I have a Epia Mini-ITX system with on-board LAN which supports Wake-on-Lan, which works fine. However, this system has a Cardbus interface in which I use a D-Link Gigabit Ethernet PC Card (DGE-660TD), which unfortunately doesn't support Wake-on-Lan.
Can I possibly connect both Lan adapters to my Switch? I'm thinking I could use the Gigabit Cardbus for all my normal use, and the on-board Lan purely for the Wake-on-Lan feature? (Sorry if this is a datf idea!)
I am using Windows XP Pro on this machine.
Any help appreciated.
Dual Lan - Help Needed
Is there something that the onboard NIC doesn't do that you need from the cardbus adaptor?
If not, just stick with the one that does what you want.
If it's the 'gigabit' you want, it's pretty pointless unless you're LAN fully supports Gig-E end to end.
If not, just stick with the one that does what you want.
If it's the 'gigabit' you want, it's pretty pointless unless you're LAN fully supports Gig-E end to end.
Simply run adaware, spybot, ZoneAlarm, HijackThis, AVG, update windows daily, have a router, don't open e-mail, turn off action scripting, don't use P2P networks, don't violate EULAs, and wear a condom to get Windows secured.
People say Linux is alot of work!
People say Linux is alot of work!
Yes, I need the 'Gigabit' thing, and yes, my LAN does indeed support 'Gigabit' end to end.FunK wrote:Is there something that the onboard NIC doesn't do that you need from the cardbus adaptor?
If not, just stick with the one that does what you want.
If it's the 'gigabit' you want, it's pretty pointless unless you're LAN fully supports Gig-E end to end.
I think you should be able to connect the on-board NIC, give it a static IP address but no default gateway and you should be able to hit that interface to send the wake on command but not interfere with the rest of the operations of the system/network.
Edward Abbey wrote:A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.
Thanks Blisster. Someone else also suggested that so I will try it.Blisster wrote:I think you should be able to connect the on-board NIC, give it a static IP address but no default gateway and you should be able to hit that interface to send the wake on command but not interfere with the rest of the operations of the system/network.
If I connect the on-board Lan to the network and give it a Static IP address, will this have any impact on the PC's resources?
Lucky you!!milanlad wrote:Yes, I need the 'Gigabit' thing, and yes, my LAN does indeed support 'Gigabit' end to end.
As far as resources, I would think that one NIC, only used for Wake, wouldn't be much at all. Wouldn't even notice it..
Simply run adaware, spybot, ZoneAlarm, HijackThis, AVG, update windows daily, have a router, don't open e-mail, turn off action scripting, don't use P2P networks, don't violate EULAs, and wear a condom to get Windows secured.
People say Linux is alot of work!
People say Linux is alot of work!
- YeOldeStonecat
- SG VIP
- Posts: 51171
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
- Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England
Yes it will use up some more resources versus having just one NIC. Multi-homed rigs will take a bit longer to boot...since you're loading up another set of drivers, protocol(s) for that NIC, any services you have bound to that NIC....and services dependent on those.milanlad wrote:If I connect the on-board Lan to the network and give it a Static IP address, will this have any impact on the PC's resources?
Speaking of services, you'll probably want to unbind the server and workstation services from that NIC (I don't think wake need that)...else you'll have duplicate broadcasting on the same network....not a good thing.
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
Guinness for Strength!!!