule we wouldn't want users to have them. The chances are just too great that they would be misused. It's a liability issue that is a huge question mark. sorry, sounds Nazi but you can't take chances all the time.
You're right- I was reading between the lines I guess. My wrong. But, the point I'm trying to make is this: I have users that need to make CD's all the time. They are not admins, nor should they be local admins. I control their desktop for a reason. And having a software app require admin rights (local) is ridiculous.Originally posted by glc1
When did I say that? Re-read post.
The thought that it should be this way for corporate liability or intellectual property protection is not relevant to my point- this is like saying a user should have to have admin rights to use a floppy drive. Preventing users from copying data is a completely different animal.
If this was ever their intention, then they would have made the same requirements for their app in NT for instance. But, NT does not require this as registry access is not limited.
Hence my statement that it is a "glitch".
Observe everything...focus on nothing..
Agreed. You should NOT have to do something as lame as add a user account to the Administrators group on an NT system simply so they can run some software.
I don't know how many times I've had to scrap a security policy because of some stupid problem like that. If I want to control the ability of uses to run software then I'll design a policy to do so, I don't like to be limited in what I can configure.
The 'ol "stick 'em in the Admins group" fix is a major PITA...
I don't know how many times I've had to scrap a security policy because of some stupid problem like that. If I want to control the ability of uses to run software then I'll design a policy to do so, I don't like to be limited in what I can configure.
The 'ol "stick 'em in the Admins group" fix is a major PITA...
Intel P4 2.8 800FSB / Asus P4P800SE / Corsair 1024MB PC3200 / Antec Sonata / TruePower 380w
Asus GeForce4 Ti4200 / Seagate 200GB SATA / WD 200GB IDE / LiteOn 4x DVD-RW / Windows XP Pro SP2
Asus GeForce4 Ti4200 / Seagate 200GB SATA / WD 200GB IDE / LiteOn 4x DVD-RW / Windows XP Pro SP2