Search found 17 matches
- Wed Nov 06, 2024 1:23 pm
- Forum: Broadband Tweaks Help
- Topic: Maximum number of RSS Queues performance
- Replies: 4
- Views: 10430
Re: Maximum number of RSS Queues performance
i see, so its still better to have a dedicated NIC. i also have a older machine that has a Intel NIC that i used to have a dedicted card for. i thought it was the same thing, but its good to know that onboard NIC is worse than dedicated even if its the same chipset.
- Wed Nov 06, 2024 6:55 am
- Forum: Broadband Tweaks Help
- Topic: Maximum number of RSS Queues performance
- Replies: 4
- Views: 10430
Re: Maximum number of RSS Queues performance
I leave it at 4 queues as opposed to 8 queues. I have a Marvell AQtion NIC. I forgot the model number, but its a recent on-board NIC from an Aorus Master Z790 with the latest drivers. Have you ever personally found 8 queues to work better with a certain brand? Would 8 queues be more for a corporate ...
- Sun Nov 03, 2024 8:10 pm
- Forum: Broadband Tweaks Help
- Topic: Maximum number of RSS Queues performance
- Replies: 4
- Views: 10430
Maximum number of RSS Queues performance
Has anyone else noticed that using "8 Queues" for the "Maximum number of RSS Queues" under NIC properties slows down your internet speeds? I have a 13900kf configured with E-Cores and HT disabled, so I have 8 active cores running, which correlates with setting this value to "8 Queues".
Could ...
Could ...
- Wed Oct 16, 2024 11:24 am
- Forum: Broadband Tweaks Help
- Topic: InitialRto 1000 - Default for W11 Canary 27723
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7377
Re: InitialRto 1000 - Default for W11 Canary 27723
After doing some googling, I decided that with modern connections nowadays, 1000 should be enough for a tineout. Considering even W11 feels this way, I would make it default for TCPOptimizer as well.
- Wed Oct 16, 2024 10:27 am
- Forum: Broadband Tweaks Help
- Topic: InitialRto 1000 - Default for W11 Canary 27723
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7377
InitialRto 1000 - Default for W11 Canary 27723
It looks like for Windows 11 Canary 27723, the InitialRto setting defaults to 1000 as opposed to it being 3000 previously. Would you say this is a more logical and modern setting nowadays? Or should we leave it at 2000/3000 still for gaming?
- Tue Oct 15, 2024 5:57 pm
- Forum: Broadband Tweaks Help
- Topic: TCP Pacing Profile
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7519
Re: TCP Pacing Profile
Doing some googling and reading articles, I came to the conclusion that TCP Pacing suits more of a server environment, as it prevents "bursts", and delays traffic. Common sense tells me this will increase latency, so Im going to say keep this setting off for gaming.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org ...
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org ...
- Tue Oct 15, 2024 5:13 pm
- Forum: Broadband Tweaks Help
- Topic: EnableWsd (TCP autotuning diagnostic tool) on or off
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7482
Re: EnableWsd (TCP autotuning diagnostic tool) on or off
My apologize, I should of mentioned I did indeed restart and did this test 3 times each with it set to 0 and 1, making a total of several computer reboots.
- Tue Oct 15, 2024 1:37 pm
- Forum: Broadband Tweaks Help
- Topic: EnableWsd (TCP autotuning diagnostic tool) on or off
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7482
Re: EnableWsd (TCP autotuning diagnostic tool) on or off
Contrary to the documentation, it appears this setting has no effect on speeds and toggling TCP1323 Window Auto-Tuning. I get an average of 925mbps whether its on or off. This is the results I got before ever messing with the setting. To be on the safe side, and to follow the documentation, the ...
- Tue Oct 15, 2024 11:13 am
- Forum: Broadband Tweaks Help
- Topic: EnableWsd (TCP autotuning diagnostic tool) on or off
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7482
EnableWsd (TCP autotuning diagnostic tool) on or off
Is the TCP autotuning diagnostic tool required when using TCP Window Auto-Tuning? I definitely have a philosophy of disabling bloat for lower latency. Does it need to be enabled for TCP Window Auto-Tuning to function? Does this setting improve how said option works? Is it better to leave enabled for ...
- Tue Oct 15, 2024 9:37 am
- Forum: General Broadband Forum
- Topic: Bufferbloat doesn't want to give me an A + :-(
- Replies: 18
- Views: 38725
Re: Bufferbloat doesn't want to give me an A + :-(
I did some benchmarks between disabled, normal, and experimental. Heres the results.
disabled:
https://ibb.co/VS2BFtj
normal:
https://ibb.co/J7n0V6x
experimental:
https://ibb.co/0QHkFKG
Using normal setting defintely has the max throughput like you said, while disabled nerfs my throughput ...
disabled:
https://ibb.co/VS2BFtj
normal:
https://ibb.co/J7n0V6x
experimental:
https://ibb.co/0QHkFKG
Using normal setting defintely has the max throughput like you said, while disabled nerfs my throughput ...
- Mon Oct 14, 2024 11:41 pm
- Forum: General Broadband Forum
- Topic: Bufferbloat doesn't want to give me an A + :-(
- Replies: 18
- Views: 38725
Re: Bufferbloat doesn't want to give me an A + :-(
Is that the scenerio the test creates?
- Mon Oct 14, 2024 8:36 pm
- Forum: Broadband Tweaks Help
- Topic: TCP Pacing Profile
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7519
TCP Pacing Profile
What would be the best setting for the TCP Pacing Profile option? I currently have it set to "slowstart" according to this tweak guide.
https://sites.google.com/site/tweakradje/windows/windows-tweaking
It does mention its for Hyper-V 2019 servers, so im very skeptical and feel it should be ...
https://sites.google.com/site/tweakradje/windows/windows-tweaking
It does mention its for Hyper-V 2019 servers, so im very skeptical and feel it should be ...
- Mon Oct 14, 2024 5:05 pm
- Forum: Broadband Tweaks Help
- Topic: Large Send Offload (LSO) says enabled after reboot
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7394
Re: Large Send Offload (LSO) says enabled after reboot
So running "Get-NetAdapterLso -Name *" does confirm its disabled, but TCPOptimizer still reads enabled. Do you think its a bug with TCPOptimizer reading the setting? Heres a pic to show you what I mean. Im on the wired Ethernet profile.
https://ibb.co/djy68mG
https://ibb.co/djy68mG
- Mon Oct 14, 2024 12:49 pm
- Forum: Broadband Tweaks Help
- Topic: Add BBR2 option to Congestion Control Provider
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7586
Re: Add BBR2 option to Congestion Control Provider
I was switching between CTCP and CUBIC for testing, but wanted an easier way to test BBR2 than using netsh.
- Mon Oct 14, 2024 12:44 pm
- Forum: General Broadband Forum
- Topic: Bufferbloat doesn't want to give me an A + :-(
- Replies: 18
- Views: 38725
Re: Bufferbloat doesn't want to give me an A + :-(
The biggest change I did to increase my score was to actually completely disable TCP Auto-Tuning and all Offloading options except Checksum offloading, via TCPOptimizer and NIC properties.
- Sun Oct 13, 2024 7:35 pm
- Forum: Broadband Tweaks Help
- Topic: Large Send Offload (LSO) says enabled after reboot
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7394
Large Send Offload (LSO) says enabled after reboot
When disabling Large Send Offload (LSO) via TCPOptimizer and doing a reboot, the setting claims to still be enabled when opening TCPOptimizer after reboot. When going to NIC properties, LSO says its disabled, for both V1 and V2, along with IPv4 and IPv6. I have a Marvell AQtion 10GBASE-T NIC with ...
- Sun Oct 13, 2024 7:22 pm
- Forum: Broadband Tweaks Help
- Topic: Add BBR2 option to Congestion Control Provider
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7586
Add BBR2 option to Congestion Control Provider
Please add BBR2 option to Congestion Control Provider setting for TCPOptimizer.