Page 1 of 1

Rwin

Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2001 12:56 pm
by chaobox99
I just read about the Cablenut Dictator words in broadband nut forum. The "correct" RWIN should be approximately

RWIN = max. bandwidth x average RTT

If this calculation is correct, is that mean we don't have to try any other values? ;)

So, how does this calculated RWIN compare to the default 64240,128480,256960,513920? :confused:
:D

Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2001 1:05 pm
by Lobo
Very easy, use what your system likes best :) :)

Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2001 1:19 pm
by chaobox99
I think the system is a box, everything is linear, isn't it? ;) There should be an equation to pinpoint an optimum RWIN value that will give you the optimum performance. May be I just think like a box....... :D

Does anyone know if there are any other parameters for RWIN beside bandwidth & RTT? :confused:

And, can someone tell me what "btw" means :o , it's been pondering me for quite a while, I can never figure it out.... :cry:

Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2001 1:34 pm
by Lobo
By the Way :) :) :)

Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2001 4:38 pm
by cablenut
Your RWIN is a total factor of your Connection Speed & Latency across your connection.

RWIN Discussion

The end users system really doesn't matter per say, as long it is optimal enough to accept the Internet connection to 100% it should be fine.

Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2001 4:46 pm
by rmrucker
I am not sure if "average" RTT is what you want. I would agrue for "the highest RTT that you are likely to encounter on a recurrent basis". (Yes, I am aware that sounds stupid)!

For example, if you set your RWIN at your Maximum bandwidth * average RTT -- then you are limiting your window size unnecessarily. What if you connect to a site with a high latency/high RTT -- yet the bandwidth is also high??

Then your window will NOT be full during most of the transmission. A larger RWIN would allow you to maintain a full window during the entire transmission, and therefore usually a faster transmission.

Unless someone can convince you that the RWIN is "too high" when you use the "highest likely RTT", then I would recommend a RWIN that is GREATER than (Maximum bandwidth * average RTT).

I would use (Maximum bandwidth * "highest likely RTT") as my minimal RWIN. But you will find many opinions...

Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2001 4:59 pm
by cablenut
Yes rmrucker I agree that is why in my post on my discussion board. I picked places where I knew I had many hops too (i.e. german sites, and canadian sites) I then took my Max latency and my Min from that group of sites and averaged them out. I wouldn't suggest finding your RTT from sites where you have little hops too, or your lowest latency too.