Yes we have gotten warnings. As for infractions I can tell you I haven't gotten one since I have been a mod.Izzo wrote:No, I won't. and again ....it's a simple question...yes or no......take your time.
New politics & religion sub-forum
Actually I do see your point on making a premium membership for the privilege of posting in a private forum.UOD wrote:Well, since you put it that way....my forum suggestion is tied into the business end. I did say to tie it into premium membership. That's how ARS does it and they must be making A LOT of money on that because they have to pay no matter what...I paid.
I just have a feeling it would be a ghost town as this site has no where near the active participation as say, ARS does.
Like DH states UOD it's not that we think it's a terrible idea. Shoot I wouldn't have a problem with trying it. That said I do agree with Philip and DH that it's probably going to cause more problems. Either the GD forum will lose alot of posts or the new political forum will drop in interest within a few weeks.
Izzo wrote:It is the point and that wasn't the question. It's a pretty simple question which can be answer either with a yes or a no. We're not interested in introspection... do you get infractions?
Yes I have. LOL Of course it was a test.
Now, why would you think that I'd need one? If you do, can you link me to a specific example?
Roody wrote:Good for them. We believe it's necessary at times unfortunately.
But what does it achieve? Harmony?
I just want to carry on adult conversation the way I would carry on if I were at work or with family/friends. SG is tame. I don't know where you go...but this place is like the wading end of a kiddie pool lol. I get mad when some of the brats poop in the pool.
Here is the thing man. You state you want to carry on an adult conversation. The thing is to the best of my knowledge no one on staff myself included thinks adult conversations are filled with personal attacks on others.UOD wrote:But what does it achieve? Harmony?
I just want to carry on adult conversation the way I would carry on if I were at work or with family/friends. SG is tame. I don't know where you go...but this place is like the wading end of a kiddie pool lol. I get mad when some of the brats poop in the pool.![]()
Roody wrote:Like DH states UOD it's not that we think it's a terrible idea. Shoot I wouldn't have a problem with trying it. That said I do agree with Philip and DH that it's probably going to cause more problems. Either the GD forum will lose alot of posts or the new political forum will drop in interest within a few weeks.
I guess I just don't understand how it's going to cause more problems. We already have problems...I suggest HIDING them in a private forum. If there is leakage....BAN.
It really is just that simple. I know without a shadow of a doubt that I can keep my self straight and contain my diatribe to that forum if it were created.
downhill wrote:Judging from some of the PM's I get, I have not a single doubt why traffic suffers.
Are you suggesting that I take as truth what you say? Are you also saying that potential new members PM you ahead of time and complain about the behavior within certain threads? And unless you post 'em it's all BS anyway.
Offensive
Personally I think it would be worth a shot. If it works great and if it doesn't we can just move the posts and close the political forum.UOD wrote:I guess I just don't understand how it's going to cause more problems. We already have problems...I suggest HIDING them in a private forum. If there is leakage....BAN.
It really is just that simple. I know without a shadow of a doubt that I can keep my self straight and contain my diatribe to that forum if it were created.
If he is getting the kind of PM's I get they are basically supporting the idea that this site would be better off if you weren't on it.Izzo wrote:Are you suggesting that I take as truth what you say? Are you also saying that potential new members PM you ahead of time and complain about the behavior within certain threads? And unless you post 'em it's all BS anyway.
True, telling people the facts and showing them the truth can be hurtful to their ego. And of course, they will say that they are being attacked. It's subjective.Roody wrote:Here is the thing man. You state you want to carry on an adult conversation. The thing is to the best of my knowledge no one on staff myself included thinks adult conversations are filled with personal attacks on others.
But again, and I think I've said this many times.....going into the forum is at your own risk...so if you get attacked....boo on you for asking for it. Nobody else can see it unless they are a premium member.
I just don't understand the resistance to it. I don't think it would be as doomsday as some of you make it out to be. I think you'd actually see some people work out their own conflicts in short order.
Are you calling me a liar? Again?Izzo wrote:Are you suggesting that I take as truth what you say? Are you also saying that potential new members PM you ahead of time and complain about the behavior within certain threads? And unless you post 'em it's all BS anyway.
Look...I've called you out before. Put em up, dude. List every single instance of a mod that's done you wrong. Your blues song is a longer read than War and Peace but with a lot less substance.
It's either that or show all of Speedguide that you have not a leg to stand on. What will it be, Izzo?
Not just that. Personally I would love to see an example of where he was done wrong by a mod regarding a situation he didn't at first instigate.downhill wrote:Are you calling me a liar? Again?
Look...I've called you out before. Put em up, dude. List every single instance of a mod that's done you wrong. Your blues song is a longer read than War and Peace but with a lot less substance.
It's either that or show all of Speedguide that you have not a leg to stand on. What will it be, Izzo?
Again with answering questions with more questions. Are you unable to to directly answer anything? It was a simple question that you answered by beating around the bush and then claiming I somehow said, in this thread, you deserved one. Please read more carefully before posting.....mmmmmkay?downhill wrote:Are you calling me a liar? Again?
Look...I've called you out before. Put em up, dude. List every single instance of a mod that's done you wrong. Your blues song is a longer read than War and Peace but with a lot less substance.
It's either that or show all of Speedguide that you have not a leg to stand on. What will it be, Izzo?
Offensive
It's still a bad idea...
There are a few great debaters here. They love to argue and pick apart those that can not debate very well.
You will not change my opinion on religion and politics.
Nor am I going to research your comments for validity and spend hours doing point - counter-point (Jane, you ignorant slut)
Of course, not doing so will make you victorious and feel superior.
If we could be civil, we wouldn't need separate forums.
There are a few great debaters here. They love to argue and pick apart those that can not debate very well.
You will not change my opinion on religion and politics.
Nor am I going to research your comments for validity and spend hours doing point - counter-point (Jane, you ignorant slut)
Of course, not doing so will make you victorious and feel superior.
If we could be civil, we wouldn't need separate forums.
Insulting and rude? Again grow some thicker skin. How many times have you posted sh*tfaced? If you're offended by what I said that's your problem not mine.downhill wrote:Back to the insulting and rude behavior that is the crux of what we are talking about.
While not surprised, I must say I'm disappointed.
Offensive
Back to that old standby are we?Izzo wrote:Again with answering questions with more questions. Are you unable to to directly answer anything? It was a simple question that you answered by beating around the bush and then claiming I somehow said, in this thread, you deserved one. Please read more carefully before posting.....mmmmmkay?
Thanks Izzo. You've just shown all of Speedguide that indeed you really don't have a leg to stand on.
Beating around the bush? LOL All one has to do is read this quote of yours.
A leg to stand on? Again, have someone read the thread to you and point out where I said you deserved one. Stand by? And DH....psst......thanks for showing SG how incompetent you really are.downhill wrote:Back to that old standby are we?
Thanks Izzo. You've just shown all of Speedguide that indeed you really don't have a leg to stand on.
Beating around the bush? LOL All one has to do is read this quote of yours.
Offensive
I got some positive rep for my remarks here.Izzo wrote:You can't prove it can you?
https://www.speedguide.net/forums/ ... ost2231190
That's the extent of what I will share with you though.
Ironically you avoided answering my question in that thread much like you are avoiding answering DH's question in this thread.
Back into a corner?downhill wrote:Here we go again. When backed into a corner, insult and name call.
Izzo you know better.
Offensive
So, I got more rep than you do and all but two other members ....what does that say?Roody wrote:I got some positive rep for my remarks here.
https://www.speedguide.net/forums/ ... ost2231190
That's the extent of what I will share with you though.
Offensive