Page 1 of 1
Possible tweaking involved?
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 2:03 am
by KoRnGtL15
Here are my results.
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 08.25.2007 01:55
IP address: 68.116.xx.xxx
TCP options string: 020405b401010402
MSS: 1460
MTU: 1500
TCP Window: 65535 (NOT multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 0
Unscaled RWIN : 65535
Reccomended RWINs: 64240, 128480, 256960, 513920
BDP limit (200ms): 2621kbps (328KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 1049kbps (131KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 107
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
Here are my modem readings.
Modem Rx Power: +5.3dmv
Modem Rx SNR: 34.2db
Modem Tx Power: 47.7
CMTS Rx SNR: 30.8
I have Charter cable and im on there 5mb/512kbps plan. I usually 4892mb down and 486kbps up. Im also behind a linksys befsr41 v4.0 with newest firmware router. Also here is a traceroute.
Tracing route to
http://www.yahoo-ht3.akadns.net [209.131.36.158]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 15 ms 6 ms 5 ms 10.213.96.1
3 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms 68-116-79-233.or.charter.com [68.116.79.233]
4 7 ms 7 ms 8 ms 68-116-79-133.or.charter.com [68.116.79.133]
5 15 ms 18 ms 16 ms svl-edge-09.inet.qwest.net [65.113.33.109]
6 17 ms 16 ms 20 ms svl-core-02.inet.qwest.net [205.171.14.97]
7 18 ms 15 ms 15 ms pax-brdr-02.inet.qwest.net [205.171.205.30]
8 16 ms 16 ms 16 ms if-1-1.core3.PDI-PaloAlto.Teleglobe.net [207.45.
213.133]
9 19 ms 17 ms 16 ms ix-6-2.core3.PDI-PaloAlto.Teleglobe.net [207.45.
213.130]
10 17 ms 17 ms 17 ms g-0-0-0-p140.msr1.sp1.yahoo.com [216.115.107.49]
11 18 ms 20 ms 19 ms te-9-1.bas-a1.sp1.yahoo.com [209.131.32.23]
12 18 ms 18 ms 17 ms f1.
http://www.vip.sp1.yahoo.com [209.131.36.158]
Trace complete.
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 2:47 am
by trogers
Try the following with TCP Optimizer:
General Settings tab:
Custom settings - check
Modify All Network Adapters - check
network adapter selection - your NIC
MTU 1500
TTL - 64
TCP Receive Window - 128480
MTU Discovery - Yes
Black Hole Detect - No
Selective Acks - Yes
Max Duplicate ACKs - 2
TCP 1323 Options:
Windows Scaling - checked
Timestamps - uncheck
Advanced Settings tab:
Max Connections per Server - 10
Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 20
LocalPriority - 1
Host Priority - 1
DNSPriority - 1
NetbtPriority - 1
Lan Browsing speedup - optimized
QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0
ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0
ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 80
MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0
NetFailureCacheTime - 0
NegativeSOACache Time - 0
LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768
Then select "Apply Changes" and reboot to take effect
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 2:11 pm
by KoRnGtL15
Thanks for your reply and settings. It "seems" to be moving quicker. I headed on over to dslreports.com and took there tweak test with the settings you suggested. Before I got all smileys and no suggestions. It said everything was looking good. They just suggested I become pingable. But now. It says this.
http://www.dslreports.com/tweakr/block: ... via=normal
Notes and recommendations:
Choose RWIN between 48180 and 125560
trogers wrote:Try the following with TCP Optimizer:
General Settings tab:
Custom settings - check
Modify All Network Adapters - check
network adapter selection - your NIC
MTU 1500
TTL - 64
TCP Receive Window - 128480
MTU Discovery - Yes
Black Hole Detect - No
Selective Acks - Yes
Max Duplicate ACKs - 2
TCP 1323 Options:
Windows Scaling - checked
Timestamps - uncheck
Advanced Settings tab:
Max Connections per Server - 10
Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 20
LocalPriority - 1
Host Priority - 1
DNSPriority - 1
NetbtPriority - 1
Lan Browsing speedup - optimized
QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0
ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0
ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 80
MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0
NetFailureCacheTime - 0
NegativeSOACache Time - 0
LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768
Then select "Apply Changes" and reboot to take effect
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 2:24 pm
by trogers
KoRnGtL15 wrote:
Notes and recommendations:
Choose RWIN between 48180 and 125560
That is the main difference between Speedguide's TCP Optimizer and other tweak programs. Here, we recommended to first calculate RWIN to the largest even mulitples of MSS without Window scaling.
When bandwidth or latency demands RWIN to be higher than 65535, we recommend to set RWIN higher by the next scale factor:
For MTU = 1500 and MSS = 1460
Unscale RWIN = MSS x 44 = 64240
Next scaled RWIN = 64240 x 2 = 128480 - for US bandwidth 5-8 mbps
And the next = 128480 x 2 = 256960 - for US bandwidth 8-16 mbps
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 3:10 pm
by KoRnGtL15
Got ya. Thanks again for the help!
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:25 pm
by KoRnGtL15
trogers,
Like I said. Everything is moving great now. But I did forget to post a new report from your new settings. Is everything ok still and optimal?
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 08.28.2007 22:23
IP address: 68.116.xx.xxx
TCP options string: 020405b40103030101010402
MSS: 1460
MTU: 1500
TCP Window: 128480 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 1
Unscaled RWIN : 64240
Reccomended RWINs: 64240, 128480, 256960, 513920
BDP limit (200ms): 5139kbps (642KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 2056kbps (257KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 43
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:38 pm
by trogers
Your settings look all okay. Keep your comp spyware free and happy surfing.
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:58 am
by KoRnGtL15
trogers,
I need your help asap! Would really appreciate it. I just upgraded my connection to 10mb/1mb. You optimized my connection for 5mb/512 with TCP Optimizer. I am currently using those settings until you can fix me up and optimize me again for my new service. Here are my results with the new service upgrade.
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 04.30.2008 00:56
IP address: 68.116.xx.xxx
TCP options string: 020405b40103030101010402
MSS: 1460
MTU: 1500
TCP Window: 128480 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 1
Unscaled RWIN : 64240
Reccomended RWINs: 64240, 128480, 256960, 513920
BDP limit (200ms): 5139kbps (642KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 2056kbps (257KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 42
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:07 am
by Rollingstone
Try the following with TCP Optimizer:
General Settings tab:
Custom settings - check
Modify All Network Adapters - check
network adapter selection - your NIC
MTU 1500
TTL - 64
TCP Receive Window - 256960
MTU Discovery - Yes
Black Hole Detect - No
Selective Acks - Yes
Max Duplicate ACKs - 2
TCP 1323 Options:
Windows Scaling - check
Timestamps - uncheck
Advanced Settings tab:
Max Connections per Server - 10
Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 20
LocalPriority - 1
Host Priority - 1
DNSPriority - 1
NetbtPriority - 1
Lan Browsing speedup - optimized
QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0
ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0
ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 80
MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0
NetFailureCacheTime - 0
NegativeSOACache Time - 0
LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768
Then select "Apply Changes" and reboot to take effect
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:24 am
by KoRnGtL15
Thanks! How am I looking now?
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 04.30.2008 01:23
IP address: 68.116.xx.xxx
TCP options string: 020405b40103030201010402
MSS: 1460
MTU: 1500
TCP Window: 256960 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 2
Unscaled RWIN : 64240
Reccomended RWINs: 64240, 128480, 256960, 513920
BDP limit (200ms): 10278kbps (1285KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 4111kbps (514KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 42
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
Rollingstone wrote:Try the following with TCP Optimizer:
General Settings tab:
Custom settings - check
Modify All Network Adapters - check
network adapter selection - your NIC
MTU 1500
TTL - 64
TCP Receive Window - 256960
MTU Discovery - Yes
Black Hole Detect - No
Selective Acks - Yes
Max Duplicate ACKs - 2
TCP 1323 Options:
Windows Scaling - check
Timestamps - uncheck
Advanced Settings tab:
Max Connections per Server - 10
Max Connections per 1.0 Server - 20
LocalPriority - 1
Host Priority - 1
DNSPriority - 1
NetbtPriority - 1
Lan Browsing speedup - optimized
QoS: NonBestEffortLimit - 0
ToS: DisableUserTOSSetting - 0
ToS: DefaultTOSValue - 80
MaxNegativeCacheTtl - 0
NetFailureCacheTime - 0
NegativeSOACache Time - 0
LAN Request Buffer Size - 32768
Then select "Apply Changes" and reboot to take effect
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:52 am
by KoRnGtL15
I am using a Toshiba PCX2200 cable modem and found out it could be holding back my speed. Are your settings still optimal overall for 10mb/1mb service? Or will I need to make changes again when picking up my new modem to get full speeds?
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 9:01 pm
by KoRnGtL15
Guess my speeds are now optimal with your new settings. Picked up a new modem and have full speeds now. Thanks again!

Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 10:45 pm
by KoRnGtL15
Question. If I was to upgrade to the 16mb/2mb tier. Would my current settings work okay with that or would I need to come back and report for you guys can set me up again?
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 10:50 pm
by trogers
KoRnGtL15 wrote:Question. If I was to upgrade to the 16mb/2mb tier. Would my current settings work okay with that or would I need to come back and report for you guys can set me up again?
Set this
TCP Receive Window - 256960
to this
TCP Receive Window - 513920
for 16/2 mbps line.
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:47 pm
by KoRnGtL15
Sorry to bring this back from the dead. I thought it would be better then making a whole new thread. I upgraded to the 16mb/2mb tier about a week or so ago. General question. The slider that is in the optimizer. Am I suppose to move that to the 16,000kbps since I am on the 16mb/2mb tier now?
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 2:12 pm
by dlsayremn
Yes
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 3:54 am
by KoRnGtL15
I am back again. We are getting another upgrade in the next 2 weeks or so. Charter cable is increasing the 16mb/2mb to 20mb/2mb. Which we are currently on the 16mb/2mb tier. I wanted to know if any changes need to be made when we get that new speed increase of 20mb/2mb or are my current settings fine? Thanks guys.
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 7:01 am
by trogers
KoRnGtL15 wrote:I am back again. We are getting another upgrade in the next 2 weeks or so. Charter cable is increasing the 16mb/2mb to 20mb/2mb. Which we are currently on the 16mb/2mb tier. I wanted to know if any changes need to be made when we get that new speed increase of 20mb/2mb or are my current settings fine? Thanks guys.
TCP Receive Window set at 513920 is good for speed of up to 24 mbps within North America.
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:06 am
by KoRnGtL15
Thanks trogers. I will leave it as is. Do you suggest moving the slider in tcp/ip optimizer to 20? I have it on 16 with the custom settings you guys suggested.
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:25 pm
by Rollingstone
Do you suggest moving the slider in tcp/ip optimizer to 20?
When using Custom Settings, no need to move the slider !
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 7:33 pm
by KoRnGtL15
Hey guys,
I am back. Still with Charter on the 20mb/2mb plan. Recently they implemented PowerBoost. Basically gives me faster speeds for a few seconds or when not many are using the network. Do I need any more tweaking using the SG TCP/IP Optimizer or are the settings still fine? Also. I heard we will be getting a upgrade. From 20mb/2mb to 20mb/5mb Will I need to adjust any thing with in SG TCP/IP Optimizer?
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 9:00 pm
by Rollingstone
KoRnGtL15 wrote:Hey guys,
I am back. Still with Charter on the 20mb/2mb plan. Recently they implemented PowerBoost. Basically gives me faster speeds for a few seconds or when not many are using the network. Do I need any more tweaking using the SG TCP/IP Optimizer or are the settings still fine? Also. I heard we will be getting a upgrade. From 20mb/2mb to 20mb/5mb Will I need to adjust any thing with in SG TCP/IP Optimizer?
First, do a TCP Analyzer test
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 12:40 am
by KoRnGtL15
Here you go.
« SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results »
Tested on: 11.01.2009 00:40
IP address: 68.116.xx.xxx
Client OS: Windows XP
TCP options string: 020405b40103030301010402
MSS: 1460
MTU: 1500
TCP Window: 513920 (multiple of MSS)
RWIN Scaling: 3 bits (2^3=8)
Unscaled RWIN : 64240
Recommended RWINs: 64240, 128480, 256960, 513920, 1027840
BDP limit (200ms): 20557kbps (2570KBytes/s)
BDP limit (500ms): 8223kbps (1028KBytes/s)
MTU Discovery: ON
TTL: 40
Timestamps: OFF
SACKs: ON
IP ToS: 00000000 (0)
Rollingstone wrote:First, do a TCP Analyzer test
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:35 am
by Rollingstone
Just keep it ! Or try TCP Window 1027840 !
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:59 am
by KoRnGtL15
Thanks. I went ahead and made the adjustment. Hope I made the right choice.
Rollingstone wrote:Just keep it ! Or try TCP Window 1027840 !