Working in registry

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 10:09 am

Looks like it's comming along, Default TCP Window Size, Extreme test at http://www.pcpitstop.com

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 10:38 am

Just so you know it's not a one time deal

mnosteele52 · Post by **mnosteele52** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 10:50 am

All the questions being asked here and all you can do is post this? Nobody cares, when are you going to understand that? That's not even a reliable test, escpecially since you are above your caps. You have been posting here for a long time..... start helping answering questions - properly - and stop spamming.

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 3:49 pm

Bazzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

mnosteele52 · Post by **mnosteele52** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 3:50 pm

Originally posted by Lobo
Bazzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

HUH?

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 3:53 pm

escpecially since you are above your caps.

My CAPS are and have been 3500/384

mnosteele52 · Post by **mnosteele52** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 3:57 pm

UHHH DUH and your getting 4000 down........ UHHH INACCURATE!!! As usual you prove your own self wrong.

Norm · Post by **Norm** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 4:59 pm

UOD should put the both of you in his next SpeedGuide video

I get a kick out of these posts. I'm sure a video would be even better. Come on, talk to UOD and lets get the show on the road.

You guys are great, love you both

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 5:24 pm

I'm just trying to figure out what I have done, I get above 3300KB's down everytime at Speakeasy, night, day, peaktimes, whenever, no my IP has not changed, get 424KB's down on 64 Meg download test everytime, System restore is on, ICQ and other things with a DEFAULT RWIN, this has been driving me crazy for a week, I don't know what I did, it seem's as if changing settings TCP has no effect, I want to tell everyone but don't know what it is: see:

mnosteele52 · Post by **mnosteele52** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 5:28 pm

It's what I've been telling you all along.

1. RAM & CPU DON'T matter.

2. Ridiculously high RWINs are NOT better or faster.

It could also be that Comcast has upgraded their routers or servers, what has your latency with tracerts been? Also DO NOT just check your speed on local Speakeasy tests, try them all around the U.S.

ghettoside · Post by **ghettoside** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 5:28 pm

just trying to figure out what you've done?

yeah right...

got to agree w/ mnosteele

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 5:31 pm

No I know what I have done, but that does not cause this

Norm · Post by **Norm** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 5:55 pm

Originally posted by Lobo
No I know what I have done, but that does not cause this

You don't know anything, but how to get under mnosteeles skin.

Hey, I'm just keeping the thread going

mccoffee · Post by **mccoffee** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 6:14 pm

norm bump

j79zlr · Post by **j79zlr** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 7:33 pm

I haven't been here long, but 17,000 posts of pics with your browser in it seems odd

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 8:27 pm

I have tried speed tests everywhere, I been playing with computers 20 years and yes I have called Comcrap and they have changed nothing, I just want to know what it is $$$$$, Norm can I send you my registry, this is no joke, this thing flys for some reason, 17520, System restore, ICQ, Firewall, it does not matter, it still fly's and the same speed on large downloads, betwen 422 or 424KB's a sec and those nutty online tests are crazy high, I reformatted about a week ago, and Windows at the end of installing did not do it right, somethings up and it big, Phillip how about you, you know about this mess, any one but bless his heart

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 8:32 pm

52, If im getting 4000 down, they are not telling anyone, hehe

http://online.comcast.net/products/service.asp?link=3

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 8:57 pm

Phillip, it's peak time system restore is on, see whats running in background, ICQ on, crazy, I never seem anything like it, I made 2 Norton Ghost backups:
Sorry everyone for the pictures:

Default RWIN 17520

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 9:18 pm

I changed Window size to 578000 and got this, but I get the same with 17520, everythings on, I just don't get it, sorry again folks for the pic's:

Loonatic · Post by **Loonatic** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 9:22 pm

Lobo, your tweaks aren't changing your speeds.

Comcast turned on traffic shaping, giving us better speeds and more consistant speeds.

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 9:25 pm

You can't tweak this, any Window size, same results:

Service: isdndslcablewirelesssatellite Speed (advertised) kbit/s: Operating System: win95win98win98SEwinMEwinNTwin2kwinXPMacLinuxFBSDSolaris Connection: normalwinpoetwinXPpppoerouterpppoeraspppoeenternetpppoA

Your Tweakable Settings:
Receive Window (RWIN): 578000
Window Scaling: 4
Path MTU Discovery: ON
RFC1323 Window Scaling: ON
RFC1323 Time Stamping: OFF
Selective Acks: ON
MSS requested: 1460
TTL: unknown
TTL remaining: 117
TOS/TOS subfield: 010
TOS/Flags: 0000

Notes and recommendations:
Input line speed for RWIN recommendation
Looking good

Example 146000 byte download
Actual data bytes sent: 146000
Actual data packets: 100
Max packet sent (MTU): 1500
Max packet recd (MTU): 1500
Retransmitted data packets: 0
sacks you sent: 0
pushed data pkts: 1
data transmit time: 0.361 secs
our max idletime: 46.3 ms
transfer rate: 185879 bytes/sec
transfer rate: 1487 kbits/sec
This is not a speed test!
transfer efficiency: 100%

Notes and recommendations:
Good data stream (no/few rexmits)

ICMP (ping) check
Target unpingable

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 9:31 pm

Back to default window size and the other is to large for their test:

Your Tweakable Settings:
Receive Window (RWIN): 49152
Window Scaling: off
Path MTU Discovery: ON
RFC1323 Window Scaling: OFF
RFC1323 Time Stamping: OFF
Selective Acks: ON
MSS requested: 1460
TTL:
(less any hops behind firewall)
129
TTL remaining: 117
TOS/TOS subfield: 010
TOS/Flags: 0000

Notes and recommendations:
Input line speed for RWIN recommendation
Looking good

Example 146000 byte download
Actual data bytes sent: 146000
Actual data packets: 100
Max packet sent (MTU): 1500
Max packet recd (MTU): 1500
Retransmitted data packets: 0
sacks you sent: 0
pushed data pkts: 6
data transmit time: 0.412 secs
our max idletime: 64.4 ms
transfer rate: 153327 bytes/sec
transfer rate: 1226 kbits/sec
This is not a speed test!
transfer efficiency: 100%

Notes and recommendations:
Good data stream (no/few rexmits)

ICMP (ping) check
Minimum ping: 36 ms
Maximum ping: 69 ms
Ping stability:
36 44 69 39 36 44 37 38 40 44

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Thu Jun 05, 2003 9:49 pm

Default Window size, everything on, extreme test at http://www.pcpitstop.com

This is driving me nuts, UOD help

Download Bandwidth Test Results
Text Block Size 4000 KB

Download Time 9687 ms
Receive Buffer 17520 KB
Transmission Speed 3303 Kb/s

G|-|oST · Post by **G|-|oST** » Fri Jun 06, 2003 8:29 am

Well, well, well, if it isn't the picture-happy Lobo. Once again he is over-excited about yet another totally unexplained, unduplicated by anyone, totally radical discovery. This time it was a weird reformat/reinstall of Windows that did it. Well this has all kinds of broadband conspiracy theories written all over it.
Here is one. I remember that a while ago Lobo posted pictures (but of course he did) of Windows Longhorn beta of some sort, and now he reformatted, and ended up with a messed up Win install. So, clearly what happened was this. Lobo's Longhorn copy contained a super-secret code in it (written bi Bill Gates himself for his own personal use only) that automatically sucks the living crap out of any type of connection the machine is hooked up to, regardless of any settings whatsoever. This code is so tough, it spits at reformats. It stays on the machine, as it was specifically designed to survive a nuclear strike and still download well above ISP's caps.

I could go on, but I think we all get the point. Another stupid post from Lobo, this is nothing new.

It is kinda fun to make fun of his 'discoveries' though isn't it?

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Fri Jun 06, 2003 8:56 am

Here's another one, explain please old know it all:

Andrzej · Post by **Andrzej** » Fri Jun 06, 2003 11:40 am

:2cool: nice item
is it similar to AndyEffect ?
AndyEffect http://forums.speedguide.net/showthread ... ost1014522 link

please explain apropriate result to above from
miranda v5'20f http://miranda.ctd.anl.gov:7123/ LastUpd March 20, 2003 by Rich Carlson

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Fri Jun 06, 2003 12:10 pm

I like it, but am trying to find out why it is doing it between the cutdowns