Roody wrote:Setting up trick or treating to where those of faith have to choose between services or trick or treating is a very bad PR move. I applaud any town who doesn't put families in that situation.
Well since all seems to point to a religion tie in then fine...
If it was moved for religious reasons then its just stupid. Last I checked churches are open more times then just Sundays, after dark. Having it on a Sunday or a Saturday changes nothing as far as church going families are concerned. People could go to a Saturday mass, a Sunday morning mass, or a Sunday afternoon mass.
The only people forced to choose between Halloween and church are those that refuse to alter their schedule, and its not like a last minute thing, you kinda have all year to plan on going to a different mass, and thats only if you are one of those at a late Sunday mass.
There is no religious conflict, no matter how hard you try and make one. And what PR move? You are saying it would have been a bad PR move for a town to have done what most others did? How bad of a PR move is it to let people celebrate on the day of the holiday? Obviously not bad as I don't see towns across the country facing angry mobs of church goers threatening to overthrow local governments.
I even know of some priests that have told their perish not to worry about missing a mass or their kids getting very into their costumes/characters and to enjoy it because its a fun celebration.
I can see moving the celebration for the safety of the kids and to avoid a late night and sugar rush the night before school, but I can not see moving it from its normal time, so that instead of happening on Sunday night mass, it instead happens on Saturday night mass.