Can i set up 4 hdd's as Raid 0

Anything related to hardware (CPU/MoBo/Video/FSB/BIOS, etc.), hardware settings, overclocking, cooling, cool cases, case mods, hardware mods, post pics of your unique creations here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Jada
Regular Member
Posts: 495
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:55 pm
Location: London

Can i set up 4 hdd's as Raid 0

Post by Jada »

Need some help, Ive built a server and I want to raid 0 with the 4 hdd's Ive got in the PC, but it will only allow two of the disks to be setup as raid 0.

I need all 4 working in raid 0, anyone know where im going wrong.

Asus P4C800

SATA Drives, Winxp
User avatar
ScottE
Posts: 16860
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2001 12:00 pm

Post by ScottE »

The ICH5 only supports two disks in a RAID. Nothing you are doing wrong the Chipset doesn't support it. You need an add in card if you want more than 2 in a RAID.
Respect it.
User avatar
Jada
Regular Member
Posts: 495
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:55 pm
Location: London

Post by Jada »

ScottE wrote:The ICH5 only supports two disks in a RAID. Nothing you are doing wrong the Chipset doesn't support it. You need an add in card if you want more than 4 in a RAID.
Damn ok i have 4 Sata hdd's installed just setup windows and of course only can see the 2 hdd's in Raid 0, all i really need is to have these 4 hdd's working i dont need this PC as raid, is there a way i can have all drives working non raid, my board has 4 sata ports.

Thanks..
User avatar
Faust
Posts: 8730
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2000 4:34 am
Location: Huntington Beach, CA

Post by Faust »

4 drives and 4 sata ports. i dont see a problem. unless the RAID controller doesnt support normal ATA/SATA drive configs.


on the RAID side, does that controller support RAID 0+1? you'd only get 1/2 the space (compared to the grand total space between all the drives), but the striped array would have 2x the fault tolerance (by mirroring the striped volume). that would be my choice is i wanted to put all 4 drives to work, 'specially since it's in a server.
"Today is a black day in the history of mankind."

- Leo Szilard
User avatar
YeOldeStonecat
SG VIP
Posts: 51171
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 12:00 pm
Location: Somewhere along the shoreline in New England

Post by YeOldeStonecat »

Jada wrote:Ive built a server and I want to raid 0

:eek: The words "Server" and "RAID 0" in the same sentence should scare the heck out of you. Either RAID 0/1, or 5 them.
MORNING WOOD Lumber Company
Guinness for Strength!!!
User avatar
Jada
Regular Member
Posts: 495
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:55 pm
Location: London

Post by Jada »

YeOldeStonecat wrote: :eek: The words "Server" and "RAID 0" in the same sentence should scare the heck out of you. Either RAID 0/1, or 5 them.
Hi, Ive split the Raid into two, after my first post here i re-did the Raid array and formatted windows then installed some drivers from motherboard disk and this time the other 2 hdd's showed as one large 600 gig hdd, so now i have 2 600 gig hdd's showing in windows, although im not quite sure what i did as Ive not slept and was/am tired, so im guessing i have 2 Raid 0.

Ill run a few programs to check this, the pc is running great.

Here is a pic of it.

http://www.jada1.plus.com/raid.JPG

Just done some checks and yes its two Raid 0.
User avatar
ghost
SG VIP
Posts: 11599
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 1999 12:00 am
Location: Virginia

Post by ghost »

With all those drives (and big drives too, that will have lots of data), why aren't you implementing some sort of redundancy? Remember RAID 0 = ZERO fault tolerance.

I would suggest what YOSC said. 0/1 or 5.

Redundancy is your friend.
User avatar
loop2kil
SG Elite
Posts: 5231
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2000 12:00 am
Location: Atlanta GA

Post by loop2kil »

ghost wrote:With all those drives (and big drives too, that will have lots of data), why aren't you implementing some sort of redundancy? Remember RAID 0 = ZERO fault tolerance.

I would suggest what YOSC said. 0/1 or 5.

Redundancy is your friend.
I learned my lesson the hard way and will never store important data on non-redundant arrays again.
Post Reply