This is really beginning to make me angry. Help! Please...

EvilAjax · Post by **EvilAjax** » Fri Mar 30, 2001 9:23 pm

Okay, just posting some feedback here. Surfing fast, web pages loading quickly

Haven't really tested downloading much, but I'll get to that right away. I'm going to test all the Rwins dan gave me, and see which gives me the best throughput. I just ran some speed tests, here are the results. (from pcpitstop.com) [DSL/Cable Modem Bandwidth Test] >Download Speed< Text Block Size 200 KB
Download Time 2860 ms
Receive Buffer 313632 bytes
Transmission Speed 559 Kb/s .. very impressed

Upload Speed 82 Kb/s.. very close to cap.. Cap is 640kbps down/90 up.

very nice, hopefully, the rwins I was provided with will increase that speed even more.. thanks again dan!

I'll post more feed back later
::had to edit:: forgot to add the TCP/IP analyzer results...
TCP options string = 020405aa0103030301010402

MTU = 1490
MTU is not fully optimized for broadband. Consider increasing your MTU to 1500 for better throughput.

MSS = 1450
Maximum useful data in each packet = 1450, which is equal to MSS.

Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 313632
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 3 bits
Unscaled Receive Window = 39204
For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS.
Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
510400 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)
255200 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
127600 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
63800 (MSS x 44)

bandwidth * delay product:
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 12545.28 kbps (1568.16 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 5018.112 kbps (627.264 KBytes/s) @ 500ms

MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON

Time to live left = 106 hops
TTL value is ok.

Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF

Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON

there ya go... sorry about that

[ 03-30-2001: Message edited by: EvilAjax ]

EvilAjax · Post by **EvilAjax** » Fri Mar 30, 2001 9:51 pm

Hey Dan, or anyone else.. I posted a topic about PPPoe in the software forum, and someone posted a reply telling me to use RASPPPoE. He said it's one of the best PPPoe clients out there.. Just want your approval.

Maybe we can work with this, unless enternet is our best option.. ?? Thanks again!

EvilAjax · Post by **EvilAjax** » Sat Mar 31, 2001 12:32 am

Transmission Speed 909 Kb/s... I just speed tested that from pcpitstop... At first I thought it was my cache, so I cleared it.. tested again and Transmission Speed 812 Kb/s... on a 640 kbps max? I dont know whats going on... but its hot

EvilAjax · Post by **EvilAjax** » Sat Mar 31, 2001 12:36 am

okay my bad, that site must be ****a... now my speed is friggin 550 kb/s not that anyone seems to care!!

dannjr · Post by **dannjr** » Sat Mar 31, 2001 1:34 am

Originally posted by EvilAjax:
okay my bad, that site must be ****a... now my speed is friggin 550 kb/s not that anyone seems to care!!

Oh stop Ok so know one cares.

ehehehe
What you have right now in that adjusted and tweaked Enternet program is faster and more stable than RASPPPoE.. I personally like RASPPPoE but Iv done a compare on both with the Enternet program set at them settings above, and guess what.. you got 800+ on your line... Then prime time hit and generally lasts till 3 in the morning saturday and pickup where it left off at 3pm today(saturday)
If your getting 550 right now good I expected less knowing where you go up on the net bases on tracerts just be glad you have a low ping

at 30ms and 50 average...

But if you want I can feel bad for you now.

dannjr · Post by **dannjr** » Sat Mar 31, 2001 1:34 am

See what it said

Originally posted by EvilAjax:
Transmission Speed 909 Kb/s... I just speed tested that from pcpitstop... At first I thought it was my cache, so I cleared it.. tested again and Transmission Speed 812 Kb/s... on a 640 kbps max? I dont know whats going on... but its hot

EvilAjax · Post by **EvilAjax** » Sat Mar 31, 2001 1:49 am

lol, I just switched rwins...
TCP options string = 020405aa0103030301010402

MTU = 1490
MTU is not fully optimized for broadband. Consider increasing your MTU to 1500 for better throughput.

MSS = 1450
Maximum useful data in each packet = 1450, which is equal to MSS.

Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 471712
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 3 bits
Unscaled Receive Window = 58964
For optimum performance, consider changing RWIN to a multiple of MSS.
Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
510400 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)
255200 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
127600 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
63800 (MSS x 44)

bandwidth * delay product:
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 18868.48 kbps (2358.56 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 7547.392 kbps (943.424 KBytes/s) @ 500ms

MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON

Time to live left = 106 hops
TTL value is ok.

Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF

Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON

Text Block Size 200 KB
Download Time 3020 ms
Receive Buffer 471712 bytes
Transmission Speed 530 Kb/s

Upload Speed 82 Kb/s
Go on aim dan, I wanna ask you something...

EvilAjax · Post by **EvilAjax** » Sat Mar 31, 2001 2:00 am

DAP is starting to show me suckiness... The IE download manager seems to be faster.. but anyway... I downloaded 2.33MB in 31 seconds, at a 77.2kb/sec transfer rate. That's pretty good, better than yesterday, when it took me 30 seconds to download 1.04 MB. Remember? Anyway, just giving you feedback. Dan, go on AIM, it's important, I mean if you dont wanna then you dont have to...

dannjr · Post by **dannjr** » Sat Mar 31, 2001 2:27 am

cant do AIM right now stuck with other work.. I'll be on tomarrow afternoon...
There's always email if its that pressing..

I'll be looking in here too...

EvilAjax · Post by **EvilAjax** » Sat Mar 31, 2001 4:40 am

Hey Dan, should I change my MaxMTU to 1492? To get better throughput? Or am I getting the best throughput on 1490?

dannjr · Post by **dannjr** » Sat Mar 31, 2001 4:51 am

Anything on PPPoE from 1486 to 1492 is good I only had you set it down 2 because you had the original problem when winpoet was still on the machine with the veiw of the pic's not comming through..

EvilAjax · Post by **EvilAjax** » Sun Apr 01, 2001 1:26 pm

TCP options string = 020405ac0103030101010402

MTU = 1492
MTU seems to be optimized for PPPoE... If you are not on a PPPoE connection, consider increasing your MTU to 1500 for optimal throughput.

MSS = 1452
Maximum useful data in each packet = 1452, which is equal to MSS.
MSS is optimized for PPPoE. If you are not on a PPPoE connection, consider increasing your MTU value.

Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 127776
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 1 bits
Unscaled Receive Window = 63888
RWIN is a multiple of MSS
Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
511104 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)
255552 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
63888 (MSS x 44)

bandwidth * delay product:
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 5111.04 kbps (638.88 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 2044.416 kbps (255.552 KBytes/s) @ 500ms

MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON

Time to live left = 106 hops
TTL value is ok.

Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF

Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON

New RWIN. This one seems to be fastest so far