Page 1 of 1
Speed?
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 12:23 am
by Boost
Okay, so I've read all over and I'm just not coming up with anything that suits my connection. My caps are 3500/384 on Comcast Pro, using Win2000 SP3, 551MHz PIII, 512MB RAM, 20GB HDD, etc.. Here are the results of the TCP Optimizer test (FYI, I'm using Lobo's CableNut settings):
Browser/OS = Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.0.3705)
TCP options string = 020405b40103030201010402
MTU = 1500
MTU is fully optimized for broadband.
MSS = 1460
Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS.
Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 256960
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 2 bits
Unscaled Receive Window = 64240
RWIN is a multiple of MSS
Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)
128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
64240 (MSS x 44)
bandwidth * delay product:
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 10278.4 kbps (1284.8 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 4111.36 kbps (513.92 KBytes/s) @ 500ms
MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON
Time to live left = 50 hops
TTL value is ok.
Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF
Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON
IP type of service field (RFC1349)= 00000000
So what can I do to speed this up, if anything?
Thanks.
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 2:08 am
by SICMF
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 2:20 am
by Boost
What am I looking for here? These tweaks all appear to be XP related, and I am on Win2K SP3.
Thanks.
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 2:28 am
by Lobo
Try them, there for W2K and XP

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 2:31 am
by Boost
Originally posted by Lobo
Try them, there for W2K and XP
Thank you for the clarification. Will check these out and see what I come up with.

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 3:07 am
by Boost
And I'm back. About the only thing I hadn't done yet that was on that page was the system.ini tweak, which I decided to set at 8192. This seemed to help a little bit with loading pages, but I am not certain of this.
Anything else you guys can offer up?
Thanks again.
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 3:57 am
by CaptainSpeleo
Boost:
What speeds are you getting anyway? Go
here and run 4 - 5 speed tests. Clean out your browser cache before each test. Post the results.
Frank's Windows 95/98 Tips 
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 4:22 am
by Boost
Originally posted by CaptainSpeleo
Boost:
What speeds are you getting anyway? Go here and run 4 - 5 speed tests. Clean out your browser cache before each test. Post the results.
#1] 1797 down/359 up.
#2] 2885 down/354 up.
#3] 1938 down/323 up.
#4] 2225 down/357 up.
:/
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 6:54 am
by joecool169
Welcome to Speedguide Boost

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 1:58 pm
by mnosteele52
Boost! try the following settngs in Cablenut:
DefaultReceiveWindow = 448512
DefaultSendWindow = 49152
DisableAddressSharing = 1
InitialLargeBufferCount = 100
InitialMediumBufferCount = 240
InitialSmallBufferCount = 320
LargeBufferSize = 81920
MaxFastTransmit = 64000
MediumBufferSize = 15040
PriorityBoost = 0
SmallBufferSize = 1280
TransmitWorker = 32
FastSendDatagramThreshold = 4096
EnableFastRouteLookup = 1
EnablePMTUDiscovery = 1
IgnorePushBitsOnReceive = 0
GlobalMaxTcpWindowSize = 64240 or 128480 or 219000
MaxFreeTcbs = 8000
MaxHashTableSize = 16384
MaxNormLookupMemory = 5000000
SackOpts = 1
SynAttackProtect = 1
Tcp1323Opts = 0 (set to 1 if TcpReceiveWindow is 65535 or higher)
TcpLogLevel = 1
TcpMaxDupAcks = 2
TcpMaxHalfOpen = 100
TcpMaxHalfRetried = 80
TcpRecvSegmentSize = 1460
TcpSendSegmentSize = 1460
TcpTimedWaitDelay = 30
TcpUseRFC1122UrgentPointer = 0
TcpWindowSize = 64240 or 128480 or 219000
MaxConnectionsPer1_0Server = 40
MaxConnectionsPerServer = 20
DefaultTTL = 64
DisableUserTOSSetting = 0
TcpMaxDataRetransmissions = 6
DefaultTOSValue = 92
Add the following line to your registry:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\AFD\Parameters
BufferMultiplier - DWORD - hexidecimal value of 400.
Also read the Help & Tips link in my signature and try the other suggestions.

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 2:01 pm
by Lobo
I have same CAPS as you, try settings in help thread below

Re: Speed?
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 2:24 pm
by mnosteele52
Originally posted by Boost!
(FYI, I'm using Lobo's CableNut settings):
He is.

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 3:00 pm
by Boost
Ok, I tried mnosteele's settings, and the results of some speed tests from chi.speakeasy.com are as follows:
2780/363
2938/353
2775/353
2689/361
Seems to be a bit more stable.
Going to try a few other things, and will check back later. Thanks for the help so far!
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 3:03 pm
by Lobo
Now try real download test

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 3:42 pm
by Boost
Originally posted by Lobo
Now try real download test
From
ftp://ftp1.optonline.net/pub/test64 I got 340KB/sec average, when before I was getting 327KB/sec average, so not much difference on that end.
The TCP/IP Analyzer now reads:
TCP options string = 020405b40103030201010402
MTU = 1500
MTU is fully optimized for broadband.
MSS = 1460
Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS.
Default Receive Window (RWIN) = 219000
RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 2 bits
Unscaled Receive Window = 54750
RWIN is a multiple of MSS
Other values for RWIN that might work well with your current MTU/MSS:
513920 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 8)
256960 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 4)
128480 (MSS x 44 * scale factor of 2)
64240 (MSS x 44)
bandwidth * delay product:
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 8760 kbps (1095 KBytes/s) @ 200ms
Your RcvWindow limits you to: 3504 kbps (438 KBytes/s) @ 500ms
MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON
Time to live left = 50 hops
TTL value is ok.
Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF
Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON
IP type of service field (RFC1349)= 00000000
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 6:23 pm
by joecool169
340KB/sec is 90% of your cap, I don't think you can ask for much more then that

Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2002 12:17 am
by Boost
Originally posted by joecool169
I don't think you can ask for much more then that
Never hurts to try.
Thank you for the welcome earlier in the thread; I missed it.
how much $$$?
Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2002 3:26 am
by rclayton17
How much does it cost per month for those kinda caps anyway? and is it cable modem?
speed
Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2002 4:39 pm
by noaht1980
joecool169
that guy was getting 340 KB/sec and you told him that was 90% of his cap?
340x8=2720 wich isnt even close to 90% of his cap
3150 is 90% of his cap
2720 and 3150 is alot of differance my friend 430 differance
he is at 78% of his caps
not trying to be rude just telling you he should be able to get another 400 or more then he is getting now with the right settings wich is alot its a additonal 50 KB/Sec
Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2002 4:41 pm
by Lobo
On a 3MB download test, hehehehehe

speed
Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2002 4:42 pm
by noaht1980
lobo
dont you agree that he should get better then 2700 on a 3500 line?
Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2002 4:45 pm
by Lobo
Heck yes, but he needs to take bigger test

FTP
Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2002 4:49 pm
by noaht1980
i agree
i like the FTP tests :-)
Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2002 4:55 pm
by Lobo
Re: speed
Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2002 6:06 pm
by joecool169
Originally posted by noaht1980
joecool169
that guy was getting 340 KB/sec and you told him that was 90% of his cap?
340x8=2720 wich isnt even close to 90% of his cap
3150 is 90% of his cap
2720 and 3150 is alot of differance my friend 430 differance
he is at 78% of his caps
not trying to be rude just telling you he should be able to get another 400 or more then he is getting now with the right settings wich is alot its a additonal 50 KB/Sec
oops my bad

speed
Posted: Sat Aug 17, 2002 5:00 am
by noaht1980
joecool169
i was just saying that cause i didnt want that guy thinking he was maxing out at 2700 on a 3500 line :-)
Posted: Sat Aug 17, 2002 11:52 pm
by joecool169
yeah silly me I had been calculating that wrong, and I even knew the right way
Need more coffee I guess
