Roody wrote:Perhaps you misunderstood my point. There is nothing to suggest your theories of domestic violence etc. Of course you no longer want to discuss other suggestions per your last post to Jeremy so not much else can be said.
Jeremy just wants to be "jeremy" and I won't continue his discussions on the subject.... as for anyone else or just discussing something from myself to myself I may or may not continue doing.
Sava700 wrote:I'm done arguing with you...obviously you won't give up.
Sava700 wrote:Jeremy just wants to be "jeremy" and I won't continue his discussions on the subject.... as for anyone else or just discussing something from myself to myself I may or may not continue doing.
It's not my fault you can't read.
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." - Stephen Hawking
Sava700 wrote:Jeremy just wants to be "jeremy" and I won't continue his discussions on the subject.... as for anyone else or just discussing something from myself to myself I may or may not continue doing.
Quite frankly no one is surprised. You have a history of bailing on conversations once your arguments are proven to not be based in fact. It's why you constantly get grief from multiple members about your statements.
Roody wrote:Quite frankly no one is surprised. You have a history of bailing on conversations once your arguments are proven to not be based in fact. It's why you constantly get grief from multiple members about your statements.
I'm not bailing on anything...I really don't have to defend that either.
Back to subject... I still stand behind what I said I believe happened regardless of news reports on any certain station... I think TMZ is getting the big picture... facts are pointing to some sort of altercation.
Sava700 wrote:already stated them early in the thread.... Dude, you tell me what you think what happened??
Show me where you stated them? It's not my job to prove his innocence Sava. This is America. It's your job to prove his guilt. I looked back at this thread and seen nothing that you have stated that proves he was involved in a domestic situation with his wife.
Roody wrote:Show me where you stated them? It's not my job to prove his innocence Sava. This is America. It's your job to prove his guilt. I looked back at this thread and seen nothing that you have stated that proves he was involved in a domestic situation with his wife.
Show me where.
I don't want to prove his guilt.... LOL I'm just saying what I think happened.. he's already guilty of hitting a tree and a fire hydrant... I don't have to prove that.
Don't get me wrong, I like Tiger...I think he's a great golf player. But this whole thing stinks of raw meat and cover up by someone... I guess we will find out soon what really happened.
Sava700 wrote:I don't want to prove his guilt.... LOL I'm just saying what I think happened.. he's already guilty of hitting a tree and a fire hydrant... I don't have to prove that.
Don't get me wrong, I like Tiger...I think he's a great golf player. But this whole thing stinks of raw meat and cover up by someone... I guess we will find out soon what really happened.
You'd just said, a few minutes ago, "facts are pointing to some sort of altercation."
To which Roody asked, "Which facts would those be?"
But now you say, "I'm just saying what I think happened"
Wtf?
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." - Stephen Hawking
Interesting... why won't he give a interview to the police on such a minor accident?
State troopers have asked to question him three times about the wreck, but they have yet to be successful, with Woods canceling a third scheduled interview Sunday, Florida Highway Patrol spokeswoman Sgt. Kim Montes told CNN.
"If we're unable to meet with him, we'll move on with our investigation," Montes said. She called the delays "very unusual, because it's such a minor accident."
What is even more strange is the driver side door wasn't damaged at all...so why did she break out the rear window and how did she manage to pull him from the front seat out the back in such a low amount of time?
TMZ has over 120,000 voters giving 94% saying Tiger is hiding something...
TMZ has those pictures on their site front page...
jeremyboycool wrote:You'd just said, a few minutes ago, "facts are pointing to some sort of altercation."
To which Roody asked, "Which facts would those be?"
But now you say, "I'm just saying what I think happened"
Wtf?
I got a pm recently from a member here telling me and I quote "sava is just ignorant on the issues". You know as well as I do Jeremy that this is classic Sava. He makes remarks insisting his views are the right ones, and then when asked to support his theories he fails to do so. In your case his response is to add you to ignore. Better for him to act (In his mind) as if no one dared to question the absurdity of his claims then to admit his views are nothing other then an opinion and not a fact in which he suggested and you so ably quoted.
Sava700 wrote:lol no conspiracy...but hey regardless of waiting on facts (that may get covered up at some point) its hard to think anything else happened.... look at the facts so far.
1. Hit two different objects on different sides of a wide drive way.
2. Golf club to a window when I'm sure there were plenty of other objects near by...does he keep these things everywhere in the house for decorations?
3. Its a long run from his home to the end of that drive way with a golf club unless your already in pursuit.
don't judge my thoughts here as I'm not trying to judge him in this thread, I just think its good conversation to speculate on what happened..that's all.
For those curious these are the facts that Sava states supports his claim. I asked him to quote them in here but he didn't wish to do so. Since others have been curious on what he is thinking I felt it fair to bring it to the attention of others the things he believes are facts.
Roody wrote:For those curious these are the facts that Sava states supports his claim. I asked him to quote them in here but he didn't wish to do so. Since others have been curious on what he is thinking I felt it fair to bring it to the attention of others the things he believes are facts.
Sava700 wrote:I don't "believe" anything...they are facts.
Clearly the urgency you took to state that publicly after more then one person wanted to know which facts you spoke of support your theory.
In particular I find this one amusing. I imagine every Judge in the country will feel this is a fine argument on your part if you were crazy enough to make it.
Golf club to a window when I'm sure there were plenty of other objects near by...does he keep these things everywhere in the house for decorations?
Because nothing else says guilt more then using a golf club to break a window.
Roody wrote:Clearly the urgency you took to state that publicly after more then one person wanted to know which facts you spoke of support your theory.
In particular I find this one amusing. I imagine every Judge in the country will feel this is a fine argument on your part if you were crazy enough to make it.
Because nothing else says guilt more then using a golf club to break a window.
The post was at the beginning of the thread the whole time.. It was a easy find.
As for the golf club to the window.. look a few posts back and the picture... I can't figure out why she would break the back window and drag him from the front seat to the back window when the front drivers side door had no damage... perhaps someone will figure that out one day.
Sava700 wrote:The post was at the beginning of the thread the whole time.. It was a easy find.
As for the golf club to the window.. look a few posts back and the picture... I can't figure out why she would break the back window and drag him from the front seat to the back window when the front drivers side door had no damage... perhaps someone will figure that out one day.
You do realize that people aren't arguing that you might be right. They are arguing that you think you are right based on the information you provided. It's not out of the realm of possibility for a domestic issue to be a part of a situation like this, but there is no proof that there was. Your golf club argument in no way proves a domestic issue between the two.
Sava700 wrote:What is even more strange is the driver side door wasn't damaged at all...so why did she break out the rear window and how did she manage to pull him from the front seat out the back in such a low amount of time?
SUV locked, wife panicked and went for a club instead of the spare keys, unlocked car and took him out the front seat?
God I'm posting in this thread again, I feel so dirty.
Xpunge wrote:Why would you as a moderator on this board, reveal the context of a "private message" about another member on the open forum, other than to troll.
Sad really, your a mod for gods sake.
I gave that some thought last night and although it would be impossible for anyone to know who I was talking about you are right Xpunge that it wasn't necessary for me to do that and I was wrong for having done so. My apologies to Sava, the person who made the remark and everyone else for even stating that. It won't happen again.
More info that "may" have had something to do with wreck..
Nightclub hostess Rachel Uchitel is denying allegations of an affair with golfer Tiger Woods, but now a second woman is coming forward saying that she had a relationship with the golf great.
TMZ.com reports that Jaimee Grubbs, who has appeared on the VH1 reality show "Tool Academy," claims that she met Woods in Las Vegas in April 2007, when she was working as a 21-year-old cocktail waitress, and began what she says was a 31-month-long affair.
According to Us Weekly, Grubbs has more than 300 text messages from Woods, who married Elin Nordegren in 2004.
The magazine, which comes out tomorrow and claims that Grubbs had 20 sexual encounters with the star athlete, also has photos, racy messages and a Nov. 24 voicemail allegedly from Woods, in which he suggests his wife may know about the alleged affair.
Allegations have also been made that Rachel Uchitel, a New York nightclub hostess, carried on a relationship with the married athlete. She claims the rumors are untrue.
Jaimee Grubbs, who has appeared on the VH1 reality show "Tool Academy," claims that she met Woods in Las Vegas in April 2007, when she was working as a 21-year-old cocktail waitress, and began what she says was a 31-month-long affair. Ms. Grubbs has made similar claims against other high profile celebrities in what police have determined to be a quest for attentions and/or money.
Fixed for truth.
People will forget what you said... and people will forget what you did... but people will never forget how you made them feel.
You can be sure of one thing. If his wife stays with him then after his affairs then Tiger had a rock solid pre-nup. If she goes then it's because she knows she can take him to the cleaners.
They've only been together for 5 yrs and he was a millionaire before that, so his prenup has got to be rock solid. He may as well kiss half of his last 5 yrs of earnings away though. LOL
