Which is best, 4x1 GB or 2x2 GB?

Anything related to hardware (CPU/MoBo/Video/FSB/BIOS, etc.), hardware settings, overclocking, cooling, cool cases, case mods, hardware mods, post pics of your unique creations here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Lurch
Advanced Member
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 7:50 am
Location: TN

Which is best, 4x1 GB or 2x2 GB?

Post by Lurch »

Does it matter in my Dell Optiplex GX620? I'm running Win 7 now but with only 4 GB of RAM [2x2]. It runs OK, but won't run at all with 8 GB, it won't even start up. I have 64 bit OS, but I have yet to figure that out.
User avatar
RaisinCain
Posts: 1941
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 7:11 pm

Post by RaisinCain »

Just do a Google search for your model, read the info that comes up and quit ignoring what we've already told you.
User avatar
morbidpete
Posts: 7282
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2002 12:00 pm
Location: W. Warwick RI

Post by morbidpete »

As long as they are all matching pairs and we are only talking ddr or ddr2, then it shouldn't matter. I think I read something back int he day about some ram operating with lower CAS when only using 2 sticks but I dont think that applies anymore.

as far as the 8GB limit, Like RaisinCain mentioned. Your Mobo manual will be able to tll you the max limit of your motherboard. Sounds like 4GB
User avatar
Philip
SG VIP
Posts: 11758
Joined: Sat May 08, 1999 5:00 am
Location: Jacksonville, Florida

Post by Philip »

Using more sticks can add a bit of latency to the memory timings, I've seen motherboards where you have to use more conservative timings when you use multiple modules.
User avatar
Lurch
Advanced Member
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 7:50 am
Location: TN

Post by Lurch »

RaisinCain wrote:Just do a Google search for your model, read the info that comes up and quit ignoring what we've already told you.
I'm not ignoring what you told me, and please speak for yourself. If you get irritated with what I say, perhaps you and I aren't compatible, and consider passing it for a poster that appeals to you more.

I've read that 8 GB can be used if it's with a 64 bit OS, which it has. Quit ignoring I said that. Address it, or pass it by to some other post.
User avatar
YARDofSTUF
Posts: 70006
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 12:00 am
Location: USA

Post by YARDofSTUF »

The Dell Optiplex GX620 supports a max of 4 gigs according to the User Guide.

2 sticks would be ideal for dual channel support.
User avatar
Lurch
Advanced Member
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 7:50 am
Location: TN

Post by Lurch »

morbidpete wrote: Your Mobo manual will be able to tll you the max limit of your motherboard. Sounds like 4GB
I've seen that the Dell site says 4 GB max for a GX620 Optiplex, but I've also read that 8 GB can be used if the same PC has a 64 bit OS [which mine has 64 Bit Win 7] OR, a Mobo upgrade [which I do not know if it has]. The guy that sells / services PCs and sold me my PCs, told me 8 GB would work in it..
TTYTT, I'm not too crazy about Win 7 anyway. It's OK but one thing I don't like is that I can't see thumbs of images in photo folders of pics I took. I have to click on the image to open it to full size in order to see what it is. In Win XP, I can easily preview each thumb w/o having to open up the image.
User avatar
Lurch
Advanced Member
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 7:50 am
Location: TN

Post by Lurch »

YARDofSTUF wrote:The Dell Optiplex GX620 supports a max of 4 gigs according to the User Guide.

2 sticks would be ideal for dual channel support.
Thanks YOS and all of you. I guess Win 7 is Ok but I think I prefer Win XP Pro with 4 GB of RAM. It's responsive with the Pentium D dual core. Fastest PC I ever had. It's not perfect but it's no slouch. :) They are easy to work on and very reliable. I like Dell PCs.
User avatar
morbidpete
Posts: 7282
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2002 12:00 pm
Location: W. Warwick RI

Post by morbidpete »

Philip wrote:Using more sticks can add a bit of latency to the memory timings, I've seen motherboards where you have to use more conservative timings when you use multiple modules.
That's what I was thinking of!
Lurch wrote: It's OK but one thing I don't like is that I can't see thumbs of images in photo folders of pics I took. I have to click on the image to open it to full size in order to see what it is. In Win XP, I can easily preview each thumb w/o having to open up the image.
Not true, Right click, view, large icons

Image

Lurch wrote:Thanks YOS and all of you. I guess Win 7 is Ok but I think I prefer Win XP Pro with 4 GB of RAM. It's responsive with the Pentium D dual core. Fastest PC I ever had. It's not perfect but it's no slouch. :) They are easy to work on and very reliable. I like Dell PCs.
as far as the ram, One last thing to check is your CPU, Your mobo maybe be able to do 8GB but the CPU has to support it also
User avatar
RaisinCain
Posts: 1941
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 7:11 pm

Post by RaisinCain »

morbidpete wrote:That's what I was thinking of!



Not true, Right click, view, large icons

Image




as far as the ram, One last thing to check is your CPU, Your mobo maybe be able to do 8GB but the CPU has to support it also
Nope. The memory limit is a function of the chipset as well as the CPU.
User avatar
morbidpete
Posts: 7282
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2002 12:00 pm
Location: W. Warwick RI

Post by morbidpete »

RaisinCain wrote:Nope. The memory limit is a function of the chipset as well as the CPU.
Roger Roger,
User avatar
JasonT99
Member
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 7:53 am

Post by JasonT99 »

There is no big difference though imo. I prefer 2x2 just for simplicity and it is easy for future upgrade.
User avatar
Lurch
Advanced Member
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 7:50 am
Location: TN

Post by Lurch »

I hear you on the RAM sticks but I can't get Win 7 show show thumbnail images. It only shows icons, lists, etc., like this :
Capture dec 3.jpg
I have to lick on them to se what they are unless I recognize the name.

I've been using Win 7 for the last week and I kind of like it, and it's not too sluggish with 4 GB of RAM [2 x 2 GB]. I guess I'll keep my XP Pro PC and this one with Win 7.
User avatar
morbidpete
Posts: 7282
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2002 12:00 pm
Location: W. Warwick RI

Post by morbidpete »

You need to change the picture viewer back to defaults. That send to be your issue, the third party picture viewer
Post Reply