Here, I'll post something inconsequential, unprovocative, and spammish, too...

Izzo · Post by **Izzo** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:49 pm

YARDofSTUF wrote:Apparently debbie does discriminate cuz Burke got infractions for the ass pic and thats no worse than others that have been posted in the past.

lame

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:50 pm

Debbie wrote:I'll stay out of your crappy give back threads. If what you post is beyond PG13 and it gets pulled, don't blame it on me.

I dont post images beyond a PG13 rating and the one in this thread wasnt either.

Debbie · Post by **Debbie** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:51 pm

YARDofSTUF wrote:No i'm not kidding apparently following the forum gidelines of posting PG13 images isnt enough, if we want to post them in any thread we want we seem to need debbie's approval.

If Philip approved, he would have not pulled the pic.

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:52 pm

Debbie wrote:If Philip approved, he would have not pulled the pic.

Again I would throw that up to member bias.

EDIT: I think you were jsut pissy cuz you views the pic on your work PC and the thread didnt have a NWS tag.

Spammy · Post by **Spammy** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:53 pm

YARDofSTUF wrote:No i'm not kidding apparently following the forum gidelines of posting PG13 images isnt enough, if we want to post them in any thread we want we seem to need debbie's approval.

I think the pic was fine. I came twice already.
I'm confused

Debbie · Post by **Debbie** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:54 pm

Call it what you want...............I'm out of here.

jeremyboycool · Post by **jeremyboycool** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:54 pm

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:55 pm

Debbie wrote:Call it what you want...............I'm out of here.

I figured that, you hardly ever hang around to explain yourself or anything like that.

Debbie · Post by **Debbie** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:57 pm

YARDofSTUF wrote:I figured that, you hardly ever hang around to explain yourself or anything like that.

Not justifying myself to you.

or anyone else for that matter.

Brent · Post by **Brent** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:58 pm

opcorn:

jeremyboycool · Post by **jeremyboycool** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:59 pm

This is a sign

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:59 pm

Debbie wrote:Not justifying myself to you. or anyone else for that matter.

Repost.

Debbie · Post by **Debbie** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:00 pm

YARDofSTUF wrote:Repost.

and don't forget it.

Spammy · Post by **Spammy** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:00 pm

Brent wrote: opcorn:

Do you mind sharing dude.
Gosh so rude.

jeremyboycool · Post by **jeremyboycool** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:01 pm

Here is another one

Noevo · Post by **Noevo** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:06 pm

don't think it's bias. Randy's last post in the speedguide membership thread was yanked completly. I don't remember the girl he posted too well because I have a habit of not remembering my dreams...but as I recall it was about the same nakedness as burkes.

YARDofSTUF · Post by **YARDofSTUF** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:08 pm

Noevo wrote:don't think it's bias. Randy's last post in the speedguide membership thread was yanked completly. I don't remember the girl he posted too well because I have a habit of not remembering my dreams...but as I recall it was about the same nakedness as burkes.

Actaully randy's chick had ther underwear fully on, but thats not really the thread for that type of stuff.

Spammy · Post by **Spammy** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:09 pm

Noevo wrote:don't think it's bias. Randy's last post in the speedguide membership thread was yanked completly. I don't remember the girl he posted too well because I have a habit of not remembering my dreams...but as I recall it was about the same nakedness as burkes.

Would this be better?

Brent · Post by **Brent** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:11 pm

whoa!

I accept!

CableDude · Post by **CableDude** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:11 pm

Mmmmm... Anne Hathaway.

mountainman · Post by **mountainman** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:13 pm

jeremyboycool wrote:This is a sign

Noevo · Post by **Noevo** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:23 pm

YARDofSTUF wrote:Actaully randy's chick had ther underwear fully on, but thats not really the thread for that type of stuff.

it was kind of in your face though, I think the picture has something to do with it. I don't think you can actually throw a blanket over all of them and say they had the same amount of clothes on so their the same. Just my opinion though.

and yes, I liked both pictures and reported neither.

jeremyboycool · Post by **jeremyboycool** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:27 pm

mountainman wrote:[http://z.about.com/d/homerepair/1/0/s/-/-/-/hammer.jpg

http://www.backyardcity.com/images/inf/ ... 92TCH.jpg]

64bit · Post by **64bit** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:18 pm

mm

Bastid · Post by **Bastid** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:07 pm

jeremyboycool wrote:

and

downhill · Post by **downhill** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:08 pm

Insulting and baiting posts removed except for some of Yard’s and Debbie’s. Still trying to figure out what to do about it.

Locked as well since the essence of the thread seems to have been lost.