Star Wars Battlefront
Star Wars Battlefront
Is there an interest in this title among SG'ers? I'm probably going to be checking this one out, but if it's just Evan and myself who are interested in it, I'll probably just get the XBOX version...
- YARDofSTUF
- Posts: 70006
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 12:00 am
- Location: USA
- YeOldeStonecat
- SG VIP
- Posts: 51171
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
- Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England
- Joint Chiefs of Staff
- Posts: 42832
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: The Sandbox
- RoscoPColtrane
- Posts: 6153
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 12:00 pm
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
i heard that the battles dont' support as many people ad does BF...
i will probobly still pick it up tho!
i will probobly still pick it up tho!
****************************************************************************************
Abit NF7-S 2.0, Barton 2500+ @ 2.2 Ghz, 2 Gig ddr3200, 80gig Seagate HDD, ATI x850 PRO @ 550/600, WinXP Pro
J B K M
Pittsburgh Steelers Super Bowl XL Champions!!!!!
Abit NF7-S 2.0, Barton 2500+ @ 2.2 Ghz, 2 Gig ddr3200, 80gig Seagate HDD, ATI x850 PRO @ 550/600, WinXP Pro
J B K M
Pittsburgh Steelers Super Bowl XL Champions!!!!!
- Joint Chiefs of Staff
- Posts: 42832
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: The Sandbox
- RoscoPColtrane
- Posts: 6153
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 12:00 pm
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Yup i saw in a magazine it was only 16 players max....Im hoping thats just for the xbox tho. I also heard some details about how other battles may effect other battles! Pretty wild idea there if you ask me! They should make it where you conquest the whole galaxie...if you win a battle once then you have to defend it later if hte other side decides to take it back or something...maybe kinda add some story or something...Joint Chiefs of Staff wrote:This better be a rumor or else I'm heading out to jack slap the game designers.![]()
****************************************************************************************
Abit NF7-S 2.0, Barton 2500+ @ 2.2 Ghz, 2 Gig ddr3200, 80gig Seagate HDD, ATI x850 PRO @ 550/600, WinXP Pro
J B K M
Pittsburgh Steelers Super Bowl XL Champions!!!!!
Abit NF7-S 2.0, Barton 2500+ @ 2.2 Ghz, 2 Gig ddr3200, 80gig Seagate HDD, ATI x850 PRO @ 550/600, WinXP Pro
J B K M
Pittsburgh Steelers Super Bowl XL Champions!!!!!
- YARDofSTUF
- Posts: 70006
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 12:00 am
- Location: USA
From LucasArts.com:
"Multiplayer for up to 16 players (plus AI units) online."
http://www.lucasarts.com/games/swbattlefront/
"Multiplayer for up to 16 players (plus AI units) online."
http://www.lucasarts.com/games/swbattlefront/
- Joint Chiefs of Staff
- Posts: 42832
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: The Sandbox
Damn the AI units.YARDofSTUF wrote:From LucasArts.com:
"Multiplayer for up to 16 players (plus AI units) online."
http://www.lucasarts.com/games/swbattlefront/
- RoscoPColtrane
- Posts: 6153
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 12:00 pm
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
UOD wrote:NEGATIVE!!!!!
PC will support 64 players online with dedicated servers.
hell yeah !
man i can' wait to pilot and at-at!!
****************************************************************************************
Abit NF7-S 2.0, Barton 2500+ @ 2.2 Ghz, 2 Gig ddr3200, 80gig Seagate HDD, ATI x850 PRO @ 550/600, WinXP Pro
J B K M
Pittsburgh Steelers Super Bowl XL Champions!!!!!
Abit NF7-S 2.0, Barton 2500+ @ 2.2 Ghz, 2 Gig ddr3200, 80gig Seagate HDD, ATI x850 PRO @ 550/600, WinXP Pro
J B K M
Pittsburgh Steelers Super Bowl XL Champions!!!!!
-
Ghosthunter
- SG VIP
- Posts: 18183
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2001 12:00 pm
This is a new game and new engine by Lucasarts and Pandemic. No BF or BFV for this puppy.ScottE wrote:What engine is this based off of?
The old '42 engine or BFV?
Wasn't BFV supposed to have the previous rounds battles affect the new one too? So far I haven't seen this.
That being said I might check this out.
[quote="UOD"]This is a new game and new engine by Lucasarts and Pandemic. No BF or BFV for this puppy. ]
Probably uses a similar graphics engine to what they used with that one X-Box game. Full Spectrum Warrior. Pandemic is pretty good though. I'll more than likely pick this game up. Finding time to play it is a different matter.
Probably uses a similar graphics engine to what they used with that one X-Box game. Full Spectrum Warrior. Pandemic is pretty good though. I'll more than likely pick this game up. Finding time to play it is a different matter.
Respect it.
ScottE wrote:Probably uses a similar graphics engine to what they used with that one X-Box game. Full Spectrum Warrior. Pandemic is pretty good though. I'll more than likely pick this game up. Finding time to play it is a different matter.![]()
I dunno about that. This game offers both first & third person perspectives. Lucasarts has been testing the game loading it with 1,000 bots....should play fine on our server.
- Joint Chiefs of Staff
- Posts: 42832
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: The Sandbox
-
Ghosthunter
- SG VIP
- Posts: 18183
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2001 12:00 pm
-
Ghosthunter
- SG VIP
- Posts: 18183
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2001 12:00 pm
UOD wrote:I dunno about that. This game offers both first & third person perspectives. Lucasarts has been testing the game loading it with 1,000 bots....should play fine on our server.![]()
Man in FPS games I just can't get into that 3rd person view. I think it sucks. Makes it hard to play for me.
1,000 bots would be insane. The maps would have to be huge for that to work. Chrimeny. You'd need like 2 gigs of ram just to play.
Respect it.