Page 2 of 2

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:42 pm
by zooner
could you with a step-sister?

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:43 pm
by CableDude
:nope:

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:47 pm
by Sarahnn
Brent wrote:You don't have to specify who you are, just yes or no.
I am happy to say no, but I have been propositioned more than once by a sheep since coming to Speedguide. :wth:

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:59 pm
by aeonblue11
I honestly don't see anything morally wrong with having relations with a step sister, considering that she isnt acually related to you. although it would still be really weird and I would never consider it. To each his own.

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 7:03 pm
by downhill
Since this is the second thread on the subject by the same member...I'd say it's nothing more than a grab at a little attention...

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 7:06 pm
by knightmare
Maybe Brent's new girlfriend is his cousin?

greenies for you.....

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 7:26 pm
by thepieman
aeonblue11 wrote:I honestly don't see anything morally wrong with having relations with a step sister, considering that she isnt acually related to you. although it would still be really weird and I would never consider it. To each his own.
If you mean step-sister as in mother or father remarried with existing children, not from either parent , then that wouldn't be considered incestuous. A half-brother or half sister, would be tho, like a child seeded from one father but different mothers.


Pie

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 7:28 pm
by thepieman
I would have but my mother-law-turned me down




ahahahaha Gee I wonder who that might be but probably because of obvious reasons didn't choose to pick it. Cmon now..You know you wanna pick it PREY!

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 7:29 pm
by Lefty
disturbing topic. ib4l :wth:

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 7:38 pm
by Brent
downhill wrote:Since this is the second thread on the subject by the same member...I'd say it's nothing more than a grab at a little attention...
Whoever did it, I do not appreciate my poll being edited to include options I did not originally include.

This was a serious poll, but apparently the moderation here don't want serious discussions/polls. :rolleyes:

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 7:46 pm
by tao_jones
Brent wrote:Whoever did it, I do not appreciate my poll being edited to include options I did not originally include.

This was a serious poll, but apparently the moderation here don't want serious discussions/polls. :rolleyes:
You need a hobby man.

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 8:08 pm
by Sarahnn
downhill wrote:Since this is the second thread on the subject by the same member...I'd say it's nothing more than a grab at a little attention...
The way I see it, you started a thread on Bush grabbing power, now you say the author of this thread is grabbing attention.

I think you have an issue with Grabbing.

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 8:39 pm
by Izzo
downhill wrote:Since this is the second thread on the subject by the same member...I'd say it's nothing more than a grab at a little attention...
Naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 8:48 pm
by CableDude
Izzo wrote:Naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhh.
:rotfl:

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 8:57 pm
by hayc59
Ok my mother-n-law who by the way
looks like angie dickerson did way back!!
forced me to pleasure her a long time ago
and ofcouse I had to try to fight her off for a very short time
and well.........you know the rest of the story BAMMM!!!

*fixed for prosperity
heheheh

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 9:01 pm
by Meggie
hayc59 wrote:Ok my mother-n-law who by the way
looks like angie dickerson dick way back!!
forced me to pleasure her a long time ago
and ofcouse I had to try to fight her off for a very short time
and well.........you know the rest of the story BAMMM!!!
lets hope ur wife doesnt read speedguide :p

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 9:03 pm
by Izzo
hayc59 wrote:Ok my mother-n-law who by the way
looks like angie dickerson dick way back!!
forced me to pleasure her a long time ago
and ofcouse I had to try to fight her off for a very short time
and well.........you know the rest of the story BAMMM!!!

[snickers at dickerson dick] :D

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 9:08 pm
by CableDude
hayc59 wrote:looks like angie dickerson dick way back!!
:wth:

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 9:16 pm
by A_old
wow. this is useless, no btw. anyway yea. wow. lol

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 9:34 pm
by hayc59
opsss major typo
that should be 'DID'
dammit gumby......oh ****

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 9:35 pm
by hayc59
Meggie I love that avatar
Image

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 9:50 pm
by Zilog B
Keg Party wrote: (someone here has a thing for their mother in law don't they?)

I know I'm late to the thread but

BWAHAHAHAHHAHAAH :rotfl:

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:37 pm
by Meggie
hayc59 wrote:Meggie I love that avatar
Image
thanks :)

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:41 pm
by brembo
Brent wrote:Whoever did it, I do not appreciate my poll being edited to include options I did not originally include.

This was a serious poll, but apparently the moderation here don't want serious discussions/polls. :rolleyes:


Awww poor fella! Does hims need a wittle reassurance?

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:08 pm
by nightowl
Brent wrote:Whoever did it, I do not appreciate my poll being edited to include options I did not originally include.

This was a serious poll, but apparently the moderation here don't want serious discussions/polls. :rolleyes:

apperently texans are very sensitive this time of year :p

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:09 pm
by Immortal
At least he is consistent with his topic themes....

https://www.speedguide.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=11020

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:18 pm
by downhill
Immortal wrote:At least he is consistent with his topic themes....

https://www.speedguide.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=11020
Hey..you forgot one!

https://www.speedguide.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=191663

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:58 pm
by Bastid
Brent wrote:However, I suspect that many here would classify a blow job, or fondling, or even just sneaking a peek at your sister naked in the shower on purpose, Incest. So that definition is much broader than it seems.

In this thread I am using the term "Incestuous Relationship" to mean a love relationship, sex or not, between two people that are blood related.
but you are trying to manipulate the definition of incestious... Meggie gave you the definition to that particular word, plain and simple incest=sex between immediate blood relatives ... which is totally different than what you are proposing. maybe you should re-name your thread with an appropriate heading...

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 1:09 am
by sito
I kissed and touched pee pees with my first cousin when I was 7. I still haven't confessed to Jesus for this crime. :(

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 1:16 am
by Kyle
Brent, your threads are going to attract some strange Googlers...

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 3:16 am
by Croc
Brent wrote:You don't have to specify who you are, just yes or no.
*sigh*

That is all.

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:45 am
by Rainbow
the only thing this thread is good for............+1

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 9:39 am
by Zilog B
sito wrote:I kissed and touched pee pees with my first cousin when I was 7. I still haven't confessed to Jesus for this crime. :(

wtf! :rotfl: