Post Your Speed Contest

Lee_Nover · Post by **Lee_Nover** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 8:00 am

http://chi.speakeasy.net/

Take test here. Post your results with your connection type and advertised rates, and if you know it, current RWIN value

Cable Modem 128480 Rwin Value

Advertised rates - 3000 kb/s down 480 kb/s up.

Actual Speed - Speed 2392(down) /472(up) kbps

Winner gets a Turkey Leg.

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 8:02 am

i get a big fat red X and nothing else

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 8:35 am

Heres my results from dling ftp://ftp.newaol.com/aol6.0/103899/setupcs2k60xp.exe

HalfLifer · Post by **HalfLifer** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 8:56 am

** Speed 2602(down)/101(up) kbps **
(At least 52 times faster than a 56k modem)
Finish.

3mbit/128kbit.

CableDude · Post by **CableDude** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 9:30 am

** Speed 3218(down)/123(up) kbps **
(At least 64 times faster than a 56k modem)
Finish.

advertised rates: 3000mbit/128kbit

iaus10 · Post by **iaus10** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 10:46 am

Test running..........
** Speed 1859(down)/369(up) kbps **
(At least 37 times faster than a 56k modem)
Finish

2000/384

92% of my cap (usually at 98%)

NYR 56 · Post by **NYR 56** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 11:01 am

** Speed 8566(down)/807(up) kbps **
(At least 171 times faster than a 56k modem)

Do I win for cable & DSL users? :-)

Screen Shot

earthmofo · Post by **earthmofo** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 11:06 am

** Speed 3102(down)/287(up) kbps **
(At least 62 times faster than a 56k modem)

@home 3000/300 RWIN - 601520

My connection is a little slow today. Usally 3800-3900 kbps

iaus10 · Post by **iaus10** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 11:20 am

Originally posted by NYR 56
** Speed 8566(down)/807(up) kbps **
(At least 171 times faster than a 56k modem)

Do I win for cable & DSL users? :-)

Screen Shot

running away with tail between legs...

How much does that connection set you back?

I just saw the prices for Optimum Online.... same as my RR

NYR 56 · Post by **NYR 56** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 11:26 am

It costs amazingly only $30. Cable service by Optimum Online. Im just lucky its in my area!

earthmofo · Post by **earthmofo** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 11:27 am

I thought so. Wish I had it here

EvilAjax · Post by **EvilAjax** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 11:40 am

** Speed 1515(down)/113(up) kbps **
(At least 30 times faster than a 56k modem)
Finish.

Above my cap. 102% of my rated download speed, and around 90% of my rated upload speed. I'm doing pretty damn good if you ask me.

Yoshee, you bastard!

Cameron203 · Post by **Cameron203** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 12:42 pm

Speedtest
Test running..........
** Speed 1945(down)/370(up) kbps **
(At least 38 times faster than a 56k modem)
Finish.
RR in Central FLorida capped at 2000/384

*i posted in new thread again we need to move them tabs away from each other. lol

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 2:05 pm

Originally posted by NYR 56
** Speed 8566(down)/807(up) kbps **
(At least 171 times faster than a 56k modem)

Do I win for cable & DSL users? :-)

Screen Shot

finsigh the dl and take a picture of the end result pls

NYR 56 · Post by **NYR 56** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 2:35 pm

Your not supposed to wait until the end, since IE includes the time it takes to actually write to disk. The speed will fall slightly, probably around 995KBps, but that isnt accurate. And I think the test from speekeasy proves that the download speed is realistic.

I could always downlaod a file through a command window, and that will be more accurate (faster) but its not anything significant.

TeenInternetAddict · Post by **TeenInternetAddict** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 2:54 pm

** Speed 3150(down)/214(up) kbps **
(At least 63 times faster than a 56k modem)
Finish.

Capped at 3mbit download/256 kbit upload. Too bad it can't be more faster like OOL users

I used to get OOL users' speeds for the last 2 years until it got capped in August 2001. I get between 2500 to 2986 mbps down and 200 to 230+ kbps up. But normally, I do go over the dl caps.

HalfLifer · Post by **HalfLifer** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 2:59 pm

I used to get 5300/1300

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 3:01 pm

Originally posted by NYR 56
Your not supposed to wait until the end, since IE includes the time it takes to actually write to disk. The speed will fall slightly, probably around 995KBps, but that isnt accurate. And I think the test from speekeasy proves that the download speed is realistic.

I could always downlaod a file through a command window, and that will be more accurate (faster) but its not anything significant.

then here is my winner, non cached:

NYR 56 · Post by **NYR 56** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 3:16 pm

Man, your supposed to wait a while, your download just started.
If you wait halfway, it should be accurate (non cached of course). I just redid it, and at halfway, its 1.05MBps. If you get faster halfway, cool.

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 3:24 pm

Originally posted by NYR 56
Man, your supposed to wait a while, your download just started.
If you wait halfway, it should be accurate (non cached of course). I just redid it, and at halfway, its 1.05MBps. If you get faster halfway, cool.

post urs half way

EDIT my ass thought u has @home lol but still post halfway

NYR 56 · Post by **NYR 56** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 4:03 pm

Let me find a friggin server...

Lee_Nover · Post by **Lee_Nover** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 4:12 pm

http://nyc.speakeasy.net/

seems pretty local to you.

HalfLifer · Post by **HalfLifer** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 4:19 pm

ftp://ftp.netscape.com/pub/netscape6/en ... SetupB.exe

Lets see em at 13-15 megs downloaded.

NYR 56 · Post by **NYR 56** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 4:27 pm

I meant a web server that lets me link directly to pics. Well, for now:

Screen Shot 2

Better?

hayc59 · Post by **hayc59** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 5:48 pm

** Speed 3563(down)/100(up) kbps **
(At least 71 times faster than a 56k modem)
Finish.

Gandalff · Post by **Gandalff** » Sat Nov 24, 2001 11:02 pm

Window xp

reeo · Post by **reeo** » Sun Nov 25, 2001 4:03 am

My advertised speed is 3000 down and 290 up

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Sun Nov 25, 2001 7:51 am

Originally posted by NYR 56
I meant a web server that lets me link directly to pics. Well, for now:

Screen Shot 2

Better?

only by .01 lol

blebs · Post by **blebs** » Sun Nov 25, 2001 9:02 am

Cable 256960 RWIN
2000/384 NEO RR
Test running..........
** Speed 1910(down)/337(up) kbps **
(At least 38 times faster than a 56k modem)
Finish.

NYR 56 · Post by **NYR 56** » Sun Nov 25, 2001 11:08 am

Originally posted by Gandalff
Window xp

Gandalff, download a file that is really big, like 50MB, and post the results halfway fo that. Your speed is impossible for all of cable and DSL users. If you have fiber or something well, thats different

FinalRender · Post by **FinalRender** » Sun Nov 25, 2001 11:38 am

Yo NYR what are yoyr rwin settings and are u using cable but?

NYR 56 · Post by **NYR 56** » Sun Nov 25, 2001 12:17 pm

Im using cable provided by Optimum Online, a great ISP. I doubt using my tweaks will help your speed all that much though, since its mainly the ISP. But it cant hurt I suppose.

RWIN: 64240 on WinXP & WinME

CiscoKid · Post by **CiscoKid** » Sun Nov 25, 2001 5:25 pm

Test running..........
** Speed 1194(down)/282(up) kbps **
(At least 23 times faster than a 56k modem)
Finish.

def_ · Post by **def_** » Sun Nov 25, 2001 6:51 pm

**Speed 2756(down) 107 (up) kbs**
(At least 55 times faster than a 56k modem)
Finish

rwin =601520

@home

Compman15 · Post by **Compman15** » Sun Nov 25, 2001 8:31 pm

** Speed 9000(down)/1500(up) kbps **
(At least 80 times faster than a 56k modem)
Finish.

NYR 56 · Post by **NYR 56** » Sun Nov 25, 2001 10:20 pm

Originally posted by Compman15
** Speed 9000(down)/1500(up) kbps **
(At least 80 times faster than a 56k modem)
Finish.

You flamer, what are you retarded? Why did you make those results up???

EvilAjax · Post by **EvilAjax** » Sun Nov 25, 2001 10:22 pm

Originally posted by Compman15
** Speed 9000(down)/1500(up) kbps **
(At least 80 times faster than a 56k modem)
Finish.

Yeah like that would only be 80 times faster.

hansonm · Post by **hansonm** » Sun Nov 25, 2001 11:52 pm

Test running.....
**Speed 292(down)/81(up)**
(At least 5 times better than a 56K modem)
Finish

Why are the number in AnalogX NetStat Live so much lower?

I have done the tweaks.

iaus10 · Post by **iaus10** » Mon Nov 26, 2001 9:17 am

Originally posted by hansonm
Test running.....
**Speed 292(down)/81(up)**
(At least 5 times better than a 56K modem)
Finish

Why are the number in AnalogX NetStat Live so much lower?

I have done the tweaks.

If they're 8 times lower, it's because they are being displayed in KBytes rather than Kbits. 1 Byte = 8 bits

I'd say "GO ViKES"... but not after last nights game

Indy · Post by **Indy** » Mon Nov 26, 2001 11:38 am

** Speed 3299(down)/1109(up) kbps **
(At least 65 times faster than a 56k modem)

Graphed here

SG Broadband Community

Post Your Speed Contest

Post Your Speed Contest

Speedtest

2850 down 290 up