SG TCP/IP Analyzer Results, HELP?!?!

Get help and discuss anything related to tweaking your internet connection, as well as the different tools and registry patches on the site. TCP Optimizer settings and Analyzer results should be posted here.
Post Reply
PatrickW
Member
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2001 5:04 pm

SG TCP/IP Analyzer Results, HELP?!?!

Post by PatrickW »

TCP options string = 020405b401010402

MTU = 1500
MTU is fully optimized for broadband.

MSS = 1460
Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which is equal to MSS.

Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 64240
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits
Unscaled Receive Window = 64240
RWIN is a multiple of MSS
Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)
256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)

bandwidth * delay product:
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 2569.6 kbps (321.2 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 1027.84 kbps (128.48 KBytes/s) @ 500ms

MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON

Time to live left = 116 hops
TTL value is ok.

Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF

Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON

IP type of service field (RFC1349)= 00000000

Any idea of what I can do, right now I am reading that everyone on attbi is getting like at least 1500/128, I get 1400/120. :rolleyes:
User avatar
HalfLifer
Posts: 7086
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Detroit, Michigan Internet: Comcast Narrowband

Post by HalfLifer »

Uhhh

1400/120 is perfect. Most get under 1000/100. No need to complain.
User avatar
HenryHand1
Regular Member
Posts: 165
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2001 10:19 am
Location: New Jersey, USA

Post by HenryHand1 »

Your settings are fine, unless you are using DSL and it is PPPoE implemented (you launch a program to connect to the internet).

If you do use DSL with PPPoE, change your MTU to 1492. Otherwise, 1400/120 is within range of the 1500/128 speeds, and I wouldn't worry about it too much.
PatrickW
Member
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2001 5:04 pm

ok I guess I got greedy...

Post by PatrickW »

ill leave it alone
User avatar
HalfLifer
Posts: 7086
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Detroit, Michigan Internet: Comcast Narrowband

Post by HalfLifer »

Originally posted by HenryHand1
Your settings are fine, unless you are using DSL and it is PPPoE implemented (you launch a program to connect to the internet).

If you do use DSL with PPPoE, change your MTU to 1492. Otherwise, 1400/120 is within range of the 1500/128 speeds, and I wouldn't worry about it too much.

Read his post, hes got cable.
PatrickW
Member
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2001 5:04 pm

yeah i am on cable...

Post by PatrickW »

if i use dslreports.com tweak test, I have problems in retransmission of packets, not sure what that means... if anyone wants i can post the link...actually i will

http://monitor.dslreports.com/tweak/blo ... via=normal
PatrickW
Member
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2001 5:04 pm

What controls speed?

Post by PatrickW »

is the mss/mtu the only thing that really matters when trying to tweak for more speed? right now I am pretty sure I have a good setup, although I would like 50k more on download and about 10k on upload... here are my results, take a look and please tell me if you have any suggestions

TCP options string = 020405b401010402

MTU = 1500
MTU is fully optimized for broadband.

MSS = 1460
Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which is equal to MSS.

Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 37960
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits
Unscaled Receive Window = 37960
RWIN is a multiple of MSS
Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)
256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
64240 (MSS x 44)

bandwidth * delay product:
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 1518.4 kbps (189.8 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 607.36 kbps (75.92 KBytes/s) @ 500ms

MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON

Time to live left = 116 hops
TTL value is ok.

Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF

Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON

IP type of service field (RFC1349)= 00000000

:(
User avatar
HenryHand1
Regular Member
Posts: 165
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2001 10:19 am
Location: New Jersey, USA

Post by HenryHand1 »

Originally posted by HalfLifer



Read his post, hes got cable.
He didn't say 'cable' anywhere in his post. Just attbi, which I haden't heard of.
User avatar
HenryHand1
Regular Member
Posts: 165
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2001 10:19 am
Location: New Jersey, USA

Re: What controls speed?

Post by HenryHand1 »

Originally posted by PatrickW
is the mss/mtu the only thing that really matters when trying to tweak for more speed? right now I am pretty sure I have a good setup, although I would like 50k more on download and about 10k on upload... here are my results, take a look and please tell me if you have any suggestions

TCP options string = 020405b401010402

MTU = 1500
MTU is fully optimized for broadband.

MSS = 1460
Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which is equal to MSS.

Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 37960
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 0 bits
Unscaled Receive Window = 37960
RWIN is a multiple of MSS
Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)
256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
64240 (MSS x 44)

bandwidth * delay product:
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 1518.4 kbps (189.8 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 607.36 kbps (75.92 KBytes/s) @ 500ms

MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON

Time to live left = 116 hops
TTL value is ok.

Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF

Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON

IP type of service field (RFC1349)= 00000000

:(
No, time stamps and RWIN especially matter too but your settings are very good. I looked at your tweak test results and 82% transfer efficency is pretty bad. Running a DSLR line quality test could discover what may be wrong. Otherwise, you might want to lower your RWIN to the next lowest multiple of MSS (36500 in your case).
PatrickW
Member
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2001 5:04 pm

Post by PatrickW »

attbi is att broadband internet
Post Reply