I'm living in Vineland, NJ (South Jersey) and am a new Comcast HSI subscriber. My download speeds aren't so hot, even though I have tweaked my registry settings (running Windows 98 SE, 500 Mhz, 192 M of RAM).
Below is a summary of my registry settings:
From the DSL Reports Tweak Report:
http://monitor.dslreports.com/tweak/blo ... via=normal
From Speedtest.net Tweak Test:
TCP options string = 020405b401010402
MTU = 1500
MTU is fully optimized for broadband.
MSS = 1460
Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which is equal to MSS.
Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 17520
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits
Unscaled Receive Window = 17520
RWIN is a multiple of MSS
Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)
256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
64240 (MSS x 44)
bandwidth * delay product:
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 700.8 kbps (87.6 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 280.32 kbps (35.04 KBytes/s) @ 500ms
Consider increasing your RWIN value to optimize TCP/IP for broadband.
MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON
Time to live left = 113 hops
TTL value is ok.
Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF
Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON
IP type of service field (RFC1349)= 00000000
My download/upload speeds have been reported as follows:
From Speedtest.net:
Test Number: 1
Test Type: Download 1 Megabyte
Bytes Downloaded: 1048576 bytes
Download time: 9390 milliseconds.
Throughput: 0.852 Mbps
Test Number: 2
Test Type: Upload 500 Kilobytes
Bytes Uploaded: 512000 bytes
Upload time: 33230 milliseconds.
Throughput: 0.118 Mbps
From DSL Reports (using Linkline server):
Test running..........
** Speed 768(down)/234(up) kbps **
(At least 15 times faster than a 56k modem)
Finish.
Any ideas from the gurus on how to tweak my settings further for better download? My upload seems to be OK, but my download is nowhere near the cap of 1500.
Suggestions would be greatly appreciated, or am I just suffering from a slow network?
- Wayne
Comcast Slow Downloads - Any Ideas?
Try downloading the SG Optimizer located here http://speedguide.net/files/TCPOptimizer.exe. Run it and select Cable Modem at the top then Optimal settings at the bottom. Apply changes and reboot then do a speed test.
"A never ending quest for knowledge as with knowledge comes wisdom"
Main System running Windows XP Pro: Intel Celeron 2.4 Ghz, 1 Gig Ram, 2 80 gig WD 7200 rpm HD's, Radeon 9200 Pro, Envision EN9110 19" LCD Display, HP 9500 CD-RW, D-Link DFE-530TX+ PCI Adapter, D-Link DI-704P Router, Motorola SB5100 Cable Modem with Cox HSI
Main System running Windows XP Pro: Intel Celeron 2.4 Ghz, 1 Gig Ram, 2 80 gig WD 7200 rpm HD's, Radeon 9200 Pro, Envision EN9110 19" LCD Display, HP 9500 CD-RW, D-Link DFE-530TX+ PCI Adapter, D-Link DI-704P Router, Motorola SB5100 Cable Modem with Cox HSI
OK *blush* - now I feel stupid. I had run the TCPOptimizer before doing my previous tests... I guess I was using servers too far from my area. Using the phl.speakeasy.net server, this is my results:
Test running..........
** Speed 1086(down)/123(up) kbps **
(At least 21 times faster than a 56k modem)
Finish.
Guess I don't really have anything to complain about... I was using servers too far away from me...
- Wayne
Test running..........
** Speed 1086(down)/123(up) kbps **
(At least 21 times faster than a 56k modem)
Finish.
Guess I don't really have anything to complain about... I was using servers too far away from me...
- Wayne
try this one as well. http://www.nyc.speakeasy.net and http://www.bos.speakeasy.net
-
:SpeedDemon:
if Comcast transitioned you over to their new internet access service (From @home) then those are pretty much the speeds you'll get.
Comcast has just shafted it's customers by setting major capping with this new service. I'm currently now at 400/127 down/up, far far far off from where I was just weeks ago. Sure, I might be a bitch for complaining about speeds that I'm sure many people dream of, but I'm still paying the same money for now far slower service.
So much for the "new and improved" service they promised.
Comcast has just shafted it's customers by setting major capping with this new service. I'm currently now at 400/127 down/up, far far far off from where I was just weeks ago. Sure, I might be a bitch for complaining about speeds that I'm sure many people dream of, but I'm still paying the same money for now far slower service.
So much for the "new and improved" service they promised.
Refer to this threadOriginally posted by :SpeedDemon:
if Comcast transitioned you over to their new internet access service (From @home) then those are pretty much the speeds you'll get.
Comcast has just shafted it's customers by setting major capping with this new service. I'm currently now at 400/127 down/up, far far far off from where I was just weeks ago. Sure, I might be a bitch for complaining about speeds that I'm sure many people dream of, but I'm still paying the same money for now far slower service.
So much for the "new and improved" service they promised.
https://www.speedguide.net/forums/ ... genumber=2
- Lobo
- SG VIP
- Posts: 17660
- Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2000 2:32 pm
- Location: Panama City, FL and a FAN of Dale Earnhardt Jr. Bud Chevy & NASCAR , and the Atlanta Braves
Try test here, it seems to be the fastest: Right here