This should work, right?
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 10:23 pm
I've been having a lot of problems with my DSL since about December. At around that time, Pac Bell upgraded my service to a higher rate, but I've been having frequent disconnect problems. I finally had AT&T come out to look at it and it seems the problem is in my home wiring. AT&T's speed test seems to indicate I'm getting about 2.5MB/Sec down. The CO is about 1.5 miles away.
They used some kind of signal analyzer at the DMARC and then again on the wire going into my DSL Model and they saw many more errors at the DSL modem. At the DMARC the signal looked very good. One thing they found was that I had just a Y and a filter (rather than a splitter) at the DSL modem (that is what they gave me when they installed my DSL 6-7 years ago now). They replaced that with proper splitter (with I guess a high pass filter for the DSL and a low pass filter for the phone), but they still saw errors. At that point, they declared the problem was my wiring and they went on their merry way.
So, my thought is that I need to move the splitter to the DMARC and run a new wire directly from the DMARC to my office (about 20-25 feet, perhaps 50 by the time I get done routing the wire). I don't think the house wiring is twisted pair (just good old red/green/yellow/black) so perhaps that was part of my problem.
Since the splitter won't fit inside the DMARC, would it be OK to bring the line directly into my office on one twisted pair, feed that into the splitter and then send the phone signal back up another twisted pair to the DMARC and feed it back into the rest of the house?
There are a total of 3-phones plus a Tivo and a fax machine on the phone side of the line. Is there some reason why a single splitter would not be sufficient to handle all of those devices? Is there some sort of super whole-house filter that would do a better job? A filter is a filter, right?
I'm currently running with a jury-rig setup with the splitter hanging off the DMARC and a CAT-5 wire from the splitter going directly from there to the DSL modem and it seems to work, although I'm going to give it a day or two before I move to make it permanent.
Thanks,
Mark Z.
They used some kind of signal analyzer at the DMARC and then again on the wire going into my DSL Model and they saw many more errors at the DSL modem. At the DMARC the signal looked very good. One thing they found was that I had just a Y and a filter (rather than a splitter) at the DSL modem (that is what they gave me when they installed my DSL 6-7 years ago now). They replaced that with proper splitter (with I guess a high pass filter for the DSL and a low pass filter for the phone), but they still saw errors. At that point, they declared the problem was my wiring and they went on their merry way.
So, my thought is that I need to move the splitter to the DMARC and run a new wire directly from the DMARC to my office (about 20-25 feet, perhaps 50 by the time I get done routing the wire). I don't think the house wiring is twisted pair (just good old red/green/yellow/black) so perhaps that was part of my problem.
Since the splitter won't fit inside the DMARC, would it be OK to bring the line directly into my office on one twisted pair, feed that into the splitter and then send the phone signal back up another twisted pair to the DMARC and feed it back into the rest of the house?
There are a total of 3-phones plus a Tivo and a fax machine on the phone side of the line. Is there some reason why a single splitter would not be sufficient to handle all of those devices? Is there some sort of super whole-house filter that would do a better job? A filter is a filter, right?
I'm currently running with a jury-rig setup with the splitter hanging off the DMARC and a CAT-5 wire from the splitter going directly from there to the DSL modem and it seems to work, although I'm going to give it a day or two before I move to make it permanent.
Thanks,
Mark Z.