grrr pipex!!!!!
-
PrivatePyle
- Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:33 pm
grrr pipex!!!!!
I recently upgraded my service from 2mb to 8mb max, on the day it was meant to upgrade, I rebooted router, no speed change, so tried every hour or two for next day, still no change.
Rang pipex up, and got through to 2nd line support, he told me it was a BT problem and would be fixed by next day as BT were not allowing me more than 2, next day, still no change.
Next day I rang pipex up, another 2nd line support guy told me I'm syncing at 8meg, so the reason I'm still getting only 2meg speed results is because of something he describes as fluctuation where your exchange works out best speed for you over a ten day period. Then said "if its not sorted in ten days ring back".
Now I think he is telling me story just to get rid of me, I told him about 5 times that my speeds are not fluctuating, and that everytime I reset router and do a speed test its consistently around the 1930kbps mark (what it was before my supposed upgrade), I even asked him for his definition of fluctuation as to me it does not mean a very stable result consistently for 3 days running.
Being told to ring back in ten days really made me quite mad, can anyone here who knows abit more about ADSL confirm that the fluctuation theory of theres does indeed sound like bull?
Rang pipex up, and got through to 2nd line support, he told me it was a BT problem and would be fixed by next day as BT were not allowing me more than 2, next day, still no change.
Next day I rang pipex up, another 2nd line support guy told me I'm syncing at 8meg, so the reason I'm still getting only 2meg speed results is because of something he describes as fluctuation where your exchange works out best speed for you over a ten day period. Then said "if its not sorted in ten days ring back".
Now I think he is telling me story just to get rid of me, I told him about 5 times that my speeds are not fluctuating, and that everytime I reset router and do a speed test its consistently around the 1930kbps mark (what it was before my supposed upgrade), I even asked him for his definition of fluctuation as to me it does not mean a very stable result consistently for 3 days running.
Being told to ring back in ten days really made me quite mad, can anyone here who knows abit more about ADSL confirm that the fluctuation theory of theres does indeed sound like bull?
-
PrivatePyle
- Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:33 pm
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 10.12.2007 01:02
IP address: 81.179.xx.xx
TCP options string: 0204058c01010402
MSS: 1420
MTU: 1460
TCP Window: 65535 (NOT multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 0
Unscaled RWIN : 65535
Reccomended RWINs: 65320, 130640, 261280, 522560
BDP limit (200ms): 2621kbps (328KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 1049kbps (131KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 105
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
Tested on: 10.12.2007 01:02
IP address: 81.179.xx.xx
TCP options string: 0204058c01010402
MSS: 1420
MTU: 1460
TCP Window: 65535 (NOT multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 0
Unscaled RWIN : 65535
Reccomended RWINs: 65320, 130640, 261280, 522560
BDP limit (200ms): 2621kbps (328KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 1049kbps (131KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 105
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
Try the following with TCP Optimizer:
General Settings tab:
Custom settings - check
Modify All Network Adapters - check
network adapter selection - your NIC
MTU 1492
TTL - 64
TCP Receive Window - 255552
MTU Discovery - Yes
Black Hole Detect - No
Selective Acks - Yes
Max Duplicate ACKs - 2
TCP 1323 Options:
Windows Scaling - checked
Timestamps - uncheck
Advanced Settings tab:
Max Connections per Server - 10
Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 20
LocalPriority - 1
Host Priority - 1
DNSPriority - 1
NetbtPriority - 1
Lan Browsing speedup - optimized
QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0
ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0
ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 80
MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0
NetFailureCacheTime - 0
NegativeSOACache Time - 0
LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768
Then select "Apply Changes" and reboot to take effect
After reboot, post a new TCP Analyzer report.
General Settings tab:
Custom settings - check
Modify All Network Adapters - check
network adapter selection - your NIC
MTU 1492
TTL - 64
TCP Receive Window - 255552
MTU Discovery - Yes
Black Hole Detect - No
Selective Acks - Yes
Max Duplicate ACKs - 2
TCP 1323 Options:
Windows Scaling - checked
Timestamps - uncheck
Advanced Settings tab:
Max Connections per Server - 10
Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 20
LocalPriority - 1
Host Priority - 1
DNSPriority - 1
NetbtPriority - 1
Lan Browsing speedup - optimized
QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0
ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0
ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 80
MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0
NetFailureCacheTime - 0
NegativeSOACache Time - 0
LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768
Then select "Apply Changes" and reboot to take effect
After reboot, post a new TCP Analyzer report.
-
PrivatePyle
- Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:33 pm
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 10.12.2007 01:13
IP address: 81.179.xx.xx
TCP options string: 0204058c0103030201010402
MSS: 1420
MTU: 1460
TCP Window: 255600 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 2
Unscaled RWIN : 63900
Reccomended RWINs: 65320, 130640, 261280, 522560
BDP limit (200ms): 10224kbps (1278KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 4090kbps (511KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 43
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
edit : Just did a speedtest aswell, its about the same, marginally slower, if that helps in analyzing the problem.
Tested on: 10.12.2007 01:13
IP address: 81.179.xx.xx
TCP options string: 0204058c0103030201010402
MSS: 1420
MTU: 1460
TCP Window: 255600 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 2
Unscaled RWIN : 63900
Reccomended RWINs: 65320, 130640, 261280, 522560
BDP limit (200ms): 10224kbps (1278KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 4090kbps (511KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 43
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
edit : Just did a speedtest aswell, its about the same, marginally slower, if that helps in analyzing the problem.
Try the following with TCP Optimizer for the moment:
General Settings tab:
Custom settings - check
Modify All Network Adapters - check
network adapter selection - your NIC
MTU 1460
TTL - 64
TCP Receive Window - 261280
MTU Discovery - Yes
Black Hole Detect - No
Selective Acks - Yes
Max Duplicate ACKs - 2
TCP 1323 Options:
Windows Scaling - checked
Timestamps - uncheck
Advanced Settings tab:
Max Connections per Server - 10
Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 20
LocalPriority - 1
Host Priority - 1
DNSPriority - 1
NetbtPriority - 1
Lan Browsing speedup - optimized
QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0
ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0
ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 80
MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0
NetFailureCacheTime - 0
NegativeSOACache Time - 0
LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768
Then select "Apply Changes" and reboot to take effect
Are you using a router? If so, log into your router and ensure MTU and MRU is set to 1492 (and MSS to 1452 if any) and save and reboot the router to take effect. After that, try the first TCP Optimizer settings again to see if MTU becomes 1492.
General Settings tab:
Custom settings - check
Modify All Network Adapters - check
network adapter selection - your NIC
MTU 1460
TTL - 64
TCP Receive Window - 261280
MTU Discovery - Yes
Black Hole Detect - No
Selective Acks - Yes
Max Duplicate ACKs - 2
TCP 1323 Options:
Windows Scaling - checked
Timestamps - uncheck
Advanced Settings tab:
Max Connections per Server - 10
Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 20
LocalPriority - 1
Host Priority - 1
DNSPriority - 1
NetbtPriority - 1
Lan Browsing speedup - optimized
QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0
ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0
ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 80
MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0
NetFailureCacheTime - 0
NegativeSOACache Time - 0
LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768
Then select "Apply Changes" and reboot to take effect
Are you using a router? If so, log into your router and ensure MTU and MRU is set to 1492 (and MSS to 1452 if any) and save and reboot the router to take effect. After that, try the first TCP Optimizer settings again to see if MTU becomes 1492.
-
PrivatePyle
- Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:33 pm
-
PrivatePyle
- Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:33 pm
Ok, this is before doing those suggestions to router, with the last settings you gave me.
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 10.12.2007 01:22
IP address: 81.179.xx.xx
TCP options string: 0204058c0103030201010402
MSS: 1420
MTU: 1460
TCP Window: 261280 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 2
Unscaled RWIN : 65320
Reccomended RWINs: 65320, 130640, 261280, 522560
BDP limit (200ms): 10451kbps (1306KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 4180kbps (523KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 43
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 10.12.2007 01:22
IP address: 81.179.xx.xx
TCP options string: 0204058c0103030201010402
MSS: 1420
MTU: 1460
TCP Window: 261280 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 2
Unscaled RWIN : 65320
Reccomended RWINs: 65320, 130640, 261280, 522560
BDP limit (200ms): 10451kbps (1306KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 4180kbps (523KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 43
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
Good. TCP Window follows the Analyzer's recommendation.PrivatePyle wrote:Ok, this is before doing those suggestions to router, with the last settings you gave me.
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 10.12.2007 01:22
IP address: 81.179.xx.xx
TCP options string: 0204058c0103030201010402
MSS: 1420
MTU: 1460
TCP Window: 261280 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 2
Unscaled RWIN : 65320
Reccomended RWINs: 65320, 130640, 261280, 522560
BDP limit (200ms): 10451kbps (1306KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 4180kbps (523KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 43
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
-
PrivatePyle
- Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:33 pm
This is after setting mtu to 1492 on router, no sign of mss setting, and no mention of it in routers manual.
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 10.12.2007 01:34
IP address: 81.179.xx.xx
TCP options string: 020405840103030201010402
MSS: 1412
MTU: 1452
TCP Window: 255572 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 2
Unscaled RWIN : 63893
Reccomended RWINs: 64952, 129904, 259808, 519616
BDP limit (200ms): 10223kbps (1278KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 4089kbps (511KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 41
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 01010000 (80)
Precedence: 010 (immediate)
Delay: 1 (low delay)
Throughput: 0 (normal throughput)
Reliability: 0 (normal reliability)
Cost: 0 (normal cost)
Check bit: 0 (correct)
DiffServ: AF22 010100 (20) - Assured Forwarding class 2, medium drop precedence (RFC 2597).
----------------------------
This stuff at the bottom I've never seen before.
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 10.12.2007 01:34
IP address: 81.179.xx.xx
TCP options string: 020405840103030201010402
MSS: 1412
MTU: 1452
TCP Window: 255572 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 2
Unscaled RWIN : 63893
Reccomended RWINs: 64952, 129904, 259808, 519616
BDP limit (200ms): 10223kbps (1278KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 4089kbps (511KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 41
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 01010000 (80)
Precedence: 010 (immediate)
Delay: 1 (low delay)
Throughput: 0 (normal throughput)
Reliability: 0 (normal reliability)
Cost: 0 (normal cost)
Check bit: 0 (correct)
DiffServ: AF22 010100 (20) - Assured Forwarding class 2, medium drop precedence (RFC 2597).
----------------------------
This stuff at the bottom I've never seen before.
MTU is lowered to 1452 and so TCP Window should follow at 259808.PrivatePyle wrote:This is after setting mtu to 1492 on router, no sign of mss setting, and no mention of it in routers manual.
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 10.12.2007 01:34
IP address: 81.179.xx.xx
TCP options string: 020405840103030201010402
MSS: 1412
MTU: 1452
TCP Window: 255572 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 2
Unscaled RWIN : 63893
Reccomended RWINs: 64952, 129904, 259808, 519616
BDP limit (200ms): 10223kbps (1278KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 4089kbps (511KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 41
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 01010000 (80)
Precedence: 010 (immediate)
Delay: 1 (low delay)
Throughput: 0 (normal throughput)
Reliability: 0 (normal reliability)
Cost: 0 (normal cost)
Check bit: 0 (correct)
DiffServ: AF22 010100 (20) - Assured Forwarding class 2, medium drop precedence (RFC 2597).
----------------------------
This stuff at the bottom I've never seen before.
My guess is that you have to update the firmware of your router to achieve MTU at 1492. Try searching Google for the latest version number.
-
PrivatePyle
- Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:33 pm
Try the following with TCP Optimizer:
General Settings tab:
Custom settings - check
Modify All Network Adapters - check
network adapter selection - your NIC
MTU 1452
TTL - 64
TCP Receive Window - 259808
MTU Discovery - Yes
Black Hole Detect - No
Selective Acks - Yes
Max Duplicate ACKs - 2
TCP 1323 Options:
Windows Scaling - checked
Timestamps - uncheck
Advanced Settings tab:
Max Connections per Server - 10
Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 20
LocalPriority - 1
Host Priority - 1
DNSPriority - 1
NetbtPriority - 1
Lan Browsing speedup - optimized
QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0
ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0
ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 80
MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0
NetFailureCacheTime - 0
NegativeSOACache Time - 0
LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768
Then select "Apply Changes" and reboot to take effect
After reboot, test speed at this link using a few nearby test servers:
http://www.speedtest.net/
General Settings tab:
Custom settings - check
Modify All Network Adapters - check
network adapter selection - your NIC
MTU 1452
TTL - 64
TCP Receive Window - 259808
MTU Discovery - Yes
Black Hole Detect - No
Selective Acks - Yes
Max Duplicate ACKs - 2
TCP 1323 Options:
Windows Scaling - checked
Timestamps - uncheck
Advanced Settings tab:
Max Connections per Server - 10
Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 20
LocalPriority - 1
Host Priority - 1
DNSPriority - 1
NetbtPriority - 1
Lan Browsing speedup - optimized
QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0
ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0
ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 80
MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0
NetFailureCacheTime - 0
NegativeSOACache Time - 0
LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768
Then select "Apply Changes" and reboot to take effect
After reboot, test speed at this link using a few nearby test servers:
http://www.speedtest.net/
-
PrivatePyle
- Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:33 pm



« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 10.12.2007 02:07
IP address: 81.179.xx.xx
TCP options string: 020405840103030201010402
MSS: 1412
MTU: 1452
TCP Window: 259808 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 2
Unscaled RWIN : 64952
Reccomended RWINs: 64952, 129904, 259808, 519616
BDP limit (200ms): 10392kbps (1299KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 4157kbps (520KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 41
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 01010000 (80)
Precedence: 010 (immediate)
Delay: 1 (low delay)
Throughput: 0 (normal throughput)
Reliability: 0 (normal reliability)
Cost: 0 (normal cost)
Check bit: 0 (correct)
DiffServ: AF22 010100 (20) - Assured Forwarding class 2, medium drop precedence (RFC 2597).
-
PrivatePyle
- Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:33 pm
-
PrivatePyle
- Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:33 pm
-
PrivatePyle
- Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:33 pm
-
PrivatePyle
- Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:33 pm
Well my ten days is up, and my bt speed tester results are still
When I phone today, if they suggest I spend another few days doing more speed tests, I'm going to unleash ten days worth of frustration at being lied to, as I've been telling them what the problem is already.
I've spent the last 5 days telling them this means I have a stuck bRAS profile at 2meg, and they said they wont do anything till after the ten days is finished.IP profile for your line is - 2000 kbps
DSL connection rate: 448 kbps(UP-STREAM) 7680 kbps(DOWN-STREAM)
Actual IP throughput achieved during the test was - 1807 kbps
When I phone today, if they suggest I spend another few days doing more speed tests, I'm going to unleash ten days worth of frustration at being lied to, as I've been telling them what the problem is already.