SG Broadband Community

Well guyz, I don't know if you browse through SPEEDCORPS, I have postings there about NetFast HS as well, I'm a tweaker along with a few other friends, I heard about NetFast HS from one of the employees of Net2Fast.net who was my AIM buddy... well to make a long story short, NetFast HS Rocks! Is the best Cable Modem and DSL tweaker get it from http://www.net2fast.net/hs/

Check out the a part of my posting on SPEEDCORPS, it reveals reasons for NetFast HS being better than other "patches" (I call them tweakers)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U don't trust those things? Well ok, dude. Just wanted to tell you that I went into my registry and checked out a few tweaks that NetFast HS does right and that SPEEDCORP does wrong, its simple...

Tcp1323Opts = "3" (DWORD Value) this is correct, the Tcp1323Opts are supposed to be DWORD Values, not Strings (which is what SPEEDCORP does wrong)!!! and the other one is a typo on the registry setting change... Instead of editing "SackOpts" SPEEDCORP edits "SockOpts"

I hope you aren't

To check out the rest of the settings that NetFast HS does simply go into the advanced settings of SPEEDCORP after using NetFast HS, although as I said SPEEDCORP tries to read an incorrect value for Tcp1323Opts and SackOpts.

I'm a Registry tweak guy, been in the bussines for a lil while, MY personal verdict... NetFast HS works BETTER than SPEEDCORP.

Whats wrong with it being for Windows 98/ME? oh and in their cheap looking FAQ page (http://www.net2fast.net/hs/faq.html) it says that Windows 95 Users can use it as long as they get a Winsock Update.

OH and since I'm bored and have nothing to do, here is what tweak of NetFast HS according to the speed up method:

--- Method 1: ---

TTL = 128 (String Value)
DefaultRcvWindow = 32767 (String Value)
PMTUBlackHoleDetect = "0" (String Value)
PMTUDiscovery = "1" (String Value)
SackOpts = "1" (String Value) -(In comparisson to SPEEDCORP it does "SockOpts" which is WRONG)
Tcp1323Opts = "3" (DWORD Value)
MaxMTU [of every binding] = "1500" (String Value)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--- Method 2: ---

TTL = 128 (String Value)
DefaultRcvWindow = 93440 (String Value)
PMTUBlackHoleDetect = "0" (String Value)
PMTUDiscovery = "1" (String Value)
SackOpts = "1" (String Value) -(In comparisson to SPEEDCORP it does "SockOpts" which is WRONG)
Tcp1323Opts = "3" (DWORD Value)
MaxMTU [of every binding] = "1500" (String Value)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--- Method 2: ---

TTL = 128 (String Value)
DefaultRcvWindow = 186880 (String Value)
PMTUBlackHoleDetect = "0" (String Value)
PMTUDiscovery = "1" (String Value)
SackOpts = "1" (String Value) -(In comparisson to SPEEDCORP it does "SockOpts" which is WRONG)
Tcp1323Opts = "3" (DWORD Value)
MaxMTU [of every binding] = "1500" (String Value)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hope to have brought 'norance' to you

From Santiago, Dominican Republic,

Best Regards to all you guyz,

Damn.. 32767 is old and outdated. Please Aim that person to tell them that. Thank you.

OK, I'll do that, after you know that there's no such thing as an "Outdated RWIN" and that is why there are three methods (I guess) because if one isn't good, pass on to the other tweak...

But anyway, w/e...


32767 might be the best RWIN value somebody might ever try, don't know if you believe me, but i KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT.

Bye.-

Program does not work on Windows XP. Why is the program over 1 meg long, when it is just changing some registry values? There is no way that POS interface is 1 meg.

Good luck with that progie.

Whats up Hereonearth? Remember me?

Anyway... there is no such thing as an outdated RWIN... 20940 (RWIN I use) has always worked for me and wont stop working because it's been my RWIN for a while.... That was just dumb, man.

Hey Ajax | Over 1 Meg Cuz...
U don't know? Have you heard about VB6 Runtimes? Their like one meg in size! My expierence tells me that NetFast HS was coded in VB6! And actually the NetFast HS executable is only 104 KB that big cuz of some high res images. the MSVBVM60.DLL is 1.32 MB why do they include the vb runtimes? dunno!

Thanks, I've had luck with the proggie.

----------------------
Hey EvilAjax, que esta pasando loco? Yo se que los aviones se estan cayendo, pero no le hagas caso a eso, no tengas miedo

Originally posted by HereOnEarth
Hey EvilAjax, que esta pasando loco? Yo se que los aviones se estan cayendo, pero no le hagas caso a eso, no tengas miedo

Tranquilo.
No tengo miedo loco... yo voy en Diciembre porque tengo una valsa de carajita llamandome todos los dias. Heh.

Todavia esta caliente?

no arriesgues la vida causa' por ir a ver a tu jerma al otro lado busca una aqui huevon!!

When I meant outdated Rwins, I meant that the rwin was really popular before but then people switched to other Rwins because they don't find it useful.

Listen, the outdate RWIN theory is absolute non-sense, first of all there are SOOOOOO many factors that influence if a RWIN is good or bad for you, but anyhoo, 32767 is the MOST SUCCESSFULLY used RWIN, check out http://www.regedit.com , maybe, only MAYBE you might LEARN something there.

HereOnEarth, do i also need to add the MaxDupAcks value or should i leave it out?

Originally posted by HereOnEarth
Listen, the outdate RWIN theory is absolute non-sense, first of all there are SOOOOOO many factors that influence if a RWIN is good or bad for you, but anyhoo, 32767 is the MOST SUCCESSFULLY used RWIN, check out http://www.regedit.com , maybe, only MAYBE you might LEARN something there.

Gee, tell me how many people uses that Rwin now, and compare that number to the ones that were using those before.

I use that RWIN and it ROCKS! Happy?