Nod32 v. AVG

General Network security, firewalls, port filtering/forwarding, wireless security, anti-spyware, as well as spam control and privacy discussions.
Post Reply

do you prefer Nod32 or AVG?

Nod32
10
91%
AVG
1
9%
 
Total votes: 11

User avatar
ghettoside
SG Elite
Posts: 5134
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 5:18 pm
Location: At Large in the US

Nod32 v. AVG

Post by ghettoside »

If you only had a choice between Nod32 or AVG, which would you use?

taking a poll, looking for feedback.
Norm wrote:
There are idiots everywhere.

At work, in forums, in poetry classes, everywhere!
User avatar
YARDofSTUF
Posts: 70006
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 12:00 am
Location: USA

Post by YARDofSTUF »

NOD32.

It finds more windows/macro/sript viruses than AVG on http://www.av-comparatives.org/ tests.

AVG has improved and in other areas like trojans it is slightly better, but its also a slower scanner, and looking at the retrospective test on av comparatives its easy to see that NOD's method or frequent updates makes it a better option agaisnt unknown threats.
User avatar
ghettoside
SG Elite
Posts: 5134
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 5:18 pm
Location: At Large in the US

Post by ghettoside »

YARDofSTUF wrote:NOD32.

It finds more windows/macro/sript viruses than AVG on http://www.av-comparatives.org/ tests.

AVG has improved and in other areas like trojans it is slightly better, but its also a slower scanner, and looking at the retrospective test on av comparatives its easy to see that NOD's method or frequent updates makes it a better option agaisnt unknown threats.
QFT
Norm wrote:
There are idiots everywhere.

At work, in forums, in poetry classes, everywhere!
CableDude
SG VIP
Posts: 26801
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2001 12:00 pm

Post by CableDude »

Nod32
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

Not even in the same league....NOD32.
*Lighter impact on your system
*Much more frequent updates
*Superior heuristics
*Proven track record of superior detection rates
*Less false positives
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
CableDude
SG VIP
Posts: 26801
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2001 12:00 pm

Post by CableDude »

YeOldeStonecat wrote:Not even in the same league....NOD32.
*Lighter impact on your system
*Much more frequent updates
*Superior heuristics
*Proven track record of superior detection rates
*Less false positives
I like the new interface. :D
User avatar
ghettoside
SG Elite
Posts: 5134
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 5:18 pm
Location: At Large in the US

Post by ghettoside »

wow, with all the avg enthusiasts here I'm surprised to not find a heated debate here. :(

Does this mean no-one here prefers avg over Nod? :confused:
Norm wrote:
There are idiots everywhere.

At work, in forums, in poetry classes, everywhere!
User avatar
YARDofSTUF
Posts: 70006
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 12:00 am
Location: USA

Post by YARDofSTUF »

ghettoside wrote:wow, with all the avg enthusiasts here I'm surprised to not find a heated debate here. :(

Does this mean no-one here prefers avg over Nod? :confused:
Theres a bunch of AVG users and some Avast users here, most liekly they use it cuz its free.

It amazes me that people continue to use them so much when Avira Antivir free edition is so much better, its as dominant over the free ones as NOD32 and KAV are over the paid competition.
User avatar
ghettoside
SG Elite
Posts: 5134
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 5:18 pm
Location: At Large in the US

Post by ghettoside »

YARDofSTUF wrote:Theres a bunch of AVG users and some Avast users here, most liekly they use it cuz its free.
agreed. I'm just a little surprised we didn't hear from the retail avg users. I didn't specify free or retail so the door would be open for them to jump in.
YARDofSTUF wrote:...It amazes me that people continue to use them so much when Avira Antivir free edition is so much better, its as dominant over the free ones as NOD32 and KAV are over the paid competition.
I used to recommend avira. I remember you and I discussed avira last year or the year before.

I don't recall which version it was that made me stop using it, I just remember lots of false positives, then I got hammered by a virus and it crossed 3 partitions in the blink of an eye, had to redo the whole rig cuz I couldn't clean the infection.

Considering your positive assessment of avira, I'll have to try it again on a test rig.

;)
Norm wrote:
There are idiots everywhere.

At work, in forums, in poetry classes, everywhere!
User avatar
YARDofSTUF
Posts: 70006
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 12:00 am
Location: USA

Post by YARDofSTUF »

Avira is still higher than avg and avast on false positives, but not as bad as it was in the past, Its kept a torrenting friend of mine safe of a while now too, wish I could make it give him flase positives for anythign he torrents, scare him away from using them lol
User avatar
OSULLY
Senior Member
Posts: 1347
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Location: Catskills NY

Post by OSULLY »

use avg, never tried nod
___________________________________________
User avatar
ghettoside
SG Elite
Posts: 5134
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 5:18 pm
Location: At Large in the US

Post by ghettoside »

YARDofSTUF wrote:...wish I could make it give him flase positives for anythign he torrents, scare him away from using them lol
lol :rotfl:
Norm wrote:
There are idiots everywhere.

At work, in forums, in poetry classes, everywhere!
Post Reply