2006 Ford Fusion SE 4-cylinder

Discuss anything not covered in another forum (life, the universe etc.)... Please keep it PG-13 and avoid spam.
Post Reply
User avatar
minir
Posts: 27941
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Canada

2006 Ford Fusion SE 4-cylinder

Post by minir »

Hi to all

Nice Family Car. Ford caught it right imho.
---


The base 4-cylinder Fusion "is a little sluggish" off the line but offers "adequate passing power," reports Chris Chase. Highlights include "a high-quality feel on the road" and "a balanced cornering attitude."

Criticisms? The automatic transmission has a tendency to "hold first gear longer than necessary," and there are "a couple of ergonomic flaws," he says.

http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/cc/06fusion.htm

---

regards

minir
User avatar
YARDofSTUF
Posts: 70006
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 12:00 am
Location: USA

Post by YARDofSTUF »

I want one, V6 version though :)


Tach and speedo should be switched too.
User avatar
minir
Posts: 27941
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Canada

Post by minir »

Hi YARDofSTUF

I wouldn't be surprised to find it Car of the Year.

They really did a nice job of it i think too.

--

Thanks YARDofSTUF

larry
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

Filling the market that the prior "Tempo" models used to fill? They even had the ol' 2.3L engine. Side and rear views are nice...I can't get past that front end though...just a personal taste, but it reminds me too much of some Cadillac models front ends.
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
User avatar
minir
Posts: 27941
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Canada

Post by minir »

Hi YeOldeStonecat

Looks better in thw flesh YeOldeStonecat. It kinda grows on ya.

The back-end is a little high i think, but it is the year of the bum, thanks to Bangle :rotfl:

Have a lovely day & Thanks for your input as always :)

--

regards

minir
Lefty
Posts: 18882
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: SG Tavern

Post by Lefty »

I think this falls in line with the conservative designs of Ford. Way too conservative. I wish they would go out a little and experiment with something instead of years and years of the same old thing. The only car that has any style is the Stang.

I have kind of liked the way Nissan has gone in style, pushing the edge and trying to move the lines around on thier vehicles. At least the design dept. is willing to gamble a little.
User avatar
minir
Posts: 27941
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Canada

Post by minir »

Hi Lefty

There has been a change in philosophy at Ford in its Design Dept. They no longer want to out Euro the Europeans, rather to Americanize their future models.

Back to a N. American look. Beefy, substantial and with a more American feel to things.

It was hard to compete with the Germans and Japanese and they started to melt into a Me Too look that kinda made them shrink into the mold.

They decided to make a statement and a Company look that said, Hey! Were Different. I think they succeeded.

Time and customer response will be the final arbiter though, but it appears to be working so far in the Press etc.

Good value, American sizing & looks. We'll soon know.

Just my opinion.

--

Thanks Lefty and do have a terrific day :)

--

regards

minir
User avatar
brembo
Posts: 18725
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 12:00 am
Location: crawlspaces

Post by brembo »

Heh, Mazda already made one, calls it the "Mazda 6" I think. :D
Tao_Jones Cult Member since 2004
I gave Miss Manners a Dirty Sanchez, and she LIKED it.
User avatar
minir
Posts: 27941
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Canada

Post by minir »

Hi brembo

In chassis only brembo and even that is shorter :D

--

regards

minir
User avatar
RoscoPColtrane
Posts: 6153
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 12:00 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Post by RoscoPColtrane »

i read that the fusion is one of the least safe cars in recent years.... :eek:
****************************************************************************************
Abit NF7-S 2.0, Barton 2500+ @ 2.2 Ghz, 2 Gig ddr3200, 80gig Seagate HDD, ATI x850 PRO @ 550/600, WinXP Pro

J B K M

Pittsburgh Steelers Super Bowl XL Champions!!!!!
User avatar
YARDofSTUF
Posts: 70006
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 12:00 am
Location: USA

Post by YARDofSTUF »

RoscoPColtrane wrote:i read that the fusion is one of the least safe cars in recent years.... :eek:

Its like 4 out of 5 stars.
User avatar
RoscoPColtrane
Posts: 6153
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 12:00 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Post by RoscoPColtrane »

YARDofSTUF wrote:Its like 4 out of 5 stars.

Hmmm, I musta been misinformed then...sorry for the mistake!

:)
****************************************************************************************
Abit NF7-S 2.0, Barton 2500+ @ 2.2 Ghz, 2 Gig ddr3200, 80gig Seagate HDD, ATI x850 PRO @ 550/600, WinXP Pro

J B K M

Pittsburgh Steelers Super Bowl XL Champions!!!!!
User avatar
minir
Posts: 27941
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Canada

Post by minir »

Hi RoscoPColtrane


There was a minor criticism about side impact or something? Overall it did very well i believe.

--

regards

minir
User avatar
minir
Posts: 27941
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Canada

Post by minir »

Hi RoscoPColtrane



I checked it out and found the following
----

NHTSA Crash-Test Results
Test 4-door sedan
----------------------

Front Impact, Driver 4
Front Impact, Passenger 4
Rollover Resistance 4

----

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's crashworthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Side-impact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-

====

To address the safety concerns of family sedan buyers, Ford strengthened the car's platform in various areas. The B-pillars, between the front and rear doors, are reinforced above the car's beltline to direct side-impact energy down and away from passengers. The roof structure is similarly reinforced to pass proposed rollover crush standards that won't take effect until 2009, and an optional side airbag package offers seat-deployed torso airbags for front passengers and side curtain airbags that protect both front and rear occupants.

Safety:
Four-wheel disc brakes are standard equipment on all Fusions. Options on all Fusions include ABS with Electronic Brakeforce Distribution and an airbag package with front-seat side airbag and full-length head curtains. Traction control is optional on V6 models, but stability control is not available at all.

--

It may be a bit overdue, but it would appear Ford's Fusion was worth the wait.

---

regards

minir
User avatar
BlindPilot
Regular Member
Posts: 488
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 8:42 am
Location: My knees are exploding!

Post by BlindPilot »

I'd rather have one of the new Focus models, but them im not exactly looking to carry anything or anyone..

Image
For King And Country!
User avatar
minir
Posts: 27941
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Canada

Post by minir »

Hi BlindPilot


Nice as well, but a differing mission in life.

Thanks and have a good one :)

--

regards

minir
Post Reply