


brembo wrote:"This is a stick-up...I have an armadillo in my pants"
Meggie wrote:i think its ok as long as its not kids. unfortunautly prostitution usually is accompanied with drug addiction, and the 2 combined usually are breeding grounds for pretty hardcore diseases.
but if you just mean prostitution as a honest occupation of sex for money. i say hey sure whatever works, i personally would never do it. but i wouldnt ever strip for money either.
as long as its safe, and regulated im all for it. i dont think it exists because of gender equality nor do i believe its a step in the right direction for womens rights. I think its one of those things that have always existed and always will exist regardless of whether or not we want to recognize it.
F***! I could see why. Sorry man.morbidpete wrote:i'm persoanly against it in every shape and form..i still remeber when i was like 5 and up roamingthe streets wiht my mother and waiting somewere for her to come back..back then..i had to clue what was going on...now that im older i am fully aware...
so my stand is no...
SG Theme SongThe Devil wrote:Tolerance is a virtue, not a requirement.
Your just a tightwad....lmaoPrey521 wrote:No, it's disgusting.
SG Theme SongThe Devil wrote:Tolerance is a virtue, not a requirement.
Droolin over girls and my opinion on prostitution are 2 totally different things. I know I am not being forced to "go" with a prostitute, the fact that the "job" is disgusting is my opinion, and it should in no way be made legal.Ghosthunter wrote:For you it is...but who forcing you to go?
but you dont mind drooling over hot girls on the net...LOL!!
Prey521 wrote:Droolin over girls and my opinion on prostitution are 2 totally different things. I know I am not being forced to "go" with a prostitute, the fact that the "job" is disgusting is my opinion, and it should in no way be made legal.
GH, opinions are like a$$holes, everybody has them, it's my opinion and I have every right to feel like I do, who said that I am trying to force it on anyone? I don't believe that it should be legal, if it's made legal, then so be it, if a women/man is low enough to sleep with someone else for money, then that is on them. And WTF does this have to do with lookin at girls anyways?Ghosthunter wrote:according to the bible "droolin over girls" = lust...and they are all sins..and sins are equal
anyway...just because you think it is disgusting does not meant it should not be legal. Whatever happened to freedom? Freedom to choose? In reality who is it hurting? In fact it will probably save more lives then anything.
Truth is we all pay for sex in some form or another..LOL
Prey521 wrote:GH, opinions are like a$$holes, everybody has them, it's my opinion and I have every right to feel like I do, who said that I am trying to force it on anyone? I don't believe that it should be legal, if it's made legal, then so be it, if a women/man is low enough to sleep with someone else for money, then that is on them. And WTF does this have to do with lookin at girls anyways?
LMMFAO, you're so predictable it's not even funny GH, your arguements never change, you need something new other than "lookin at girls on the web is a sin", you need a new line. The fact that you're comparing lookin @ women, to prostitution, warrants me ignoring any other posts of yours in this thread.Ghosthunter wrote:i love the hypocrisy....typical
EternalDiatribe:
The problem with prostitution is not a moral one, but rather a societal one..it demonstrates that a society is willing to allow the worst form of non-war human degradation, the selling of one's body for money.
Glad your not a politician here in NevadaPrey521 wrote:GH, opinions are like a$$holes, everybody has them, it's my opinion and I have every right to feel like I do, who said that I am trying to force it on anyone? I don't believe that it should be legal, if it's made legal, then so be it, if a women/man is low enough to sleep with someone else for money, then that is on them.
Sid wrote:Its legal in most counties here![]()
Well for us here in Nevada its like a tourist attraction but yes, I have to agree with you. It's like trying to stop the U.S. from getting and smoking pot, it just isn't going to happen. Legalize it and make them pay taxes!Ghosthunter wrote:I actually laugh how NY/NJ waste so much taxpayer money trying to close down escort services and brothels...when there are real serious crimes that could be better use...meanwhile the politicians here are all against it...but so many politicians use the services anyway...LOL
i dont even get free health care....Sarahnn wrote:Regulated prostitution at commercial locations. No pimps, free health care, paid vacations, and the women treated like employees with all the inherent rights.
If you go into prostitution alone, you report your income and pay taxes like the rest of us and are required to update your health certificate or be closed down like any other establishment.
Ho'in and Piimp'in is a sub culture that is dangerous to communities because of other criminal activities it draws.
brembo wrote:"This is a stick-up...I have an armadillo in my pants"
Murder for hire is also an old profession as is politics.Sarahnn wrote:Prey, I totally respect your opinion so please don't take these questions as a challenge.
Isn't pornography a form of prostituting ones body for voyeurism to make a profit?
If a woman has pictures taken of herself in compromising positions without the penetration of another person and she is highly paid, is this not another form of prostituting her body for profit? Or is the fact that one can only watch her pose less disgusting than engaging in the act for the same purpose of sexual arousal?
I only advocate the legalization of prostitution to keep women safe, because it is the worlds oldest profession.