Help mr rollingstone

tazmaniax007 · Post by **tazmaniax007** » Mon Mar 29, 2010 5:50 am

i am running on a 2mbps internet connection, i was wondering how i can speed it up a little more...

here is my result using TCP analyzer

« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 03.29.2010 05:50
IP address: 112.205.xx.xx
Client OS: Windows XP

TCP options string: 020405b401010402
MSS: 1460
MTU: 1500
TCP Window: 65535 (NOT multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 0 bits
Unscaled RWIN : 65535
Recommended RWINs: 64240, 128480, 256960, 513920, 1027840
BDP limit (200ms): 2621kbps (328KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 1049kbps (131KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 112
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)

i would really appreciate any help.. thanks =)

mccoffee · Post by **mccoffee** » Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:02 am

download the optimizer TCP Optimizer Settings:
General Settings tab:
Custom settings - check
Modify All Network Adapters - check
network adapter selection - your NIC
MTU - 1500
TTL - 64
TCP Receive Window - 128480
MTU Discovery - Yes
Black Hole Detect - No
Selective Acks - Yes
Max Duplicate ACKs - 2
TCP 1323 Options:
Windows Scaling - check
Timestamps - uncheck

Advanced Settings tab:
Max Connections per Server - 10
Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 10
LocalPriority - 5
Host Priority - 6
DNSPriority - 7
NetbtPriority - 8
Lan Browsing speedup - optimized
QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0
ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0
ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 0
MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0
NetFailureCacheTime - 0
NegativeSOACache Time - 0
LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768
__________________

100 010 00 · Post by **100 010 00** » Tue Mar 30, 2010 4:38 am

mccoffee wrote:download the optimizer TCP Optimizer Settings:
General Settings tab:
Custom settings - check
Modify All Network Adapters - check
network adapter selection - your NIC
MTU - 1500
TTL - 64
TCP Receive Window - 128480
MTU Discovery - Yes
Black Hole Detect - No
Selective Acks - Yes
Max Duplicate ACKs - 2
TCP 1323 Options:
Windows Scaling - check
Timestamps - uncheck

Advanced Settings tab:
Max Connections per Server - 10
Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 10
LocalPriority - 5
Host Priority - 6
DNSPriority - 7
NetbtPriority - 8
Lan Browsing speedup - optimized
QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0
ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0
ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 0
MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0
NetFailureCacheTime - 0
NegativeSOACache Time - 0
LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768
__________________

Why u recommend 0? I use to set this to 254 and i can achieve half of megabit more in my connection. im asking because i dont know what is going on with the isps around there

akbarri · Post by **akbarri** » Tue Mar 30, 2010 5:44 am

100 010 00 wrote:Why u recommend 0? I use to set this to 254 and i can achieve half of megabit more in my connection. im asking because i dont know what is going on with the isps around there

http://www.speedguide.net/tcpoptimizer.php#advanced_qos

ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 0 => class 0, default (routine)

ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 254 => ?

254 = 111 111 10

111 => Network Control
1 => Low Delay
1 => High Throughput
1 => High Reliability
1 => Low Cost
0 => MBZ checking bit (Must Be Zero)

hmm, "ToS = 254" so weird setting for me.
recommended TOS Value => 0(default), 80, 136 & 184 => depending by DiffServ Field

mccoffee · Post by **mccoffee** » Tue Mar 30, 2010 7:16 am

maybe i need an rfc refresher but as said above sometimes another server sets that value.

akbarri · Post by **akbarri** » Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:48 am

mccoffee wrote:maybe i need an rfc refresher but as said above sometimes another server sets that value.

yap, but he was said

100 010 00 wrote:Why u recommend 0? I use to set this to 254 and i can achieve half of megabit more in my connection. im asking because i dont know what is going on with the isps around there

normally last 2 digit always set "00", for decimal 254 last 2 binary digit "10".
that setting abnormal for me

one more thing

100 010 00 wrote:Why u recommend 0? I use to set this to 254 and i can achieve half of megabit more in my connection. im asking because i dont know what is going on with the isps around there

give me ur speedtest result for
ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 254 &
ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 0

mccoffee · Post by **mccoffee** » Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:55 am

I'm not sure how the tos seting would give such a speed burst unless it's matched with your setting matched the isp server even then i don't think it would have that much impact on speed.

I admit i do need to re read up on it i could be wrong.

mccoffee · Post by **mccoffee** » Tue Mar 30, 2010 9:00 am

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2474

100 010 00 · Post by **100 010 00** » Tue Mar 30, 2010 9:19 am

11111110=254, i know that this is overall network control, and the last digit must be zero, i'll check it out once again when ill find an xp machine and time. remember that my package is 24/1mbit (22/1 sync) over dsl and i mean that, i can achieve 19,7~8 and without tos value or even less about 19,2 or something like that.

100 010 00 · Post by **100 010 00** » Wed Mar 31, 2010 4:10 am

« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 03.31.2010 04:05
IP address: 77.49.xx.xx
Client OS: Windows XP

TCP options string: 020405ac0103030301010402
MSS: 1452
MTU: 1492
TCP Window: 522720 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 3 bits (2^3=8)
Unscaled RWIN : 65340
Recommended RWINs: 63888, 127776, 255552, 511104, 1022208
BDP limit (200ms): 20909kbps (2614KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 8364kbps (1045KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 46
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 11111110 (254)
Precedence: 111 (Network Control)
Delay: 1 (low delay)
Throughput: 1 (low throughput)
Reliability: 1 (low reliability)
Cost: 1 (low cost)
Check bit: 0 (correct)
DiffServ: No valid DiffServ equivalent (111111)

So guys,
this is my xp machine and as u can see i have set it to 254. this is my best setting. No problem with page loading or other. im not equivalent, but does not matter, works fine

edited: After several speedtests, i dont see any differences in dl speeds (weird, before 2 years i swear in, that i have seen differences) but the general internet response times, are much better with tos 254.

trogers · Post by **trogers** » Wed Mar 31, 2010 5:03 am

100 010 00 wrote: edited: After several speedtests, i dont see any differences in dl speeds (weird, before 2 years i swear in, that i have seen differences) but the general internet response times, are much better with tos 254.

Could be that your ISP has adjusted network control to be equal to 0...lol

100 010 00 · Post by **100 010 00** » Thu Apr 01, 2010 3:00 am

Hi trogers,

im not sure if that can exists, cause if tos is been overwitten by your isp, it will be shown in any analyzers

akbarri · Post by **akbarri** » Thu Apr 01, 2010 4:04 pm

100 010 00 wrote:« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 03.31.2010 04:05
IP address: 77.49.xx.xx
Client OS: Windows XP

TCP options string: 020405ac0103030301010402
MSS: 1452
MTU: 1492
TCP Window: 522720 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 3 bits (2^3=8)
Unscaled RWIN : 65340
Recommended RWINs: 63888, 127776, 255552, 511104, 1022208
BDP limit (200ms): 20909kbps (2614KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 8364kbps (1045KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 46
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 11111110 (254)
Precedence: 111 (Network Control)
Delay: 1 (low delay)
Throughput: 1 (low throughput)
Reliability: 1 (low reliability)
Cost: 1 (low cost)
Check bit: 0 (correct)
DiffServ: No valid DiffServ equivalent (111111)

So guys,
this is my xp machine and as u can see i have set it to 254. this is my best setting. No problem with page loading or other. im not equivalent, but does not matter, works fine

edited: After several speedtests, i dont see any differences in dl speeds (weird, before 2 years i swear in, that i have seen differences) but the general internet response times, are much better with tos 254.

what is ur settings for :
ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting
ToS: DefaultTOSValue

100 010 00 · Post by **100 010 00** » Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:36 am

u already know the answer. u can see it in the analyzer but,(irrelevant) why those 2 are shown in low mode? they must be shown as high

Throughput: 1 (low throughput)
Reliability: 1 (low reliability)

akbarri · Post by **akbarri** » Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:04 am

100 010 00 wrote:u already know the answer. u can see it in the analyzer but,(irrelevant) why those 2 are shown in low mode? they must be shown as high

Throughput: 1 (low throughput)
Reliability: 1 (low reliability)

no i dont

in my case:
i set TCP Optimizer Settings
ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting = 0
ToS: DefaultTOSValue = 0

my TCP Analyzer Result
IP ToS: 10001000 (136)
Precedence: 100 (flash override)
Delay: 0 (normal delay)
Throughput: 1 (low throughput)
Reliability: 0 (normal reliability)
Cost: 0 (normal cost)
Check bit: 0 (correct)
DiffServ: AF41 100010 (34) - Assured Forwarding class 4, low drop precedence (RFC 2597).

see, i cannot read ToS Settings from TCP Analyzer result

so, what is ur settings @ TCPO?
ur case very interesting for me

100 010 00 · Post by **100 010 00** » Fri Apr 02, 2010 2:11 pm

ok.....

ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting = 0
ToS: DefaultTOSValue =254

in your case the tos is written by your isp, in my case nope

akbarri · Post by **akbarri** » Sat Apr 03, 2010 1:31 am

100 010 00 wrote:ok.....

ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting = 0
ToS: DefaultTOSValue =254

in your case the tos is written by your isp, in my case nope

yap in my case ToS was overwritten by ISP.
n ur right they must be shown as High

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc791#page-12

now i know the problem?
TCP Analyzer issue for our both case

my TCP Analyzer Result
IP ToS: 10001000 (136)
Precedence: 100 (flash override)
Delay: 0 (normal delay)
Throughput: 1 (low throughput) => high throughput
Reliability: 0 (normal reliability)
Cost: 0 (normal cost)
Check bit: 0 (correct)
DiffServ: AF41 100010 (34) - Assured Forwarding class 4, low drop precedence (RFC 2597).

ur TCP Analyzer Result
IP ToS: 11111110 (254)
Precedence: 111 (Network Control)
Delay: 1 (low delay)
Throughput: 1 (low throughput) => high throughput
Reliability: 1 (low reliability) => high reliability
Cost: 1 (low cost)
Check bit: 0 (correct)
DiffServ: No valid DiffServ equivalent (111111)

i will fw to philip, hope he can help

100 010 00 · Post by **100 010 00** » Sat Apr 03, 2010 3:14 am

im sure he can help, these are just 2 variables.

Post by **Philip** » Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:17 am

Thanks for catching that. You're right, seems the values are correct, just that the descriptions were wrong on those two throughput/reliability ToS settings.

It's been corrected.

Oh, and here are the ToS values from the RFCs, they're listed in the tables: http://www.speedguide.net/tcpoptimizer.php#advanced_qos

The only problem with ToS of 254 is that it does not have a DiffServ equivalent, which is a bit newer QoS variant. In a DiffServ environment, it may be better to set it differently, as per the DiffServ table in the above link.

akbarri · Post by **akbarri** » Sat Apr 03, 2010 10:03 am

Philip wrote:Thanks for catching that. You're right, seems the values are correct, just that the descriptions were wrong on those two throughput/reliability ToS settings.

It's been corrected.

Oh, and here are the ToS values from the RFCs, they're listed in the tables: http://www.speedguide.net/tcpoptimizer.php#advanced_qos

The only problem with ToS of 254 is that it does not have a DiffServ equivalent, which is a bit newer QoS variant. In a DiffServ environment, it may be better to set it differently, as per the DiffServ table in the above link.

re-check

IP ToS: 10001000 (136)
Precedence: 100 (flash override)
Delay: 0 (normal delay)
Throughput: 1 (high throughput)
Reliability: 0 (normal reliability)
Cost: 0 (normal cost)
Check bit: 0 (correct)
DiffServ: AF41 100010 (34) - Assured Forwarding class 4, low drop precedence (RFC 2597).

correct, thanks

tazmaniax007 · Post by **tazmaniax007** » Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:44 am

so what am i going to do now?

tazmaniax007 · Post by **tazmaniax007** » Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:55 am

here is my results now

« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 04.11.2010 04:54
IP address: 112.205.xx.xx
Client OS: Windows XP

TCP options string: 020405b40103030101010402
MSS: 1460
MTU: 1500
TCP Window: 128480 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 1 bits (2^1=2)
Unscaled RWIN : 64240
Recommended RWINs: 64240, 128480, 256960, 513920, 1027840
BDP limit (200ms): 5139kbps (642KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 2056kbps (257KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 48
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)

mccoffee · Post by **mccoffee** » Sun Apr 11, 2010 11:37 am

how's the speed?

tazmaniax007 · Post by **tazmaniax007** » Mon Apr 26, 2010 5:42 am

its just the same

Rollingstone · Post by **Rollingstone** » Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:23 am

tazmaniax007 wrote:here is my results now

« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 04.11.2010 04:54
IP address: 112.205.xx.xx
Client OS: Windows XP

TCP options string: 020405b40103030101010402
MSS: 1460
MTU: 1500
TCP Window: 128480 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 1 bits (2^1=2)
Unscaled RWIN : 64240
Recommended RWINs: 64240, 128480, 256960, 513920, 1027840
BDP limit (200ms): 5139kbps (642KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 2056kbps (257KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 48
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)

HOw about speedtest.net ?

tazmaniax007 · Post by **tazmaniax007** » Sat May 22, 2010 3:00 am

marktiu33 · Post by **marktiu33** » Sun May 30, 2010 11:58 pm

ang bagal ng connection 20k lng download speed kuh..pa help po.. 1500kb pinabayaran kuh

« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 05.30.2010 21:30
IP address: 125.212.xxx.x
Client OS: Windows XP

TCP options string: 020405a001010402
MSS: 1440
MTU: 1480
TCP Window: 16644 (NOT multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 0 bits
Unscaled RWIN : 16644
Recommended RWINs: 63360, 126720, 253440, 506880, 1013760
BDP limit (200ms): 666kbps (83KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 266kbps (33KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 44
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)

SG Broadband Community

Help mr rollingstone

Help mr rollingstone

speed is the same

SPEEDTEST.net is also the same

pa help din po ako