CableNut patch

iceman3233 · Post by **iceman3233** » Sun Feb 25, 2001 6:49 pm

I tried the cablenut patch on win98 and winme before and it only seamed to slow my cable down so I removed them and it was faster. So I reinstalled on one machine with win2k cuz winme sux and I decided I would give cablenut 4.0 a try. Well here it is again downloads starting at 20KB a sec and going down to 5KB for the rest of the way. Why does it work for everyone but me?

Buggyman · Post by **Buggyman** » Sun Feb 25, 2001 7:00 pm

Cablenuts 4.0 is designed to allow you to adjust settings that works best for you.
You can go with the settings (they use beta testers to test the settings) they have and see if you like it.
If not then pull-up the CCS program and tweak with it.
I found my settings work best with FASTER cable even though I have normal cable.
But I can make minor adjustment if I want in the CCS.
That's one thing that's so great about 4.0.
Reminder! Tweaking is not for the weak stomach!

[ 02-25-2001: Message edited by: Buggyman ]

Duzmor · Post by **Duzmor** » Sun Feb 25, 2001 7:12 pm

This Might sound goofy but no body ever talks about the tweak over at Navas- setting TCP window size at 32767
Just a ????
Duzmor

HalfLifer · Post by **HalfLifer** » Sun Feb 25, 2001 7:54 pm

Try Rick Joshuas Win2k tweak.
Best Win2k tweak around.
Here.

Prey521 · Post by **Prey521** » Sun Feb 25, 2001 8:33 pm

Originally posted by HalfLifer:
Try Rick Joshuas Win2k tweak.
Best Win2k tweak around.
Here.

LOL, I just downloaded it and I realized that its the Speedcorp tweak, which I already use and totally kicks ass

Duzmor · Post by **Duzmor** » Sun Feb 25, 2001 8:37 pm

Halflifer: what is the patch for DSL or Cable
give us some Info on it
Duzmor

Prey521 · Post by **Prey521** » Sun Feb 25, 2001 8:44 pm

Originally posted by Duzmor:
Halflifer: what is the patch for DSL or Cable
give us some Info on it
Duzmor

Its for Cable and Win2K ONLY

Read more about it here

www.speedcorp.net/broadband/tweaks/win2k/

[ 02-25-2001: Message edited by: Prey521 ]

HalfLifer · Post by **HalfLifer** » Sun Feb 25, 2001 10:27 pm

Its really Ricks, he made it.

HalfLifer · Post by **HalfLifer** » Sun Feb 25, 2001 10:29 pm

Oh, and Rick made em for Windows 95/98, and ME. Hes still workin on the ME one, but the one for 95/98 is out!

iceman3233 · Post by **iceman3233** » Sun Feb 25, 2001 11:37 pm

OMG! OMG! THANK YOU! THAT PATCH OWNS! 600-800KB A SEC ALL THROUGH DOWNLOADS FROM GOOD SITES!

cablenut · Post by **cablenut** » Mon Feb 26, 2001 12:08 am

CABLENT SUCSK CUZ WHEN I TREID TO DOWNALOD FROM AOL IT SAID I WAS ONLY GIETTING 2 MEGABITS PER SECOND HAHAHAHAHAH *

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Mon Feb 26, 2001 9:39 am

Calm down, Cablenut, the problem is some people are going to fast, not reading direction and not loading CCS files, don't worry, be happy, you have good product

Rick · Post by **Rick** » Mon Feb 26, 2001 3:10 pm

Yes I agree, I think most of the tweaks out there are good. In fact, Cablenut's, Speedcorp and Speeguide tweaks & patches are fine stuffs. Lets not go about saying who's the worst or something. Its just that every system and OS reacts differently to certain tweaks. Just my 2cents though.

iceman3233 · Post by **iceman3233** » Mon Feb 26, 2001 4:10 pm

Damn cablenut! I am sorry if I offended you I just was mad after a reinstall because of stupid winme which is the 3rd reinstall I have done this month. I'm sure it would work if I tweaked it with that utility but I was in a hurry and dident bother trying. And I dont have AOL

I got something worse....@home.

cablenut · Post by **cablenut** » Mon Feb 26, 2001 4:48 pm

Ey thats fine im used to it I was just posting a funny

you are user #4,000,000 to have WinME problems

iceman3233 · Post by **iceman3233** » Mon Feb 26, 2001 8:28 pm

BTW I am using ur ramdisk tweak for win2k and its GREAT! I noticed like 200KB increase in download speed. Dont know if that tweak was responsible or not.

donald_k · Post by **donald_k** » Mon Feb 26, 2001 9:34 pm

heheheh WinME always has 'problems' with it. Get win2k...the nicest windows ever. Oh BTW when I was reading a magazine at school M$ had an ad for win2k. It showed a Windows 9x BSOD and bragged about windows2000's stability. It even has lines to cut out the BSOD and put in on your moniter if you miss the downtime

. I haven't had a BSOD on my box in ages

.

legalmind · Post by **legalmind** » Mon Feb 26, 2001 9:41 pm

Originally posted by cablenut:
Ey thats fine im used to it I was just posting a funny you are user #4,000,000 to have WinME problems

I tried to tell people about windows 95 in a shiny box.
Old code that MS had to use as their new OS is not ready.

Buggyman · Post by **Buggyman** » Mon Feb 26, 2001 10:12 pm

Well I for one like win/98se.
I remember verywell when they put it out.
They were under heavy stress to meet the demands of all these differance plug and play hardware they rush it out.
Then they when back and tried to cover up their rush deal with win/me and made it unprogramable. thus the so call win/me headaches you have.
Call me an OLD Diehard, but hey! win/98 so far has been the best windows platform I've ever seen.
As for Cablenut patch . They've made my lousy cable connection work better than any others so far.
Reason?
Because I can manually tweak indivisual settings to meet MY needs.
Can any other Patch do that?
HUMMMM??????

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Mon Feb 26, 2001 10:21 pm

Buggerman, you are out of your mind if you think that out-dated 98 is better than ME,
you remind me of Read my Lips Jr., going backwards, your going to be in the dark when the new OS comes out, way behind the people that kept up to date, ME is cool man

Buggyman · Post by **Buggyman** » Mon Feb 26, 2001 11:10 pm

At least I don't have to reformat all the time!

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Mon Feb 26, 2001 11:15 pm

That was because I was looking for the missing 200KB's, which I know you know nothing about

Buggyman · Post by **Buggyman** » Mon Feb 26, 2001 11:22 pm

and i suppose you found it?
I know where mine is! ATLANTA

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Mon Feb 26, 2001 11:26 pm

You keep blaming Atlanta, I think it's that 486 you got, fix wife's 750 hoss and get on the superhighway then with the right patch,
the one that works for you, whats his name?

Buggyman · Post by **Buggyman** » Mon Feb 26, 2001 11:46 pm

Since I get the last word in tonight.
Mine is NOT a 486.
It's a PC 100 board clocked at 83 MHz with a AMD 400 CPU processor
I have 128 megs of rams.
AND
it has been determined that the PROBLEM lies with the provider.
They admitted it.
So before you attack! GET THE FACTS!

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Tue Feb 27, 2001 7:24 am

For the 100th time it's RAM, no S, attack, I was not attacking, kidding, but since you jumped me suh, I demand a duel at dawn

Buggyman · Post by **Buggyman** » Tue Feb 27, 2001 10:41 am

I'm on my second cup of coffee!
Is it dawn yet?

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Tue Feb 27, 2001 10:46 am

I sure hope Dr. Cablenut can repair the back wound you are going to have, yes I quess I will shoot you in back cause you won't fix wife's pooter.

Buggyman · Post by **Buggyman** » Tue Feb 27, 2001 10:59 am

Well, we'll find out how good PC Progress is as a satisfing customer company (OOPS I'm advertising again)

Buggyman · Post by **Buggyman** » Thu Mar 01, 2001 10:34 pm

PC Progress said 5 more days... gee .. my wife will kill me before then.

Buggyman · Post by **Buggyman** » Fri Mar 02, 2001 10:43 am

Originally posted by Lobo:
I sure hope Dr. Cablenut can repair the back wound you are going to have, yes I quess I will shoot you in back cause you won't fix wife's pooter.

That must be you back there in Dale jr car chasing all them Pontiac !

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Fri Mar 02, 2001 10:57 am

First it was fords, now it's another brand
you remind me of something, er, ah, someone who changes RWIN# everyday looking fer sweet place, with a 750 hoss in house (broke) well someday at least maybe your wife can fly.