AT&T buys T-mobile

Discuss anything not covered in another forum (life, the universe etc.)... Please keep it PG-13 and avoid spam.
Post Reply
User avatar
morbidpete
Posts: 7283
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2002 12:00 pm
Location: W. Warwick RI

AT&T buys T-mobile

Post by morbidpete »

http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/20/atan ... e-telekom/
Wowzers! AT&T and Deutsche Telekom have entered into a definitive agreement for the sale of T-Mobile USA for $39 billion in cash and stocks. The combined customer base of this upcoming behemoth will be 130 million humans, though the agreed deal will have to pass the usual regulatory and closing hurdles before becoming complete. The two companies estimate it'll take them 12 months to get through all the bureaucracy -- if they get through, the proposed network merger will create a de facto GSM monopoly within the United States -- but we don't have to wait that long to start discussing life with only three major US carriers. AT&T envisions it as a rosy garden of "straightforward synergies" thanks to a set of "complementary network technologies, spectrum positions and operations."
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

I'm hoping this pushes wireless phone package prices down for competitors!
User avatar
Philip
SG VIP
Posts: 11732
Joined: Sat May 08, 1999 5:00 am
Location: Jacksonville, Florida

Post by Philip »

I don't see how decreasing competition would bring any prices down.
User avatar
Rainbow
Senior Member
Posts: 2936
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2001 10:02 am
Location: Pittsburgh

Post by Rainbow »

Philip wrote:I don't see how decreasing competition would bring any prices down.

Ditto, Ive been a Happy Tmobile Customer for 15 years, I'm NOT looking forward to this AT ALL.
User avatar
Dan
Posts: 18684
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2000 12:00 pm
Location: Orangevale ,Ca

Post by Dan »

I already pay out the ass for at&t now ! :(
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

Philip wrote:I don't see how decreasing competition would bring any prices down.

I see it as a increase in comp between say this new company and Verizon for example. If this new comp whatever they will call themselves pushes more coverage and so on then Verizon will have no choice but to drop prices and increase coverage along with better service. I guess you can go both ways with this slightly depending on factors from this merger.
User avatar
cybotron r_9
Senior Member
Posts: 4275
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2001 6:08 pm
Location: On the beach with 30 knots of breeze

Post by cybotron r_9 »

Rainbow wrote:Ditto, Ive been a Happy Tmobile Customer for 15 years, I'm NOT looking forward to this AT ALL.

NOt good, I was with Alltel when Verizon bought them, fvck Verizon and the horse they rode in on.....
User avatar
Leatherneck
Senior Member
Posts: 3655
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2000 12:00 am
Location: The Great Midwest

Post by Leatherneck »

Wow, makes the Comcast/NBC merger look like peanuts - 39BIL in cash & stock!
USMC RETIRED

Steve

Tacoma Guitar Forum
Lefty
Posts: 18882
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: SG Tavern

Post by Lefty »

Makes Sprint/Nextell the target for Verizon. I am getting out of AT&T&T/Mobile. Not sure what to do, but I am thinking DROID
User avatar
horsemen_
Senior Member
Posts: 1488
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2002 3:30 pm
Location: Edwards Air force base Ca

Post by horsemen_ »

Lefty wrote:Makes Sprint/Nextell the target for Verizon. I am getting out of AT&T&T/Mobile. Not sure what to do, but I am thinking DROID

att has droids
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

I remember "Ma-Bell"....and why they were broken up. Seems like Ma-Bell is returning.
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
User avatar
YARDofSTUF
Posts: 70006
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 12:00 am
Location: USA

Post by YARDofSTUF »

Sava700 wrote:I see it as a increase in comp between say this new company and Verizon for example. If this new comp whatever they will call themselves pushes more coverage and so on then Verizon will have no choice but to drop prices and increase coverage along with better service. I guess you can go both ways with this slightly depending on factors from this merger.

Its one less competitor in the market, its a bad sign for prices.
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

YARDofSTUF wrote:Its one less competitor in the market, its a bad sign for prices.

perhaps.. I've seen it go either way in some instances when you have more capital to pump into your hardware or infrastructure which will reach more customers which can allow you to drop prices while offering the same if not better service.
User avatar
Rainbow
Senior Member
Posts: 2936
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2001 10:02 am
Location: Pittsburgh

Post by Rainbow »

YARDofSTUF wrote:Its one less competitor in the market, its a bad sign for prices.

Exactly, I see it as an inevitable increase in My Bill, especially since I have a smart phone with NO data package, I don't use data I use wireless everywhere, AT&T won't let you have a smart phone with NO data, neither will Verizon....so I guess I switch to Sprint or someone else.
Lefty
Posts: 18882
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: SG Tavern

Post by Lefty »

horsemen_ wrote:att has droids

Yes, but I am sick of AT&T. I may do verizon, but I have till Aug. to decide.
User avatar
morbidpete
Posts: 7283
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2002 12:00 pm
Location: W. Warwick RI

Post by morbidpete »

Lefty wrote:Yes, but I am sick of AT&T. I may do verizon, but I have till Aug. to decide.


IMHO I would go with sprint, They seem to have the best droids out, Plus the new EVO View is just plain Sick! plus $69.99 (+$10 for 4g) completely and utterly unlimited everything. Depending on coverage in your area, You can beat it. If work didnt pay for my iP4 I would still be on sprint with my evo
Lefty
Posts: 18882
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: SG Tavern

Post by Lefty »

morbidpete wrote:IMHO I would go with sprint, They seem to have the best droids out, Plus the new EVO View is just plain Sick! plus $69.99 (+$10 for 4g) completely and utterly unlimited everything. Depending on coverage in your area, You can beat it. If work didnt pay for my iP4 I would still be on sprint with my evo
I have no 4g coverage up here. 3g is it for this backwoods state.
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

Lefty wrote:I have no 4g coverage up here. 3g is it for this backwoods state.

It's very unlikely there is 4G speeds per coverage anywhere just yet. They are hyping it but aren't producing the speeds yet.
Lefty
Posts: 18882
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: SG Tavern

Post by Lefty »

Sava700 wrote:It's very unlikely there is 4G speeds per coverage anywhere just yet. They are hyping it but aren't producing the speeds yet.
I dont think it is even an official standard yet. From what I understand there are flavors of it. Can you say betamax?
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

http://www.bnet.com/blog/marketing-stra ... Content.10
How will the ATT acquisition of T-Mobile benefit customers?

Unlike the predictions of the naysayers, the ATT acquisition of T-Mobile has the opportunity to help customers for the following reasons.

Better coverage. The complementary spectrum positions and operations of the two networks will give better coverage to the combined customer base.
Clearer choice and less confusion. Since both networks are GSM, the combined network will give customers a clearer brand choice - differentiating it from CDMA networks used by Verizon and Sprint (also rumored to be flirting with merger talks).
Wider iPhone and iPad distribution. T-Mobile will inherit the right to sell the iPhone and other Apple wireless products.
Better service. AT&T can learn from T-Mobile’s reputation for better customer service.
Post Reply