Glad to see

cybotron r_9 · Post by **cybotron r_9** » Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:42 pm

that some Blacks still have a sense of humor.

In the storm's aftermath, the Rev. Jesse Jackson and Rep. Maxine Waters, California Democrat, charged that relocating evacuees across the country was "racist" and designed to move black people, who overwhelmingly vote Democratic, out of Louisiana.

*some of the wording was changed by the SG staff. Please be a bit more respectful*

Prey521 · Post by **Prey521** » Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:47 pm

Jesse Jackson and Sharpton need to end themselves.

thepieman · Post by **thepieman** » Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:51 pm

cybotron r_9 wrote:that some Blacks still have a sense of humor.

In the storm's aftermath, the Rev. Jesse Jackson and Rep. Maxine Waters, California Democrat, charged that relocating evacuees across the country was "racist" and designed to move black people, who overwhelmingly vote Democratic, out of Louisiana.

I believe it. Why they made them move from Texas is beyond comprehension. With so many open space bordering states I find it so friggin unbelieveable.
They knew damn well they would not be able to afford to come back from so far a distance.

thepieman · Post by **thepieman** » Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:55 pm

Prey521 wrote:Jesse Jackson and Sharpton need to end themselves.

They may not be right a lot of the times, but in this case it all makes sense.
Instead of fixing up the town for the people who inhabitated it before its gonna be fixed up for the Hotels, Bars, Casinos and Developers.
Why would you guys back this sort of thing?

Mr. Jackson, a former developer and longtime government housing official, said the history of urban reconstruction projects shows that most blacks will not return and others who want to might not have the means or opportunity. His agency will play a critical role in the city's redevelopment through various grant programs, including those for damaged or destroyed properties.

A DUHHHH You just moved them 3000 miles away!!!!!!!

major marco · Post by **major marco** » Sun Oct 02, 2005 10:04 pm

thepieman wrote:I believe it. Why they made them move from Texas is beyond comprehension. With so many open space bordering states I find it so friggin unbelieveable.
They knew damn well they would not be able to afford to come back from so far a distance.

Also, Greece donated luxury liners to house the refugees and FEMA turned them down. Why? Bu$h could have also used housing specifically built to temporarily house the refugees but FEMA has placed just 109 La. families. Why?

Might evacuating the brown people from NOLA be an added bonus for Team Bu$hCo? Think about all the primo land that is now available in the city that is just ripe for overpriced condos now that all the darkies are gone.

Prey521 · Post by **Prey521** » Sun Oct 02, 2005 10:07 pm

LMAO, marco, the more I read your posts, the more I realize that you have major issues!!

major marco · Post by **major marco** » Sun Oct 02, 2005 10:18 pm

Prey521 wrote:LMAO, marco, the more I read your posts, the more I realize that you have major issues!!

You laugh hysterically about death & catastrophe but I'm the one with "issues." You know there's meds for that, dude. You should start with Thorazine.

Prey521 · Post by **Prey521** » Sun Oct 02, 2005 10:19 pm

major marco wrote:You laugh hysterically about death & catastrophe but I'm the one with "issues." You know there's meds for that, dude. You should start with Thorazine.

ROOFLES!!!!

cybotron r_9 · Post by **cybotron r_9** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 4:26 pm

*some of the wording was changed by the SG staff. Please be a bit more respectful*

you're kidding right?

note to SG staff....better let

these folks

know to be more respectful.

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 4:30 pm

cybotron r_9 wrote:

you're kidding right?

note to SG staff....better let

these folks

know to be more respectful.

Point taken. We'll get right on it and ask them to change their name.

I realize that you seem to take these things as a personal affront but believe me it isn't an attack on you per say as to some of the things that go on here. This site takes on all walks of life. We need to moderate some things that others might take offense too.

Soooo...

Could you take it up with Ken and Philip?

Personally I think you posted it that way to stir the pot.

Brk · Post by **Brk** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 4:52 pm

downhill wrote: Personally I think you posted it that way to stir the pot.

Of course, because you're clairvoyant enough to discern the original intent.

- Burke, the only person to not try and deflect the true nature of my statement with a lame smilie.

Prey521 · Post by **Prey521** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 4:53 pm

Burke wrote:- Burke, the only person to not try and deflect the true nature of my statement with a lame smilie.

ROOFLES!!!

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 4:59 pm

Burke wrote:Of course, because you're clairvoyant enough to discern the original intent.

- Burke, the only person to not try and deflect the true nature of my statement with a lame smilie.

Welcome back! I see things have charged dramatically with you!!

Thanks for the kind words! I wasn't expecting that.

Sorry Burke, but as far as I'm concerned, when I see a post like that, I have two options. Move it and send the poster a PM, or edit it as the original thread has at least some material to discuss. In this case, moving it would be lame...

At anyrate, it's still up to the staff what stays or goes.

Take complaints to Ken or Philp.

Spammy · Post by **Spammy** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 5:00 pm

Burke wrote:Of course, because you're clairvoyant enough to discern the original intent.

- Burke, the only person to not try and deflect the true nature of my statement with a lame smilie.

Oh Great more Downhill bashing

Brk · Post by **Brk** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 5:27 pm

downhill wrote:Welcome back! I see things have charged dramatically with you!!

Thanks for the kind words! I wasn't expecting that.

Sorry Burke, but as far as I'm concerned, when I see a post like that, I have two options. Move it and send the poster a PM, or edit it as the original thread has at least some material to discuss. In this case, moving it would be lame...

At anyrate, it's still up to the staff what stays or goes.

Take complaints to Ken or Philp.

No complaints, I was just making a statement. I've always enjoyed the status quo here at SG.

cybotron r_9 · Post by **cybotron r_9** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 5:37 pm

Point taken. We'll get right on it and ask them to change their name.

We need to moderate some things that others might take offense too.

BS....now you are the KiNg.

Could you take it up with Ken and Philip?

Personally I think you posted it that way to stir the pot.