How does this look?

Get help and discuss anything related to tweaking your internet connection, as well as the different tools and registry patches on the site. TCP Optimizer settings and Analyzer results should be posted here.
Post Reply
Gibbs
Regular Member
Posts: 115
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 11:57 am
Location: Phoenix Az

How does this look?

Post by Gibbs »

TCP properties for IP = 68.x.xx.xxx ()
Browser/OS = Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)


TCP options string = 020405b40103030201010402
MTU = 1500
MTU is fully optimized for broadband.
MSS = 1460
Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS.

Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 256960
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 2 bits
Unscaled Receive Window = 64240

RWIN is a multiple of MSS
Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)
128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
64240 (MSS x 44)
bandwidth * delay product:

Your RcvWindow limits you to: 10278.4 kbps (1284.8 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 4111.36 kbps (513.92 KBytes/s) @ 500ms
MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON
Time to live left = 52 hops

TTL value is ok.
Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF
Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON
IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000


On a Motorola Surfboard Modem , soon to be hooked up to a Linksys BEFSR41 Router. My ISP Is Cox. I moved and i was wondering if it got any better...Its pretty fast but i wish i could just push it a little more. Im running Windows XP Pro. My Average download on ftp://ftp1.optonline.net/pub/test64 was 344
User avatar
mnosteele52
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Chesapeake, VA

Post by mnosteele52 »

For Cox use the following settings in CableNut:

DefaultReceiveWindow = 384000
DefaultSendWindow = 32768
DisableAddressSharing = 1
InitialLargeBufferCount = 200
InitialMediumBufferCount = 480
InitialSmallBufferCount = 640
LargeBufferSize = 819200
MaxFastTransmit = 64000
MediumBufferSize = 150400
PriorityBoost = 0
SmallBufferSize = 12800
TransmitWorker = 32
FastSendDatagramThreshold = 4096
EnableFastRouteLookup = 1
EnablePMTUDiscovery = 1
IgnorePushBitsOnReceive = 0
GlobalMaxTcpWindowSize = 37960 or 64240
MaxFreeTcbs = 8000
MaxHashTableSize = 16384
MaxNormLookupMemory = 5000000
SackOpts = 1
SynAttackProtect = 1
Tcp1323Opts = 0
TcpLogLevel = 1
TcpMaxDupAcks = 3
TcpMaxHalfOpen = 100
TcpMaxHalfRetried = 80
TcpRecvSegmentSize = 1460
TcpSendSegmentSize = 1460
TcpTimedWaitDelay = 30
TcpUseRFC1122UrgentPointer = 0
TcpWindowSize = 37960 or 64240
MaxConnectionsPer1_0Server = 20
MaxConnectionsPerServer = 10
DefaultTTL = 64
DisableUserTOSSetting = 0
TcpMaxDataRetransmissions = 6
DefaultTOSValue = 240


:cool:
Gibbs
Regular Member
Posts: 115
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 11:57 am
Location: Phoenix Az

Post by Gibbs »

thank ya much..bout ready to put them in
Gibbs
Regular Member
Posts: 115
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 11:57 am
Location: Phoenix Az

Post by Gibbs »

TCP properties for IP = 68.x.xx.xxx ()
Browser/OS = Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)
Notes: Read the Analyzer FAQ if the above is not your IP address.

TCP options string = 020405b401010402
MTU = 1500
MTU is fully optimized for broadband.
MSS = 1460
Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS.

Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 64240
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits
Unscaled Receive Window = 64240

RWIN is a multiple of MSS
Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)
256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
bandwidth * delay product:

Your RcvWindow limits you to: 2569.6 kbps (321.2 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 1027.84 kbps (128.48 KBytes/s) @ 500ms
MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON
Time to live left = 52 hops

TTL value is ok.
Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF
Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON
IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000000
User avatar
j79zlr
Regular Member
Posts: 242
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 3:31 am

Post by j79zlr »

looks good, how is the speed?
Gibbs
Regular Member
Posts: 115
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 11:57 am
Location: Phoenix Az

Post by Gibbs »

seems good =] , breaking 3 mb easy
User avatar
mnosteele52
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Chesapeake, VA

Post by mnosteele52 »

Originally posted by Gibbs
seems good =] , breaking 3 mb easy


AWESOME :cool:
Gibbs
Regular Member
Posts: 115
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 11:57 am
Location: Phoenix Az

Post by Gibbs »

Image

Pretty sexy eh steele?

sorry its small..download and check it out on desktop

EDIT: Sorry..pretty crappy , it says 4.417 MB/S

Gotta love cox sometimes
User avatar
Maxxi
Regular Member
Posts: 110
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2001 8:50 pm
Location: The Big Apple

Post by Maxxi »

Very nice numbers Gibbs. This is what I've got on TWC RR (Roadrunner @ 2000/384):

File Size: 2.9297 MB
Time Elapsed: 8.484 seconds
2.763 Mbps
(353.61 KBps)

http://promos.mcafee.com/speedometer/
Gibbs
Regular Member
Posts: 115
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 11:57 am
Location: Phoenix Az

Post by Gibbs »

hahahhahahah check out this bad boy!

Image

Try this link..
SPEED!!
User avatar
Maxxi
Regular Member
Posts: 110
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2001 8:50 pm
Location: The Big Apple

Post by Maxxi »

Good one Gibbs. Looks fake (someone's got a wonderful cache) besides such speeds are rarely needed given today's standards and what people do on the net (sure downloading ISO images, DivX/Xvid/vob movies, etc. would be easier if the given end server actually provided such bandwidth).
Gibbs
Regular Member
Posts: 115
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 11:57 am
Location: Phoenix Az

Post by Gibbs »

i refreshed it and ti was there..i was like whoa....
User avatar
Maxxi
Regular Member
Posts: 110
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2001 8:50 pm
Location: The Big Apple

Post by Maxxi »

Originally posted by Gibbs
i refreshed it and ti was there..i was like whoa....


My point exactly - nevertheless with 4.417 Mbps you can't complain. Anything over 1-2 Mbps is great, anything above 3-4Mbps is wonderful and 5-10Mbps is simply awesome (especially if the upload figures are up to par - say at least: 512-1024Kbps). Good luck and enjoy your speeds.
User avatar
mnosteele52
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Chesapeake, VA

Post by mnosteele52 »

A VERY innaccurate test, your caps are 3000. Just use the FTP tests.

:cool:
Post Reply