Maximum PC article Windows 7 - Vista - XP
- YeOldeStonecat
- SG VIP
- Posts: 51171
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
- Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England
Maximum PC article Windows 7 - Vista - XP
http://www.maximumpc.com/article/review ... page=0%2C0
Not so much to show the performance differences, but the beginning give some nice highlights on some of the new features of 7.
Not so much to show the performance differences, but the beginning give some nice highlights on some of the new features of 7.
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
Guinness for Strength!!!
I like the "shake window" feature.
Grab the window with the mouse, shake it, it maximizes.
I just wish that the taskbar was more customizable. One should be able to set its transparency, colors, etc, as in most Linux window managers.
Grab the window with the mouse, shake it, it maximizes.
I just wish that the taskbar was more customizable. One should be able to set its transparency, colors, etc, as in most Linux window managers.
No one has any right to force data on you
and command you to believe it or else.
If it is not true for you, it isn't true.
LRH
and command you to believe it or else.
If it is not true for you, it isn't true.
LRH
- YeOldeStonecat
- SG VIP
- Posts: 51171
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
- Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England
Yeah the "shake" feature is neat...wonder why they came up with that though, as it's easier (less effort) to just double tap the top of a window to max it.
I miss the "Show Desktop" button in the quicklaunch bar we always had in the past...even back to Win9X.
Bummer there's (at least I haven't found a way yet) to bring a classic desktop back. For home users, no problem. From for a business network environment...supporting end users, it's important to use to be able to walk end users to managing my computer, or managing network connections..in the easiest manner.
I'm happy they improved the wireless network configuration, as Vista was a huuuge step backwards there.
I miss the "Show Desktop" button in the quicklaunch bar we always had in the past...even back to Win9X.
Bummer there's (at least I haven't found a way yet) to bring a classic desktop back. For home users, no problem. From for a business network environment...supporting end users, it's important to use to be able to walk end users to managing my computer, or managing network connections..in the easiest manner.
I'm happy they improved the wireless network configuration, as Vista was a huuuge step backwards there.
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
Guinness for Strength!!!
I miss the classic menu that was still available in Vista. I absolutely hate the new start menu. I wish there was at least a tweak to "always show" the programs menu w/out having to click "programs".
No one has any right to force data on you
and command you to believe it or else.
If it is not true for you, it isn't true.
LRH
and command you to believe it or else.
If it is not true for you, it isn't true.
LRH
- YARDofSTUF
- Posts: 70006
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 12:00 am
- Location: USA
- YeOldeStonecat
- SG VIP
- Posts: 51171
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
- Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England
- YeOldeStonecat
- SG VIP
- Posts: 51171
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
- Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England
Agreed...I like to show them all up front, and the "jump list" doesn't seem to be adapting to my habits.TonyT wrote:I miss the classic menu that was still available in Vista. I absolutely hate the new start menu. I wish there was at least a tweak to "always show" the programs menu w/out having to click "programs".
And wish the Run box was there by default...gotta hit a checkbox to turn that on. The run box is another useful feature to have when supporting end users.
I've made it my fulltime OS on my primary laptop, I had read battery performance was supposed to be improved...but so far it has a much shorter runtime than Vista did on this laptop. Could be a coincidence that my battery is starting to go..but it sure seemed to start immediately after doing the install. Or that Lenovo's Vista drivers don't work so well with Win7 yet.
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
Guinness for Strength!!!
-
24giovanni
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2943
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:03 pm
If you want to put it back where it was here you goYeOldeStonecat wrote:Ahh cool..there she is. Just as handy over there.
http://www.askvg.com/how-to-get-the-goo ... windows-7/
- YeOldeStonecat
- SG VIP
- Posts: 51171
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
- Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England
Ahh yeah...I remember that, more than once I whipped up that shortcut by hand just as in that article.24giovanni wrote:If you want to put it back where it was here you go
http://www.askvg.com/how-to-get-the-goo ... windows-7/
I see Eset NOD32 version 2.7 on those screenies....apparently it runs fine in Windows 7.
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
Guinness for Strength!!!
While Intel and other manufacturers recommend using the notebook manufacturers' drivers, I have never run into any problems using hardware manufacturer drivers. For example, a lenovo laptop may have an ATI video driver at the Lenovo site, but the ATI site also has the same driver, usually newer. Most of the time the only differences are branding names.YeOldeStonecat wrote:Agreed...I like to show them all up front, and the "jump list" doesn't seem to be adapting to my habits.
Or that Lenovo's Vista drivers don't work so well with Win7 yet.
No one has any right to force data on you
and command you to believe it or else.
If it is not true for you, it isn't true.
LRH
and command you to believe it or else.
If it is not true for you, it isn't true.
LRH
- YeOldeStonecat
- SG VIP
- Posts: 51171
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
- Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England
Typically I agree. The FireGL V5200 256 meg in my case, last time I did a rebuild on this laptop w/Vista, for some reason the ones from ATI/AMD didn't settle in. Lenovo often doing a touch of proprietary...such as with their Intel Wireless NICs.TonyT wrote:While Intel and other manufacturers recommend using the notebook manufacturers' drivers, I have never run into any problems using hardware manufacturer drivers. For example, a lenovo laptop may have an ATI video driver at the Lenovo site, but the ATI site also has the same driver, usually newer. Most of the time the only differences are branding names.
But what I was referring to about Lenovo's Vista drivers was the "System Drivers" (required for the hot keys to function properly with OSD as well as other system specific functions), and "Power Management" drivers. With laptops, the laptop vendors site is the only source of those drivers.
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
Guinness for Strength!!!