It was the best thread of the night.....
Cyber-Sex Zapped???
Cyber-Sex Zapped???
What happened?
It was the best thread of the night.....
It was the best thread of the night.....
Re: Cyber-Sex Zapped???
Originally posted by axtrader
What happened?
It was the best thread of the night.....
It was a repost and it was deleted the first time it was posted by Chris I believe. What did you expect?
Respect it.
-
Immortal
- Posts: 22674
- Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2000 12:00 pm
- Location: Mississauga, Ontario , Canada. Behaviour : Good
Re: Re: Cyber-Sex Zapped???
Originally posted by agentbeast
It was a repost and it was deleted the first time it was posted by Chris I believe. What did you expect?
A hug from agent?
Re: Re: Re: Cyber-Sex Zapped???
Originally posted by Immortal
A hug from agent?
It was that same story with the Geek and that Woman having cybersex and in the end the Geek sets the Carpet or the curtains on fire.
But if it's a hug yer after sure I'll oblige.
Respect it.
Is that the same where he pissed her off cause he wasn't taking her serious and kept goofing off??
"There is a big difference between breaking the law and having a law designed to break you. We will not be broken." -- Jinny Simms
"On the street everything is legal! I don't believe in an eye for an eye, I believe in 2 eyes for an eye." -- Bas Rutten
"On the street everything is legal! I don't believe in an eye for an eye, I believe in 2 eyes for an eye." -- Bas Rutten
-
Brandon_k_W
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 11:42 pm
- Location: Sacramento, California
Umm...well to tell you all the truth, it wasn't removed because it was a repost...........
And to be sure, it was in a grey area as to if it met SG's PG13 guidelines.......and the others were also removed, I believe..
A judgement call......
And to be sure, it was in a grey area as to if it met SG's PG13 guidelines.......and the others were also removed, I believe..
A judgement call......
The tools of conquest do not necessarily come with bombs and explosions and fallout. There are weapons that are simply thoughts, attitudes, and prejudices to be found only in the minds of men. For the record, prejudices can kill and suspicion can destroy and a thoughtless, frightened search for a scapegoat has a fallout all of its own for the children and the children yet unborn and the pity of it is that these things cannot be confined to the Twilight Zone.
for compliance sake I have a question.....
If it is not of good enough nature to be suitable for SG (PG-13) is a link OK? Say I have some pics of topless chicks and I want to share but I just post a link to them and it is not on SG is that breaking the rules? It is not coming via the SG server it is coming from outside the SG realm and just linked.
What do ya say?
-lance
If it is not of good enough nature to be suitable for SG (PG-13) is a link OK? Say I have some pics of topless chicks and I want to share but I just post a link to them and it is not on SG is that breaking the rules? It is not coming via the SG server it is coming from outside the SG realm and just linked.
What do ya say?
-lance
A mistake does not become an error until one refuses to correct it
Folding for the future
Folding for the future
Originally posted by lance
for compliance sake I have a question.....
If it is not of good enough nature to be suitable for SG (PG-13) is a link OK? Say I have some pics of topless chicks and I want to share but I just post a link to them and it is not on SG is that breaking the rules? It is not coming via the SG server it is coming from outside the SG realm and just linked.
What do ya say?
-lance
What wouild be the difference? It's either a PG13 site or it isn't.
The tools of conquest do not necessarily come with bombs and explosions and fallout. There are weapons that are simply thoughts, attitudes, and prejudices to be found only in the minds of men. For the record, prejudices can kill and suspicion can destroy and a thoughtless, frightened search for a scapegoat has a fallout all of its own for the children and the children yet unborn and the pity of it is that these things cannot be confined to the Twilight Zone.
Originally posted by downhill
What wouild be the difference? It's either a PG13 site or it isn't.
The difference is that it is not directly on SG. It is hosted elsewhere and at that following any link can take you to see a number of different things. Say the pictures on CNN of Saddam's sons. Was that PG-13? Seemed to be a little big graphic to me. Is any kind of killing/murder PG-13? I am just asking if it is considered that way. I have no pictures to post however, it does seem as though certain things are allowed to pass and others aren't when in fact none of it is PG-13.
-lance
A mistake does not become an error until one refuses to correct it
Folding for the future
Folding for the future
Although not really posted in detail in the Rules PG 13 isn't that hard to figure.
I kinda go by what Ken suggested a long time ago. If it's something that I think I would feel uncomfortable have a 13 year old girl, view.....then it's either over the edge or boderline.
Again and I can't figure out why anyone has a problem with this.
1.This is first off, a tech site. As such, there are professionals that use it for information. We would like to keep it that way.
2. There are plenty of sites that allow you a basic "post what you will" type of forum. Some of you already visit them.
Now in saying that, Philip is really pretty generous with what he does allow here. Be gracious enough to accept that and understand that anyone can play here for free.....
Now.....just for those who prefer to not look at the rules....from the bottom....
Disclaimers
SpeedGuide.net owners and its representatives reserve the rights to close any thread, edit, reprint, distribute, or delete any post for any reason and without prior notification or explanation to the author. All posted messages become the property of SpeedGuide.net.
Non-compliance with any of the above rules will be grounds for immediate removal of your posts, or posting privileges at our sole discretion.
By the way, this isn't a paying job. We (the staff) do this because we love this place.
Lance, there is a difference. Anytime we get someone posting links to porn....the mods get a slew of email. If the link goes to say......AMD's site...we never get a one. What would that indicate to you? To me, it indicates that there are a lot of folk who agree with how things are handled here.
Of course there are dissenting opinions and the fact that they are allowed to post them, also indicates Philip's generosity.
I kinda go by what Ken suggested a long time ago. If it's something that I think I would feel uncomfortable have a 13 year old girl, view.....then it's either over the edge or boderline.
Again and I can't figure out why anyone has a problem with this.
1.This is first off, a tech site. As such, there are professionals that use it for information. We would like to keep it that way.
2. There are plenty of sites that allow you a basic "post what you will" type of forum. Some of you already visit them.
Now in saying that, Philip is really pretty generous with what he does allow here. Be gracious enough to accept that and understand that anyone can play here for free.....
Now.....just for those who prefer to not look at the rules....from the bottom....
Disclaimers
SpeedGuide.net owners and its representatives reserve the rights to close any thread, edit, reprint, distribute, or delete any post for any reason and without prior notification or explanation to the author. All posted messages become the property of SpeedGuide.net.
Non-compliance with any of the above rules will be grounds for immediate removal of your posts, or posting privileges at our sole discretion.
By the way, this isn't a paying job. We (the staff) do this because we love this place.
Lance, there is a difference. Anytime we get someone posting links to porn....the mods get a slew of email. If the link goes to say......AMD's site...we never get a one. What would that indicate to you? To me, it indicates that there are a lot of folk who agree with how things are handled here.
Of course there are dissenting opinions and the fact that they are allowed to post them, also indicates Philip's generosity.
The tools of conquest do not necessarily come with bombs and explosions and fallout. There are weapons that are simply thoughts, attitudes, and prejudices to be found only in the minds of men. For the record, prejudices can kill and suspicion can destroy and a thoughtless, frightened search for a scapegoat has a fallout all of its own for the children and the children yet unborn and the pity of it is that these things cannot be confined to the Twilight Zone.
Those who would like the story... PM me.
It was my post... and it was a little over the line.
I have no problem at all with it being removed.
Like I say... PM me if you want to take a look at it.
It was my post... and it was a little over the line.
I have no problem at all with it being removed.
Like I say... PM me if you want to take a look at it.
People will forget what you said... and people will forget what you did... but people will never forget how you made them feel.
Can anyone read here anymore? Seriously? I said that the story was a repost and it was removed (deleted) the first time it was posted because of questionable content. Then somehow the thread goes off on a tangent and people starts talking about how reposts should not be deleted. WTF? Where the hell did this come from? And what do reposts have to do with anything?
Now in reguards to what was posted in the thread in question.
The first thread posted about 2 weeks ago was deleted because it violated the PG-13 Rule, and so was the thread in question here. Deal with it.
Now in reguards to what was posted in the thread in question.
The first thread posted about 2 weeks ago was deleted because it violated the PG-13 Rule, and so was the thread in question here. Deal with it.
Respect it.
heh seems like everyone is getting a little uptight over my question. Well, just to put everyone at ease, I am not trying to defy or challenge the authority here at SG. I am just asking the question so that it has been asked and answered.
Consider it this way. If I were to now go and post something that was wrong (ie. porn) I should probably suffer some severe consiquences. I have asked the question and it was fully answered.
I guess it is just my nature to look for potential loop-holes and identify them. With that being said, the rules have now been clearly defined in regards to this.
Thank you for the clarification
-lance
Consider it this way. If I were to now go and post something that was wrong (ie. porn) I should probably suffer some severe consiquences. I have asked the question and it was fully answered.
I guess it is just my nature to look for potential loop-holes and identify them. With that being said, the rules have now been clearly defined in regards to this.
Thank you for the clarification
-lance
A mistake does not become an error until one refuses to correct it
Folding for the future
Folding for the future
Lance, the pictures of Sadam's sons were asked about before they were posted. John said that if they publicly posted those images on the news, that it would be allowed here. Grant you, those pictures were disturbing to some, but the point is that approval was granted before the posting of the pictures, otherwise they would not have been here at all.Originally posted by lance
The difference is that it is not directly on SG. It is hosted elsewhere and at that following any link can take you to see a number of different things. Say the pictures on CNN of Saddam's sons. Was that PG-13? Seemed to be a little big graphic to me. Is any kind of killing/murder PG-13? I am just asking if it is considered that way. I have no pictures to post however, it does seem as though certain things are allowed to pass and others aren't when in fact none of it is PG-13.
-lance
I'm not trying to add fuel to a fire here, only tell it like it is.
don't worry blebbs99 there is no fire. I am not disgruntled in any form. I may have ruffled someones tail feathers unintentionally by asking the question but, I have explained that it was not my intention to upset anyone. Just wanted clarification.
-lance
-lance
A mistake does not become an error until one refuses to correct it
Folding for the future
Folding for the future
-
General_Jack_As
- Posts: 885
- Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 12:00 pm
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Originally posted by blebs99
Lance, the pictures of Sadam's sons were asked about before they were posted. John said that if they publicly posted those images on the news, that it would be allowed here. Grant you, those pictures were disturbing to some, but the point is that approval was granted before the posting of the pictures, otherwise they would not have been here at all.
I'm not trying to add fuel to a fire here, only tell it like it is.
And because they were on the news that makes them PG13????? Our local news channel would Not show those pics and I agree they are definitely NOT PG13...as I said before its all in whose interpretation we are going by today. So Don't say read the rules...Everyone can interpret them differently..A clarification was called for and rightly so...Now we All know.
Originally posted by General_Jack_As
What if lance were to posta link and say something to the affect
*NOTE: Probably not work appropriate or PG-13, Viewer Discretion is advised*
[link to lance's topless mom]
Is that ok or no?
No, direct links to PG-13 (Mainly Pornographic) Material on the forums are not appropriate and have been deleted or edited out in the past at the mods discresion. However something like.
"Lance's topless mom" PM me for a link. Would be acceptable. And it has been done in the past most recently with the Naked Cartoon "Nvidia Girl"
Respect it.
Those pictures would NOT have been allowed had it not been pre-approved. I agree that they were not in the best interest nor were PG-13. It was a judgement call, just like the news channels around my house. Some had no problem showing them, some did and wouldn't. It's a fine line with rules sometimes, but when in doubt ask the admin or moderators for clarification BEFORE posting possible objectionable material. 
Originally posted by blebs99
Those pictures would NOT have been allowed had it not been pre-approved. I agree that they were not in the best interest nor were PG-13. It was a judgement call, just like the news channels around my house. Some had no problem showing them, some did and wouldn't. It's a fine line with rules sometimes, but when in doubt ask the admin or moderators for clarification BEFORE posting possible objectionable material.
Well Said...I Agree
