Radeon 7500 64 MB DDR, Radeon 8500 64 MB DDR, Vs. Geforce 4 MX 440
Radeon 7500 64 MB DDR, Radeon 8500 64 MB DDR, Vs. Geforce 4 MX 440
Im thinking about a new video card, please post you opinions about which video card you think is better.
ATI Radeon 7500 64 MB DDR VS. nVidia Geforce 4 MX 440
ATI Radeon 8500 64 MB DDR VS. nVidia Geforce 4 MX 440
Radeon 7500 or Geforce 4 MX 440?
Radeon 8500 or Geforce 4 MX 440?
ATI Radeon 7500 64 MB DDR VS. nVidia Geforce 4 MX 440
ATI Radeon 8500 64 MB DDR VS. nVidia Geforce 4 MX 440
Radeon 7500 or Geforce 4 MX 440?
Radeon 8500 or Geforce 4 MX 440?
I agree, the 8500 is the better card.
You may want to look at Geforce 4 Ti4200 though. It's near the price range of the 8500
You may want to look at Geforce 4 Ti4200 though. It's near the price range of the 8500
Fdisk?
It only take me one beer to get drunk...just not sure if it's the ninth or tenth one
It only take me one beer to get drunk...just not sure if it's the ninth or tenth one
- onetrueday
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4796
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2000 12:00 am
- Location: Floating down a river of Dingleberry Juice
I wouldnt even consider a gf3 ti500, it's simply not worth the price. i have a radeon8500 64meg and i've been very happy with it. In this same system, I've also run a msi gf3 ti200. I feel the ti200 wasSLIGHTLY better at the time with games. However, the radeon drivers have improved alot since then; plus the radeon was better for movies and 2d display. That's even with the less drivers I was using at the time.
All things considered, I would only consider three cards. Either the gf3 ti200, the radeon 8500, or the gf4 ti4200. Since all three cards will perform amazingly, given any computer; I would base the matter on price and availability.
All things considered, I would only consider three cards. Either the gf3 ti200, the radeon 8500, or the gf4 ti4200. Since all three cards will perform amazingly, given any computer; I would base the matter on price and availability.
MSI 845 Ultra-ARU
p4 1.8a @ 47 BILLION
radeon8500 (4 HS's)
2 80gig WD se's raid0/120gig WD
30gigWD/15gigMaxtor/1.2gig WD
512megs corsair pc3000xms
p4 1.8a @ 47 BILLION
radeon8500 (4 HS's)
2 80gig WD se's raid0/120gig WD
30gigWD/15gigMaxtor/1.2gig WD
512megs corsair pc3000xms
you would consider the gf3 ti500 when its only $120 US. Like you, I also considered the gf3 ti200. But when I found a ti500 about $20 cheaper than the ti200. That's a bargain u cannot pass up. =o)Originally posted by onetrueday
I wouldnt even consider a gf3 ti500, it's simply not worth the price. i have a radeon8500 64meg and i've been very happy with it. In this same system, I've also run a msi gf3 ti200. I feel the ti200 wasSLIGHTLY better at the time with games. However, the radeon drivers have improved alot since then; plus the radeon was better for movies and 2d display. That's even with the less drivers I was using at the time.
All things considered, I would only consider three cards. Either the gf3 ti200, the radeon 8500, or the gf4 ti4200. Since all three cards will perform amazingly, given any computer; I would base the matter on price and availability.
- YARDofSTUF
- Posts: 70006
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 12:00 am
- Location: USA