Bowl game predictions

Discuss anything not covered in another forum (life, the universe etc.)... Please keep it PG-13 and avoid spam.
User avatar
Roody
SG VIP
Posts: 30735
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: East Tennessee

Post by Roody »

Bowl results after 7 games.

=========

Roody: 3-4
Sava: 2-5
User avatar
Gixxer
SG Elite
Posts: 9471
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 8:33 pm

Post by Gixxer »

i will happy if i am 1 - 0
a.k.a. GSXR 750
User avatar
Gixxer
SG Elite
Posts: 9471
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 8:33 pm

Post by Gixxer »

a.k.a. GSXR 750
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

Roody wrote:Bowl results after 7 games.

=========

Roody: 3-4
Sava: 2-5
I'm sure miami winning in a few days will even that out then the BCS bowl games will likely flip flop it once a few teams win and a few others get crushed ;)
User avatar
Roody
SG VIP
Posts: 30735
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: East Tennessee

Post by Roody »

Ivory is fifth Hurricane suspended from Emerald Bowl

CORAL GABLES, Fla. -- Miami punt snapper Chris Ivory will not play in Saturday's Emerald Bowl because he violated an unspecified team rule.

He is the fifth Hurricanes player to be suspended for the final game of the season.

Ivory did not accompany the Hurricanes to San Francisco, where Miami (7-5) will face California (8-4) on Saturday.

He also was suspended for the season-opener against Charleston Southern for another rules violation, but won the Albert Bentley Award as the team's most valuable walk-on player.

Jake Byrne, who handles snaps on field goals, will take over Ivory's punt-team duties. Byrne also will be the backup quarterback behind Jacory Harris, who will start after Robert Marve was suspended for missing classes.

Tight ends Richard Gordon and Tervaris Johnson, along with linebacker Jordan Futch, also were suspended last week for the bowl game because of team rules violations.
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/bowls08/n ... id=3792899
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

Miami could prob lose their whole starting line up and still beat CAL.
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

Hell of a West VA game...Both teams played great!
User avatar
Roody
SG VIP
Posts: 30735
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: East Tennessee

Post by Roody »

Updated results.

======

Roody: 3-6
Sava: 2-7
User avatar
Roody
SG VIP
Posts: 30735
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: East Tennessee

Post by Roody »

The FSU punter is the player of the game so far. That dude keeps placing punts inside the 5 yard line. :eek:
User avatar
Roody
SG VIP
Posts: 30735
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: East Tennessee

Post by Roody »

Sava700 wrote:Miami could prob lose their whole starting line up and still beat CAL.
The experts would disagree with you bigtime. In fact Scouts, Inc in their breakdown of the game only gave the edge to Miami with the D-Line. Every other area is favored by Cal. My own personal guess is Miami will either win close or lose by 10 or more.
User avatar
horsemen_
Senior Member
Posts: 1488
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2002 3:30 pm
Location: Edwards Air force base Ca

Post by horsemen_ »

Roody on your list you have bc,NC, and fsu winning but say acc only wins 1 bowl :confused:
User avatar
Roody
SG VIP
Posts: 30735
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: East Tennessee

Post by Roody »

horsemen_ wrote:Roody on your list you have bc,NC, and fsu winning but say acc only wins 1 bowl :confused:
I haven't updated the list yet. I am about to do that now.
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

Roody wrote:The FSU punter is the player of the game so far. That dude keeps placing punts inside the 5 yard line. :eek:
That one punt he put on the half yard line with a single bounce and it just staying there was unreal....
User avatar
Roody
SG VIP
Posts: 30735
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: East Tennessee

Post by Roody »

The FSU/Wisconsin game looked as lopsided as I imagine the Georgia/MSU game will be.
User avatar
Roody
SG VIP
Posts: 30735
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: East Tennessee

Post by Roody »

Cal should be beating Miami handily, but Longshore once again is all over the place.
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

Roody wrote:Cal should be beating Miami handily, but Longshore once again is all over the place.
you crazy..even the play callers have said Miami is controlling this game even being down 3 points. Everyone is all over the place..the field is a mess. This game should have been played in mid- country not in California anyway. This is a problem for bowl games IMO..they should be in a neutral/central site.

If Miami keeps playing like they have been...they will win as projected.
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

So far its been a very entertaining game.. CAL got very lucky to force a fumble with 3mins left on the 3 yard line..I mean this field is awful for footing for any player as we've seen the whole game. Whoever wins you can't say either team didn't play great thats for sure.
User avatar
Roody
SG VIP
Posts: 30735
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: East Tennessee

Post by Roody »

Updated predictions:

Roody: 4-6
Sava: 2-8

Only 3 games left we disagree in man (Rose, Orange & Title Game). You need a clean sweep.
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

Roody wrote:Updated predictions:

Roody: 4-6
Sava: 2-8

Only 3 games left we disagree in man (Rose, Orange & Title Game). You need a clean sweep.
well I'm not in it for a contest and its easy to see I'm picking all ACC teams to win which is pretty straight forward. If they don't then its not a big deal. I'm only concerned with a few games anyway and thats the New Years games, national championship,fiesta bowl and the Georgia Tech game cause I just like watching LSU get beat.
User avatar
Roody
SG VIP
Posts: 30735
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: East Tennessee

Post by Roody »

Sava700 wrote:well I'm not in it for a contest and its easy to see I'm picking all ACC teams to win which is pretty straight forward. If they don't then its not a big deal. I'm only concerned with a few games anyway and thats the New Years games, national championship,fiesta bowl and the Georgia Tech game cause I just like watching LSU get beat.
I'm all about supporting your conference, but you bring emotion into it way to much which is why you routinely lose to me in these things. Still if that's how you want to do it it's fine by me, but don't deny you wouldn't be rubbing it in if you were to win. ;)
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

Roody wrote:I'm all about supporting your conference, but you bring emotion into it way to much which is why you routinely lose to me in these things. Still if that's how you want to do it it's fine by me, but don't deny you wouldn't be rubbing it in if you were to win. ;)
I expect you to rub it in if USC wins Thursday..and I'll be sure to do the same if Penn wins. Same goes for VATech, doesn't bother me one bit..its all in good fun. Can't wait to see USC get CRUSHED and Texas stomp OSU too! :thumb:
User avatar
Roody
SG VIP
Posts: 30735
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: East Tennessee

Post by Roody »

That's why I stated last week I was going to limit my sports discussions with you. Common sense doesn't factor into the equation much with you. Again you allow emotion to dictate your decision making way to much. Percentages do not support your theory of a blowout of USC. Yes anything can happen in theory, but USC won't get blown out. That much is certain. Of course no one here knows what your idea of crushing is, but I'm sure you will tell us after the fact.

Oh and btw I have no desire to rub in a Va. Tech loss if it were to happen. Again, I have stated that Va.Tech isn't anything special this year and IMO undeserving of a BCS bowl. With that in mind if they lose I won't consider it all that surprising.

Anyway, that's all I have to say for now.
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

Roody wrote: Oh and btw I have no desire to rub in a Va. Tech loss if it were to happen. Again, I have stated that Va.Tech isn't anything special this year and IMO undeserving of a BCS bowl. With that in mind if they lose I won't consider it all that surprising.

Anyway, that's all I have to say for now.
Undeserving of a BCS Bowl?? are you kidding? They won the games that mattered, when it mattered most. They won their conference which is the same with Cincy to go to the Orange Bowl fair and square. If anyone is undeserving of a BCS Bowl game its OSU... up for large pick my butt. They weren't picked for the team they are and their record they were picked clearly on how many fans they could bring which makes it about money and not the team. Sure its beating the dead horse you love so much but its flat out true. VATech is in a league of its own and will prove that next year for sure against Alabama...I'll be there to watch them roll that tide!
User avatar
Roody
SG VIP
Posts: 30735
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: East Tennessee

Post by Roody »

Sava700 wrote:Undeserving of a BCS Bowl?? are you kidding? They won the games that mattered, when it mattered most. They won their conference which is the same with Cincy to go to the Orange Bowl fair and square. If anyone is undeserving of a BCS Bowl game its OSU... up for large pick my butt. They weren't picked for the team they are and their record they were picked clearly on how many fans they could bring which makes it about money and not the team. Sure its beating the dead horse you love so much but its flat out true.
We already covered this. I have nothing new to add.
VATech is in a league of its own and will prove that next year for sure against Alabama...I'll be there to watch them roll that tide!
:rotfl:
User avatar
Gixxer
SG Elite
Posts: 9471
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 8:33 pm

Post by Gixxer »

Sava700 wrote:Undeserving of a BCS Bowl?? are you kidding? They won the games that mattered, when it mattered most. They won their conference which is the same with Cincy to go to the Orange Bowl fair and square. If anyone is undeserving of a BCS Bowl game its OSU... up for large pick my butt. They weren't picked for the team they are and their record they were picked clearly on how many fans they could bring which makes it about money and not the team. Sure its beating the dead horse you love so much but its flat out true. VATech is in a league of its own and will prove that next year for sure against Alabama...I'll be there to watch them roll that tide!

OSU is more deserving than tech to go to a bcs bowl, i can tell you that.

tech in a league of it's own? maybe in a penal league.
a.k.a. GSXR 750
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

Gixxer wrote:OSU is more deserving than tech to go to a bcs bowl, i can tell you that.

tech in a league of it's own? maybe in a penal league.
The situation is clear.. OSU - didn't win Conference , VATech - Did win Conference.

You really can't argue it anymore than that.
User avatar
Roody
SG VIP
Posts: 30735
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: East Tennessee

Post by Roody »

Record wise Ohio State was certainly more impressive then Va. Tech (Although OSU did lose their 2 biggest games this year against PSU and USC.). All that said Va. Tech achieved what they had to achieve in order to get into a BCS game. Ohio State got it by virtue of being a big money draw.

However I do think the BCS should investigate the situation further because a 4 loss team playing in a BCS game is just sad. Kudos to Va. Tech for winning their conference, but like Ohio State they just weren't worthy of playing in a BCS bowl. For the Hokies sake I hope they beat Cincy because it would be downright pathetic for any conference to field a team that won their conference and ended up with 5 losses.
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

Roody wrote:Record wise Ohio State was certainly more impressive then Va. Tech (Although OSU did lose their 2 biggest games this year against PSU and USC.). All that said Va. Tech achieved what they had to achieve in order to get into a BCS game. Ohio State got it by virtue of being a big money draw.

However I do think the BCS should investigate the situation further because a 4 loss team playing in a BCS game is just sad. Kudos to Va. Tech for winning their conference, but like Ohio State they just weren't worthy of playing in a BCS bowl. For the Hokies sake I hope they beat Cincy because it would be downright pathetic for any conference to field a team that won their conference and ended up with 5 losses.

I agree that OSU did play a nice season but the season VATech played was really a test of teams to be honest.. I mean the ACC had more teams with winning seasons, more teams in bowl games than any other conference which shows how strong the conference is... but as we found out Clemson whom is in a bowl game was rather week early in the season when it lost to a way too hyped opening game against Alabama..which I hope isn't going to happen when they play VATech next year. But i'll say this.. the hokies better win this damn bowl game...i've spent alot of money this year in supporting a winning team to see them lose again so I'm glad they are spending more time this year practicing than they did last year.
User avatar
Gixxer
SG Elite
Posts: 9471
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 8:33 pm

Post by Gixxer »

Sava700 wrote:I agree that OSU did play a nice season but the season VATech played was really a test of teams to be honest.. I mean the ACC had more teams with winning seasons, more teams in bowl games than any other conference which shows how strong the conference is... but as we found out Clemson whom is in a bowl game was rather week early in the season when it lost to a way too hyped opening game against Alabama..which I hope isn't going to happen when they play VATech next year. But i'll say this.. the hokies better win this damn bowl game...i've spent alot of money this year in supporting a winning team to see them lose again so I'm glad they are spending more time this year practicing than they did last year.

if they were good they would not need your money as they would have plenty. ;)
a.k.a. GSXR 750
User avatar
Roody
SG VIP
Posts: 30735
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: East Tennessee

Post by Roody »

Heading into today's games the standings are as follows.

Roody: 6-6
Sava: 4-8
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

aww yeah thats right NC and Rutgers are playing.. I hurt my back today hunting so I've been a little out of it
User avatar
Gixxer
SG Elite
Posts: 9471
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 8:33 pm

Post by Gixxer »

a.k.a. GSXR 750
User avatar
Gixxer
SG Elite
Posts: 9471
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 8:33 pm

Post by Gixxer »

a.k.a. GSXR 750
User avatar
Roody
SG VIP
Posts: 30735
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: East Tennessee

Post by Roody »

Big 10 teams just don't hold up well against USC. I doubt this time will be any different.
User avatar
Roody
SG VIP
Posts: 30735
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: East Tennessee

Post by Roody »

The Alamo bowl should be fun to watch tonight. Plenty of offense I would suspect.

Also, I updated the conference standings list in the first post of this thread.
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

Although I figured Rutgers would win I was rather surprised how well NC St played.. they were not that bad this year and really made the game interesting from what little I was able to catch.

Updated my picks too.. I'm thinking Oklahoma St will end up beating Oregon, after looking at who Oregon has played and stats against pretty much every team I think they are rather weak and Oklahoma St having a better offense will win.
User avatar
Roody
SG VIP
Posts: 30735
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: East Tennessee

Post by Roody »

9-3 isn't to bad. They could have always finished 8-4 or even worse.
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

Roody wrote:9-3 isn't to bad. They could have always finished 8-4 or even worse.
that 9-3 was a easy one though.. with teams like Washington for a win and the others hardly making it interesting it really looks like a boring game too. Oklahoma St will likely win this... perhaps by 10or more.
User avatar
Roody
SG VIP
Posts: 30735
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2000 12:00 am
Location: East Tennessee

Post by Roody »

So you discovered this after you did some research is that it? As opposed to not doing it before?
Updated my picks too.. I'm thinking Oklahoma St will end up beating Oregon, after looking at who Oregon has played and stats against pretty much every team I think they are rather weak and Oklahoma St having a better offense will win.
User avatar
Sava700
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 7:51 am
Location: Somewhere

Post by Sava700 »

Roody wrote:So you discovered this after you did some research is that it? As opposed to not doing it before?
I think I some how over looked this game the first time is all which is fine...


This Missouri game is getting interesting..here we are in OT and to be honest I'm pulling for NorthWestern although I've picked Missouri...they look to be playing better plus I'm tired of seeing Chase Daniels mom cringe so much on national tv... I mean come on ESPN..your getting as bad as Fox now. :rolleyes:
Post Reply