Oklahoma Vs. Florida

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:58 pm

Come on Sooners you keep blowing chances.

Sava700 · Post by **Sava700** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:59 pm

GO GATORS!!! CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP!!

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:10 pm

At halftime there is no way I think either of these teams are better then USC. No way in H-E-L-L.

Right now in Austin, Los Angeles and Utah there is some seriously ticked off football players.

Sava700 · Post by **Sava700** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:13 pm

Roody wrote:At halftime there is no way I think either of these teams are better then USC. No way in H-E-L-L.

Right now in Austin, Los Angeles and Utah there is some seriously ticked off football players.

yeah neither team is playing anywhere like they should be or have been this season...that long dry spell I think hurts them the most. Bring on that playoff!

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:14 pm

Sava700 wrote: Bring on that playoff!

I'm with ya man. This crap is ridiculous. Again I think Utah players and fans have the most to be upset at, but as a USC fan I just don't buy what Oklahoma and Florida has to offer. Although at this point I think the Sooners have more to offer.

Brk · Post by **Brk** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:50 pm

Can you FEEL the implosion?

fastchevy · Post by **fastchevy** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:07 pm

Roody wrote:At halftime there is no way I think either of these teams are better then USC. No way in H-E-L-L.

Right now in Austin, Los Angeles and Utah there is some seriously ticked off football players.

Give me a break man...it's called 2 evenly matched teams, who has studied each other intensely...I don't see USC out there....

tr87526 · Post by **tr87526** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:08 pm

This is nerve racking..... 14 - 14

horsemen_ · Post by **horsemen_** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:27 pm

come on uf cant win this bs

horsemen_ · Post by **horsemen_** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:34 pm

game over

:*(

Sava700 · Post by **Sava700** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:36 pm

I think its safe to say its over.. GO GATORS!!!

SUPERMAN!

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:36 pm

Roody wrote:At halftime there is no way I think either of these teams are better then USC. No way in H-E-L-L.

Right now in Austin, Los Angeles and Utah there is some seriously ticked off football players.

I can't remember who but I think it was the State's Attorney General for Utah is getting ready to sue the BCS for having a monopoly. LMAO

Sava700 · Post by **Sava700** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:37 pm

downhill wrote:I can't remember who but I think it was the State's Attorney General for Utah is getting ready to sue the BCS for having a monopoly. LMAO

With the Utah attorney general investigating the bowl system for a possible antitrust violation,

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/bowls08/n ... id=3818921

tr87526 · Post by **tr87526** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:39 pm

Crap! FU scored, 3 min left. I think the fat lady is getting ready to sing

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:40 pm

fastchevy wrote:Give me a break man...it's called 2 evenly matched teams, who has studied each other intensely...I don't see USC out there....

No you don't and that's what's wrong with the system. The situation wasn't decided on the field and Florida is about to be National Champs, but it will be a disputed National Title because Utah, Texas and USC all had the same record or in Utah's case a better one. Each year it seems like the BCS gets sillier. This year we had 5 teams with 1 loss and 1 with no losses heading into their bowl game. Yet somehow it's decided that 2 of those teams are better then the other 4 because someone merely says so? It should have been decided on the field.

tr87526 · Post by **tr87526** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:41 pm

4 and out!!!???? What was with that last play?? I really thought OU could win this game.

Oh well there's next year.

Sava700 · Post by **Sava700** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:49 pm

And the Gators win it!

fastchevy · Post by **fastchevy** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:49 pm

Awesome game....FU just was able to figure OU out in the later part of the game.

That was a #1 vs #2 game for sure

Sava700 · Post by **Sava700** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:50 pm

fastchevy wrote:Awesome game....FU just was able to figure OU out in the later part of the game.

That was a #1 vs #2 game for sure

well I would say Florida #1, Utah #2 and USC #3 with OU dropping to #4 or maybe lower.

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:51 pm

Sava700 wrote:well I would say Florida #1, Utah #2 and USC #3 with OU dropping to #4 or maybe lower.

Come tomorrow it definitely won't be a #1 and #2 game. I have a ton of respect for the Oklahoma program and the UF program it's just irritating to see how this played out. Actually correct that. It's irritating to see how it didn't play out.

fastchevy · Post by **fastchevy** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:54 pm

Sava700 wrote:well I would say Florida #1, Utah #2 and USC #3 with OU dropping to #4 or maybe lower.

Sure thing man..keep telling yourself that

You guys are so butthurt over Utah, there is a formula and in this case the formula was pretty damn accurate. Utah would have got stomped into oblivion by any of the teams you mentioned. Yeah their undefeated, against who??

Not much will happen with the Utah lawsuit.

fastchevy · Post by **fastchevy** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:56 pm

Roody wrote:Come tomorrow it definitely won't be a #1 and #2 game. I have a ton of respect for the Oklahoma program and the UF program it's just irritating to see how this played out. Actually correct that. It's irritating to see how it didn't play out.

That were effective at stopping each other, that's what happens man. Did you honestly expect one team to completely dominate the other?

horsemen_ · Post by **horsemen_** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:56 pm

ou lost when they didnt kick the fg in the 2ed that would have givent them the lead.

going up 10-7 at the 1/2 whould made fu play from behind and also on the last drive all ou would have need was a td to tie.

this is on the oc of hc who said go for it on 4th and 2

joecool169 · Post by **joecool169** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:56 pm

it is rigged

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:57 pm

fastchevy wrote:
Sure thing man..keep telling yourself that

You guys are so butthurt over Utah, there is a formula and in this case the formula was pretty damn accurate. Utah would have got stomped into oblivion by any of the teams you mentioned. Yeah their undefeated, against who??

Undefeated against 3 ranked teams this year that's who. As for the polls tomorrow Sava is probably right. It will likely be

1. Florida
2. Utah
3. USC
4. Oklahoma
5. Alabama.

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:58 pm

fastchevy wrote:That were effective at stopping each other, that's what happens man. Did you honestly expect one team to completely dominate the other?

Not at all. I do however know the system has become a farce when you don't even decide the champion on the field and instead you decide it on a piece of paper.

fastchevy · Post by **fastchevy** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:59 pm

Roody wrote:Undefeated against 3 ranked teams this year that's who. As for the polls tomorrow Sava is probably right. It will likely be

1. Florida
2. Utah
3. USC
4. Oklahoma
5. Alabama.

Oh..3 ranked teams...well then I take it back

horsemen_ · Post by **horsemen_** » Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:59 pm

well bama gave fu more the ou did and utah killed bama so who to say they would not beat uf

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 12:00 am

fastchevy wrote:Oh..3 ranked teams...well then I take it back

I am guessing you watched Utah kick the crap out of Alabama. If you don't think in 1 game that Utah could pull a similiar upset then I am surprised and I imagine you know it could definitely happen.

fastchevy · Post by **fastchevy** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 12:03 am

Roody wrote:I am guessing you watched Utah kick the crap out of Alabama. If you don't think in 1 game that Utah could pull a similiar upset then I am surprised and I imagine you know it could definitely happen.

I think many of Utah's wins were um upsets if that's what you call them

Sorry, just IMHO

Roody · Post by **Roody** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 12:04 am

fastchevy wrote:I think many of Utah's wins were um upsets if that's what you call them
Sorry, just IMHO

Hey I don't disagree with that. Facts are even if they were all upsets they still had more upsets then anyone else had straight up wins.

tr87526 · Post by **tr87526** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:03 am

No, OU now has 2 losses so the rankings will be more like

1. Florida
2. Utah
3. Texas
4. USC
5. Alabama
6. Oklahoma

Gixxer · Post by **Gixxer** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 7:35 am

Roody wrote:At halftime there is no way I think either of these teams are better then USC. No way in H-E-L-L.

Right now in Austin, Los Angeles and Utah there is some seriously ticked off football players.

i guess we will never know.

Gixxer · Post by **Gixxer** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 7:36 am

fastchevy wrote:Give me a break man...it's called 2 evenly matched teams, who has studied each other intensely...I don't see USC out there....

i think that is a fair statement

Gixxer · Post by **Gixxer** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 7:43 am

tr87526 wrote:4 and out!!!???? What was with that last play?? I really thought OU could win this game.

Oh well there's next year.

there is not next year for you. QB is outta there.

fastchevy wrote:Awesome game....FU just was able to figure OU out in the later part of the game.

That was a #1 vs #2 game for sure

FLA outworked them...period.

horsemen_ wrote:well bama gave fu more the ou did and utah killed bama so who to say they would not beat uf

ahhhhhhhhhh, but that's why they play the game.

Sava700 · Post by **Sava700** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 9:59 am

fastchevy wrote:
Sure thing man..keep telling yourself that

You guys are so butthurt over Utah, there is a formula and in this case the formula was pretty damn accurate. Utah would have got stomped into oblivion by any of the teams you mentioned. Yeah their undefeated, against who??

Not much will happen with the Utah lawsuit.

Looks like its true too..although I disagree with alot of the top 25 I think the top5 is about right.